READ 180: Evidence and Efficacy for Students with Disabilities and English Learners
At a glance
  • Demonstrates a Rationale
  • Program: READ 180®
  • Subjects: Intervention, Literacy
  • Report Type: Research Foundations
  • Grade Level: Elementary, Middle, High
Author Letter

Dear Educators,

Now more than ever, we have the tools to improve the lives of students through reading instruction. We have years of research demonstrating effective practices for teaching reading comprehension and the experience to transform that research into instruction. The era of more rigorous standards has brought the relationship between research and instructional practice into sharp focus. Educators are able to monitor the progress of their students through technology, assessments, and their own observations and adjust their instruction accordingly.

Highly effective blended learning solutions, such as READ 180, are having significantly positive impacts on the achievement of struggling readers. There has been much progress in enhancing the technology base for the newest edition, READ 180 Universal, such as refining the adaptivity of the learner profile. Even more importantly, there has been a realization of the critical need for supporting educators in using the new technology as effectively as possible.

Most important, however, is the ability of technology to let teachers engage and motivate students to be lifelong learners. I have been fortunate to partner with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH) in continuously improving READ 180 after conducting the formative research and developing the initial prototype. Most recently, I have been involved in the development of the new READ 180—now called READ 180 Universal—ensuring that it first and foremost places the teacher in a central role in the program’s implementation, and then ensuring that it includes the most updated research and best practices in the field on how to effectively use technology to support instruction. With the dual benefit of teacher-facilitated instruction and the Student Application (Student App), READ 180 Universal is designed to provide personalized and individualized instruction that meets each student’s unique ability level, interests, and needs.

Well-designed blended learning solutions offer many positive benefits for our struggling students and allow teachers to do what they do best: teach with confidence and purpose. For example, some aspects of blended learning solutions that support teachers and students include technology that is:

  1. Adaptive
  2. Effective at facilitating practice leading to mastery
  3. Available anytime and anywhere
  4. Effective at gathering and processing data
  5. Motivating

As evidence of what makes blended learning solutions most efficacious has increased, so has awareness of the teacher’s role in making sure that the technology is being used appropriately.

While new and adaptive technologies make it possible for all students, especially those who are struggling, to benefit from good instruction, technology is not magic. After all, students will not remember the computer that taught them to read; they will remember the teacher who changed their lives. The new READ 180 Universal was developed to support these life-changing teachers as they serve their students.

I firmly believe that READ 180 Universal will provide the support that all students need to thrive not only in an educational setting, but in life beyond school. This is most critical for students struggling with language, cognitive, and social-emotional needs. With the assistance of adaptive technology, quality instructional materials, and effective professional learning support for teachers, a much-needed lifeline can be provided to all students.

Sincerely,
Dr. Ted Hasselbring

Introduction
“[E]nough is already known about adolescent literacy—both the nature of the problems of struggling readers and the types of approaches to address these needs—in order to act immediately on a broad scale.”

Successfully reading a text for deep comprehension entails extracting and constructing meaning through an interaction between the text, task, and reader (Snow, 2002). Reading comprehension is an extremely complex task that encompasses several constructs, including language development, word recognition, text fluency, knowledge building, vocabulary, affective skills, and writing. It requires mastery and automaticity of these cognitive processes. As such, struggling readers typically benefit from identification of their individual strengths and weaknesses and intervention in one or more of these areas as needed. The editorial team at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH) has carefully considered the complexity of reading comprehension in the design and development of READ 180 Universal.

The goal of READ 180 Universal is to translate theory into practice through a program that identifies and addresses the needs of each individual student. In designing READ 180 Universal, we have considered the interaction of these processes and subprocesses and developed a program that includes instruction, practice, assessment, and professional learning in each of them. As such, READ 180 Universal will allow every student to master and automatize each of the subprocesses required for fluent reading comprehension and reach the goal of comprehending and appreciating complex texts.

