As the new school year is underway, and national data on reading scores remains stagnant, it is a critical time to rethink vocabulary development for middle school students.
As an 8th grade ELA teacher I taught “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July,” by Frederick Douglass. It was a challenging and complex text that my students tackled with me. Rich with unfamiliar and multiple-meaning words like “channel,” “streams,” “wrath” and “bear,” the speech was often daunting. A student I was working with one-on-one had a hard time understanding a key word in the text. I watched him struggle for a few moments before asking him what he was doing. He said, “looking for context clues,” as he frantically scanned the text like a detective on "The First 48." That was confusing to me, because I knew there were no context clues for the word he was trying to define. I asked him why he was doing that—a practice that was clearly not working—and he looked at me, wide-eyed and earnest, and said “because my elementary teacher said to use context clues when I don’t understand a word.”
Then, I asked all of my classes what they did when they hit a word they didn’t know, I got the same answer every time in every class: “Look for context clues.” I got this answer from my co-taught classes and my honors class. All my students were on snipe hunts.
I asked every class the same question: “What do you do if they don’t exist?”
My students looked at me like I’d grown a second head. One plucky and bright girl insisted, “Ms. Daughtery, they always exist. That’s what my teacher said to do in 4th grade.” I sighed.
My students, and I suspect some of yours, too, had limited strategies for determining the meaning of an unknown word. When context clues are in the text, they can be incredibly helpful to a reader trying to figure out the meaning of a word. But, when they are not in the text, the reader must use a different strategy. Without other strategies to determine the meaning of a word and the metacognitive ability to know when to use another strategy, readers are often stuck, confused, and frustrated—sometimes to the point of quitting.
Using context clues is a good strategy, but middle and high school students need multiple strategies and the ability to know when to use them. To support vocabulary development, middle school students need ongoing instruction in multisyllabic decoding and morpheme analysis, syntax, metacognition, and writing.
The matter is of urgency. National focus on early literacy has left middle school readers struggling, particularly after pandemic-related learning disruptions. The 2024 NAEP results show steep declines for both 8th and 12th grade students in reading: only 30% of eighth graders read at or above proficiency, continuing a downward trend since before COVID. NWEA data confirms that middle schoolers are far behind pre-pandemic reading levels, with 6th graders needing nearly 5 extra months of instruction, 7th graders nearly 7 months, and 8th graders about 9 months—close to a full year—to catch up to prepandemic levels. The challenge is worsened by the fact that about 40% of teachers in grades 3–8 misunderstand how word-reading develops, and many rely mainly on personal experience instead of research-based methods.
4 reading strategies to try with middle schoolers
1. Multisyllabic decoding and morphology analysis
Middle school texts are rich with words; many of these are long, multisyllabic, and packed with meaning. Multisyllabic decoding is the ability to break down and read words with multiple syllables. In the early grades, students learn to decode simple, one- or two-syllable words. But by middle school, texts contain much longer words like photosynthesis, independence, and revolutionary. Without effective strategies for breaking these words into manageable parts, students may stumble or guess, both of which interfere with comprehension.
Morpheme analysis takes things a step further. A morpheme is the smallest unit of meaning in a word—like prefixes (un-, pre-, dis-), roots (bio, graph, struct), and suffixes (-ing, -able, -tion). Understanding these parts allows students to figure out the meaning of unfamiliar words.
For example, consider the word unbelievable. A student who understands that un- means “not,” believe is the root, and -able means “capable of,” can figure out that unbelievable means “not capable of being believed.” Multiply this by hundreds of words across different subjects, and you can see the power of morpheme knowledge. Morpheme analysis allows students access to thousands of words, and it gives them the ability to deconstruct and comprehend new and unfamiliar vocabulary.
One instructional strategy to try is morpheme mapping. Using a graphic organizer, like a morpheme map or word matrix, can help students break down and analyze words into roots, prefixes, and suffixes. Choose a target word (e.g., invisible). Guide students to identify and label the parts: Prefix: in- (not); Root: vis (see); and Suffix: -ible (able to be). Then, map out the morphemes and define the word based on the meanings of its parts. Finally, have students brainstorm and map related words (e.g., vision, visual, revise, visibility).
2. Syntax analysis
Syntax is the formation of sentences and their associated grammatical rules and the relationship between words and phrases in a sentence. Syntax allows the reader access to the semantics of a sentence, a critical skill for determining the meaning of multiple meaning words. Syntax analysis is important for vocabulary development in middle school because it not only helps students not only recognize words but also understand and use them accurately in context.