READ 180 Universal was developed with the era of rigorous standards foremost in our minds, especially with the intent to support students at risk for academic challenges. We firmly believe that all students can learn to read complex texts, and that the responsibility for learners’ literacy and language development is shared between the teacher and the student within the school, as well as with parents and community leaders outside the school. As such, we seek to provide teachers and parents with the tools necessary to be effective in building what Linda Darling-Hammond calls “shared responsibility” (Darling-Hammond, 2004). With READ 180 Universal, we intend to provide all teachers, students, and families with well-designed, comprehensive, and individualized learning opportunities that motivate students to reach their full potential.

Following the aspirations of heightened state standards, READ 180 Universal is designed to provide an exceptional educational experience for students by focusing on the importance of teachers, families, and the learning community in providing educational opportunities that meet the needs of each individual student.

As such, READ 180 Universal seeks to do the following:

  • Provide rigorous instructional resources that meet the diverse language, cognitive, social, and emotional needs of students, as well as provide learning opportunities that are motivating for students
  • Carefully design and present instructional content that ensures students’ engagement and sets them on a path to become lifelong learners
  • Encourage growth mindset and self-efficacy, such that teachers and students view learning as a fluid process that continually grows with effort and can be controlled and regulated by planning and organizing, setting and meeting goals, problem solving, regulating emotions, and monitoring behavior
  • Develop neural networks in disparate areas of the brain through instruction that allows students to master and integrate the myriad skills necessary for successful reading comprehension
  • Use student data effectively to drive and differentiate instruction, resulting in learning experiences that are tailored to individual students’ needs
  • Personalize and individualize instruction by using adaptive technology that empowers students to work independently at their own level and pace
  • Prepare students and teachers for assessment of and for learning by informing appropriate instruction, establishing priorities for professional learning, and providing tools for accountability purposes
  • Support extended learning beyond the classroom by encouraging family engagement that can be done in the home with parents and siblings
  • Create an educative curriculum that inspires teachers to exchange best practices in professional learning communities to effectively teach students to the levels of depth required by rigorous standards
The Evidence Base and Efficacy of READ 180 Universal

READ 180 Universal is a new blended learning solution that incorporates up-to-date research and practice with a deep commitment to using evidence and efficacy to inform and inspire. The initial version of READ 180 was developed in 1999 and soon produced success stories in schools across the country. With the changing educational landscape, new versions of the program have been created to accommodate the needs of students from various backgrounds and reflect the growing body of reading research and technology innovation.

In 2004, READ 180 Enterprise Edition was developed in continued collaboration with Dr. Ted Hasselbring, who was joined by Dr. Kevin Feldman, Director of Reading and Early Intervention, Sonoma County Office of Education, and Dr. Kate Kinsella, adjunct faculty member, College of Education at San Francisco State University. The Enterprise Edition added structured engagement routines introduced in the rBook® that ensure full participation by all learners, provided additional second-language support to English learners, and introduced SAM™ platform in order for teachers to better keep track of student data and progress.

In 2008, System 44® was launched as a Tier 3 solution for students who were struggling the most. The program is designed to provide students with systematic instruction in the foundational literacy skills necessary to progress toward reading comprehension.

In 2011, READ 180 Next Generation was launched to provide teachers with a simpler, easier-to-use instructional system with a more directed path for data-driven differentiated instruction, as well as to increase writing instruction and to give students more ownership of their learning.

Along these lines, READ 180 Universal was developed to provide students with even more personalized, individualized, and engaging instruction. This newest version targets what we know about the brain and how children learn in many different ways—from executive functioning to specific cognitive skills to social and emotional intelligence—and provides them with the language supports necessary for successful learning.

Each new version of READ 180 has been built upon a foundation of careful, thorough research in consultation with renowned educational researchers as well as educator experiences and best practices. As the results of 40 research studies published in our latest READ 180 compendium show, from 2000 to 2015, the program has been successful with students of diverse backgrounds, including English learners, students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged students, and students of various ethnicities in California and across the nation.

Given the current federal push for evidence of return on investment in education spending, a study conducted by Whiteboard Advisors (2012) in Napa Valley Unified School District found that, in addition to READ 180 students making significant gains on the state assessment, the district tracked lower referral rates into special education, as well as lower numbers of expulsions and suspensions since implementing the program.

Additional studies have found READ 180 to be effective for English learners. In a bronze level study conducted in Deer Valley Unified School District, Arizona, fourth- through eighth-grade English learners made significant gains on the state reading test and HMH Reading Inventory® after using READ 180 for a year (2012). Likewise, in Lawrence Public Schools, Massachusetts, elementary, middle, and high school English learners showed significant achievement gains on state assessments after using READ 180 (2009).

In October of 2015, the United States Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences (IES) published a report summarizing the federally-funded Striving Readers research on the effectiveness of intervention programs on the reading achievement of struggling adolescent students. The authors of the report found that READ 180 was the only program out of 10 studied as part of the Striving Readers project that had positive effects on reading achievement, according to the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) review criteria. The Striving Readers gold level studies , which took place from 2006–2011, included multiple evaluations of READ 180 in large urban school districts across the country. In Newark, New Jersey, significant impacts were reported for all students, including student groups such as boys, African Americans, and students with disabilities. READ 180 was shown to have a significantly positive impact on incarcerated students in the Ohio Department of Youth Services facilities, the majority of whom were male and African American, and a large percentage of whom were students with disabilities. Additionally, READ 180 was shown to have a significantly positive impact for students in the urban suburban school district of Springfield-Chicopee, Massachusetts, and the urban school district of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, both of which contain large percentages of economically disadvantaged students.

READ 180 was the only program out of 10 studied as part of the Striving Readers project that had positive effects on reading achievement. (U.S. DOE, 2015)

In September of 2016, the IES released a report pointing to effective reading programs and practices for adolescents. This report’s comprehensive review of more than 7,000 studies sought to answer which programs and practices that have been researched over the past 20 years are actually effective for helping middle and high school students who are struggling with literacy (including reading comprehension and vocabulary). Using the WWC criteria, the authors found READ 180 to be one of the only intervention programs investigated over the past several decades to have a positive or potentially positive impact on reading achievement for adolescent students.

Taken together with decades of independent and HMH-initiated research on READ 180’s effectiveness, these two recent reports from IES suggest that with the continued level of perseverance and research from HMH, READ 180 will remain one of the most efficacious intervention programs for adolescent students ever to be available in schools.

How READ 180 Universal Addresses the Five Strands of Personalized Learning

Teachers are the most integral component of effective, personalized learning programs. In designing READ 180 Universal, the essential role of the teacher in providing personalized learning was recognized. In addition to the crucial role of the teacher, five strands that have been identified as effective in accelerating implementation of technology-enabled personalized learning (National Summit, 2014) were considered in the development of the program. Below is a description of these strands and how the design of READ 180 Universal applies to them.

Strand 1: Data

Personalized learning requires a robust, timely, and dynamic picture of student performance, preferences, and needs. Teachers need real-time access to meaningful data to more effectively guide students’ learning experiences. READ 180 Universal allows for this by providing real-time, actionable data to students, teachers, and school leaders in order to inform instruction and to more effectively personalize the learning. READ 180 Universal’s timely data and student assessments help teachers pinpoint exactly where individual students must focus so they can master the foundations of reading and move toward more advanced skills such as higher-order thinking, problem solving, and academic writing.

Strand 2: Content and Curriculum

Personalized technology allows for “recommendation engines” that guide instruction based on student data, student choices and interests, and teacher insight. In this way, both teachers and students play a major role in determining the content and curriculum that will be most effective for students. Recommendation engine systems allow for the optimal matching of learning opportunities with student needs and preferences in order to create maximal learning environments.