Syntax analysis deepens an understanding of word meaning. Words often change meaning depending on their placement in a sentence. By analyzing syntax, students can figure out how a word functions—whether as a noun, verb, or adjective—and grasp its meaning. For example, “run” is a multiple meaning word, and can function both as a verb and a noun. Understanding the difference aids comprehension; “run” means something different in “I run every day” vs. “I have a run in my tights.”
Middle school texts introduce more complex and abstract vocabulary. Syntax analysis allows students to use sentence structure and grammatical cues to infer meanings of unfamiliar words. When students learn to identify appositives, relative clauses, or modifiers, they gain powerful tools for figuring out the meanings of unfamiliar words.
Appositives rename or clarify nouns. Consider this sentence: "Harriet Tubman, an abolitionist and conductor on the Underground Railroad, led hundreds of enslaved people to freedom." The appositive "an abolitionist and conductor on the Underground Railroad" gives the meaning of “Harriet Tubman” in this context. If students encounter an unfamiliar word within an appositive—like abolitionist—they can often understand it from the extra information provided.
Relative Clauses add essential or extra details about a noun. Consider this sentence, "The arboretum, which contains hundreds of rare plant species, is open to the public year-round." The relative clause "which contains hundreds of rare plant species" provides details about arboretum. Even if “arboretum” is new, students can infer it is a place with plants.
Modifiers are words or phrases that describe other words or phrases. Consider this sentence, "The ferocious, sharp-clawed predator leapt from the tree." The modifiers "ferocious" and "sharp-clawed" help paint a picture of the predator and can suggest meaning for “predator” itself, even if the word is new.
These strategies support students’ independent vocabulary building. Instead of solely depending on context clues, students can use grammar cues to make meaning.
3. Metacognition
Metacognition—thinking about one’s own thinking—is important for vocabulary development because it turns word learning from a passive process into an intentional, self-directed one. Metacognition helps students monitor their understanding. Middle school texts often contain abstract, discipline-specific vocabulary. Metacognitive strategies (like pausing to ask, “Do I really know what this word means?”) help students recognize when they’ve misunderstood or only partially understood a word. Without this awareness, they might skip over unfamiliar words and miss key ideas.
Additionally, when students are metacognitive, they know when to use context clues and when to use another strategy, like a morpheme analysis or syntax analysis to determine word meaning. Students can ask themselves questions while reading like, “Does this text have enough information for me to determine the meaning of the word I don’t understand?” “Have I seen this word before?” “Have I seen parts of this word (root, prefix, suffix) before?” and “What is this word doing in the sentence? Is it a noun, a verb, or something else?”
4. Writing and speaking
Writing and speaking new vocabulary helps to cement new words in the reader’s lexicon. Writing is important for vocabulary development in middle school because it moves students from recognizing and understanding words to using them. Writing also reinforces decoding through encoding the word, further cementing it in the student’s mind. Writing forces students to retrieve words from memory and apply them, which strengthens long-term retention. Not only that, but students also pay more attention to semantics and shades of meaning when they have a larger vocabulary to draw from.
Actively using vocabulary deepens understanding of new words. When students write, they choose the right word for the right context. This pushes them to think about meaning, tone, and nuance. These skills go beyond memorizing definitions or word recognition. For example, deciding between argue, debate, and persuade requires deeper semantic awareness.
As students write essays, narratives, and explanations, they can be taught to notice when they repeat words or use vague language. This awareness motivates them to replace overused terms with more precise vocabulary, building range and sophistication. Finally, writing makes students think about how words interact with sentence structure and audience expectations. If students are familiar with syntax analysis, they can be taught to see how syntax, word choice, and tone work together to convey meaning—linking grammar skills with vocabulary growth.
This year, remember the word
Reading is not a bag of one-size-fits-all tricks. Readers need lots of strategies in their own personal bag of tricks and discernment to know when to use each one.
Middle school students are expected to read and understand complex texts in every subject. From biology to literature, vocabulary becomes more academic and specialized. These words are often built from Greek and Latin roots, making morpheme analysis especially valuable. Students who lack these skills may struggle with comprehension, fall behind, and lose confidence. On the other hand, students who can decode long words and analyze their parts gain access to a much broader vocabulary. They become more independent readers, better writers, and more successful learners. This year let’s broaden our students’ understanding of not just words, but how they work—and how to use a range of strategies to determine their meaning.
***
Dive deeper into the science of teaching reading. Learn more about our science of reading curriculum, an evidence-based approach that builds on the five components of the science of reading, plus integrates background knowledge and writing.
Get our free Science of Reading eBook today.