READ 180 Universal’s Student App identifies where students are and helps them learn at their own pace to get them where they need to be. Powered by the FASTT (Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology) algorithm underlying READ 180 Universal, the Student App provides students with repeated structured practice with limited sets of new material, which is how the brain learns best.

READ 180 Universal provides teachers with tools, including grouping tools and observation tools, to help inform instruction through student data. The grouping tool on HMH Teacher Central® groups students according to their specific needs identified through ongoing assessment, allowing teachers to easily and efficiently plan differentiated instruction and intervention.

Strand 3: Technology Architecture

Technology architecture refers to enterprise systems that can access and manage data, content, and communications. It creates an integrated approach to curriculum that allows access to information anytime and anywhere. These types of platforms are needed for school systems to gather and analyze assessment and other data, deliver multi-modal and universally designed resources, and match these two areas based on ongoing assessment of student performance and needs.

In READ 180 Universal, teachers and leaders have access to HMH Teacher Central, a platform that gives educators real-time, actionable data and reports. HMH Teacher Central is a comprehensive online management system that collects and organizes READ 180 Universal student performance data. This includes a suite of reports that can be accessed through individual Teacher Dashboards and Leadership Dashboards. HMH Teacher Central’s management system supports teachers in decision making on placement, grouping, and instruction, as well as monitoring progress. It supports schools in meeting Adequate Yearly Progress in accountability requirements and district-wide data aggregation for teachers, district administrators, and technology coordinators.

Strand 4: Research and Development

Since teachers and students are at the center of personalized learning, research and development is necessary in order to translate the vision of this type of learning into effective implementation of it. Cognitive and brain science research, adaptive tutorial software development, and change management and professional development best practices are needed for effective school redesign into a student-centered model.

READ 180 Universal is the result of decades of iterative research constantly informing and enhancing program development. In 1999, READ 180 was born out of a research partnership between practitioners, scholars, and the Intervention Solutions team. READ 180 Universal incorporates seminal and current advancements in research and understanding of learning strategies, best instructional practices, and the latest technology developments. READ 180 Universal further benefits from its academic authors, who ensure that the program best reflects their areas of expertise.

Strand 5: Human Capacity

Technology plays a role in making personalized learning effective; however, teachers play the primary role in ensuring that the technology-enabled personalized learning will be successful. Systems must be designed with the input of all stakeholders, including teachers, students, administrators, and families. The technology-enabled personalized learning, approached in a systematic way and with the teacher as the key player, should be viewed as integral to student learning.

READ 180 Universal allows for this by putting the teacher front and center and designing the technology in a way that meets the needs of teachers, students, and parents. READ 180 Universal is designed with the understanding that achieving reading success with upper-elementary and secondary students requires more than teaching reading strategies.

The development process for READ 180 Universal included user and pilot testing with students, teachers, administrators, and families. As a result, READ 180 Universal’s blended learning approach helps teachers, administrators, and families support competencies and capacities in students that are pivotal for advancing from struggling reader to competent reader.

Advances in Special Education and English Learner Instruction

Over the past three and a half decades, awareness and sensitivity to the types of school practices that are most effective for struggling students have been at the forefront of educators’ minds. There is less emphasis on identification of disabilities, language challenges, and remedial services, and greater emphasis on early identification of curriculum-based weaknesses, with interventions taking place in the regular classroom (McCleary, Rowlette, Pelchar, & Bain, 2013). Instead of placing the onus of responsibility on students, educators recognize the central role that they play in educating students and assisting them in overcoming the learning hurdles that they face.

All students served under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) must be provided with a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment, which can pose challenges for schools and teachers who need to ensure that instruction is catering to students with a wide range of abilities. According to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP, 2008), 95% of students between the ages of six and 21 served under IDEA were educated in regular classrooms for at least some portion of the school day, with 53.7% being educated inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day, up from 46.5% in 2000 (U.S. Department of Education, 2008).

Individualized instruction that supports all students, especially students with disabilities and English learners, requires that teachers understand the importance of growth mindset, recognize the value of social-emotional learning, and learn about the neuroscientific principles that underlie what we know about how people learn. It also requires that educators build professional learning communities and encourage family engagement. Incorporating Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and ongoing formative assessment tools allows teachers to create spaces that support all students on their educational journey.

The goal of READ 180 Universal is to translate these ideas into practice through a program that identifies and addresses the needs of each individual student.

READ 180 Universal’s commitment to all struggling students, especially those with disabilities and English learners, is unparalleled. Many students come to school with complex and layered challenges—such as language skill deficits, comprehension issues, and/or learning disabilities that require help in multiple areas. With this in mind, READ 180 Universal materials include ample support systems that embrace the unique needs of both students and their teacher.

At its core, READ 180 Universal aims to provide the learning opportunities that each unique student deserves:

  • To encourage meaning making through critical thinking and the ability to view and articulate important issues from multiple perspectives
  • To develop the content knowledge and foundational literacy skills one needs to be successful in school, the workplace, and society
  • To support effective expression and language development
  • To spark the imagination with new perspectives that provide a profound understanding of self and others
  • To realize one’s own potential academically and socially

In providing these opportunities, READ 180 Universal allows teachers to reach the goal of accelerating all students to grade-level proficiency.

The READ 180 Universal Instructional Model

Whole-Group Learning: Using a blended learning model, teachers begin each class by facilitating instruction in reading skills and strategies, content-area and academic vocabulary, writing conventions, and academic discussions to the whole class. The class completes multiple readings of engaging, grade-level texts that increase in complexity using a gradual release model. In the beginning of this gradual release approach, the teacher reads the text aloud to students, modeling fluency and guiding students to an understanding of the text’s central ideas. Whole-Group Learning also includes systematic instruction in vocabulary and writing. Vocabulary instruction helps students strengthen their language skills. Scaffolded writing instruction models and helps students develop writing skills and culminates in an essay-length writing activity. The teacher guides students in analyzing a model text and then uses routines to help students internalize the writing process.

Student Application (Student App): Students work independently on the READ 180 Universal Student App, where they follow a path that allows them to work within their zone of proximal development. Each segment of the Student App consists of six zones that provide targeted instruction, practice, and feedback on the components of reading for which students need the most assistance: Explore Zone, Reading Zone, Language Zone, Fluency Zone, Writing Zone, and Success Zone. The students move through the zones on individualized paths that take into consideration their performance on assessments and previous Student App activities, engagement, and interests.

  • In the Explore Zone, students watch an Anchor Video to build background knowledge and develop a mental model for the segment and then complete an activity focused on high-leverage vocabulary to determine if they need additional vocabulary practice before reading the target passage.
  • In the Reading Zone, students complete multiple readings of the target passage, giving them the opportunity to build fluency, learn academic vocabulary, and practice reading comprehension strategies that are specifically applicable to the particular passage.
  • In the Language Zone, students build and expand their vocabulary knowledge through language-based activities.
  • In the Fluency Zone, students practice reading and spelling with a variety of words and patterns in order to automate these processes, which in turn will allow their cognitive resources to focus on higher-order comprehension tasks.
  • In the Writing Zone, students practice the writing strategies for narrative, informative, and argument writing that they have learned in Whole-Group and Small-Group lessons.
  • In the Success Zone, students build and apply the fluency and comprehension strategies they have learned and practiced in the other zones on discrepancy, context, and stretch passages.

Small-Group Learning: Students receive individualized, data-driven instruction that meets their unique learning needs while building meaningful relationships with their teachers. During text-based lessons in the ReaL Book, the teacher facilitates close reading explorations in small groups.

The teacher models essential reading strategies and then guides students in a collaborative analysis and discussion of the text. During writing lessons, the teacher guides student collaboration on writing tasks. Students are able to share ideas and give/receive feedback to/from their peers at all stages of the writing process. Evidence-based instructional routines build engagement and foster high-level thinking. Small-Group Learning is a true formative experience: the teacher has supports to quickly check student understanding during instruction as well as options to adjust instruction based on in-the-moment data.

Independent Reading: Students engage with complex, content-rich literature and informational texts that they can read with success. Students can apply comprehension strategies they are taught, including context clues, making inferences, cause and effect, and more.

The READ 180 Universal Independent Reading rotation is designed to foster accountable independent reading in students. Specifically, during Independent Reading, students complete graphic organizers and then take an HMH Reading Counts!® quiz. The library consists of print books and digital reads. The digital library consists of both eBooks and eReads, which are relevant, current, and engaging articles of differing modalities and length. The digital reading experience includes reading scaffolds with text-to-speech, zoom, highlight, and dictionary features. In addition, the READ 180 Universal library includes audiobooks in which an audio coach models fluent reading and reading-comprehension strategies throughout the text.

Station Rotations: After Whole-Group Learning, students rotate between Student App, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Reading stations at the teacher’s discretion. As students rotate through the stations, they receive explicit instruction, guided practice, and personalized feedback on the internalization of new content and learning strategies—and then reconvene for a Whole-Group Wrap-Up to reinforce what they have learned.

The READ 180 Universal Model for Blended Learning
Evidence Base

HMH is committed to developing innovative education programs that are grounded in research and supported by evidence that they work in practice. READ 180 Universal is built upon a foundation of more than 20 years of research and designed to be current through consultation with leading educational researchers, reading experts, and practitioners. The following section outlines the key components of READ 180 Universal’s evidence base.

Supporting All Students
Multi-Tiered System of Supports

To support students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs, many schools have adopted multi-tiered models of intervention that incorporate Response to Intervention (RTI) and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS).

Utilizing a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) creates a coherent continuum of evidence-based, system-wide practices that support a rapid response to the academic and behavioral needs of students. Within MTSS, there is frequent data-based monitoring to inform instructional decision making so as to empower all students to achieve high standards (Kansas TASN, 2008).

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a system that provides supports that increase in intensity, based on students’ behavioral and social needs. The purpose of PBIS is to take a proactive approach to addressing school discipline by promoting positive behaviors school-wide, identifying problem behaviors early, and responding to and reducing those behaviors through research-based instruction and intervention (Stewart et al., 2007).

At each level, key components of the model include clearly defined expectations explicitly taught to all students, opportunities for students to practice the skills, reinforcement for students who meet expectations, and a system for monitoring student progress (Lane, Robertson, & Graham-Bailey, 2006; Sugai et al., 2000).

Schools that have a culture that includes PBIS are able to establish the behavioral supports that are needed for all children to achieve both social and academic success. These schools have demonstrated increased achievement on both academic and social measures (Cohen, Kincaid, & Childs, 2007).

Effective PBIS implementations can be found in schools and districts that:

  • Foster positive social interactions between students, teachers, and administrators
  • Teach behavioral expectations in a socially- and age-appropriate way
  • Reinforce positive behavior with methods that are targeted toward students
  • Use implementation and student-level data to drive instruction and intervention (Bruhn, Hirsch, Gorsh, & Hannan, 2014)

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal can help educators meet the needs of students in both general education and special education through a Multi-Tiered System of Supports approach, which is a systematic framework for allocating instructional services and resources in response to students’ individual academic and behavioral needs. As illustrated in the figure below, MTSS employs a multi-tiered model of service delivery to promote efficient response to students’ needs. Each tier provides increasingly intensive support structure to ensure that students succeed.

Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Model

The READ 180 Universal instructional model supports multiple tiers by balancing whole-group instruction with small-group instruction that is targeted to different skills based on students’ needs. During whole-group instruction, the teacher focuses on macro-level skills that all students need. Then, students break into small groups to address their individual needs through adaptive instructional software, leveled books, and small-group direct instruction in reading.

While one small group works on the Student App that continuously assesses and provides targeted instruction, another group reads paperbacks and eReads independently at the appropriate reading level based on the Lexile® Framework for Reading. This instructional model allows teachers to work with a chosen small group to address individual needs based on assessment data.

The PBIS model, which is incorporated throughout READ 180 Universal, provides embedded supports and procedures for increasing student engagement, promoting positive behaviors, and motivating students to succeed. Instructional routines such as Oral Cloze, Think (Write)-Pair-Share, Idea Wave, Numbered Heads, and Peer Feedback encourage students to engage with the material with scaffolds that structure and support their responses. The instructional routines help to create a learning environment in which students can actively participate in a non-threatening and flexible way.

The READ 180 Universal instructional model supports multiple tiers by balancing whole-group instruction with small-group instruction that is targeted to different skills based on students’ needs. During whole-group instruction, the teacher focuses on macro-level skills that all students need. Then, students break into small groups to address their individual needs through adaptive instructional software, leveled books, and small-group direct instruction in reading.

While one small group works on the Student App that continuously assesses and provides targeted instruction, another group reads paperbacks and eReads independently at the appropriate reading level based on the Lexile® Framework for Reading. This instructional model allows teachers to work with a chosen small group to address individual needs based on assessment data.

The PBIS model, which is incorporated throughout READ 180 Universal, provides embedded supports and procedures for increasing student engagement, promoting positive behaviors, and motivating students to succeed. Instructional routines such as Oral Cloze, Think (Write)-Pair-Share, Idea Wave, Numbered Heads, and Peer Feedback encourage students to engage with the material with scaffolds that structure and support their responses. The instructional routines help to create a learning environment in which students can actively participate in a non-threatening and flexible way.

Universal Design for Learning

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a research-based framework that helps curriculum designers, teachers, and other educators create learning environments that are inclusive and effective for all learners. UDL was defined by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 as a scientifically valid framework for guiding educational practice that:

  • Provides flexibility in the ways information is presented, in the ways students respond or demonstrate knowledge and skills, and in the ways students are engaged
  • Reduces barriers in instruction; provides appropriate accommodations, supports and challenges; and maintains high achievement expectations for all students, including students with disabilities and students who are limited English proficient (Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. Public Law 110-315, 20 U.S.C & 1001)
  • Promotes the creation of flexible environments that provide students with a variety of options that allow them to reach their goals in multiple ways

Universal Design for Learning is primarily based upon three principles: Provide Multiple Means of Representation; Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression; and Provide Multiple Means of Engagement. These principles were derived from the three learning networks of the brain: Recognition Networks (the “what” of learning); Strategic Networks (the “how” of learning); and Affective Networks (the “why” of learning). Since at any given moment in learning all three networks are at play, the individual variation in all three networks must be considered during the planning or designing of technology (Center for Applied Special Technology [CAST], 2011).

The principles of UDL support providing multiple pathways for students to access and engage with content and demonstrate learning. Research reveals that UDL yields benefits, such as improved access to and participation in the general education curriculum for all students (National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2008).

Adaptive technology harnesses UDL principles in that it provides a flexible design from the start that has customizable options. This flexibility allows all learners to progress from where they are and not where we would have imagined them to be. In this way, all learners are provided with instruction that is varied and robust enough to be effective (CAST, 2011).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal instructional materials reflect the principles of UDL as they allow access to the content for students at all levels of learning. Individualized learning provided by adaptive technology, independent reading books, audiobooks, eReads, eBooks, Anchor Videos, and teacher-facilitated lessons provides students with the opportunity to access the content in an individualized way that suits their learning needs. In the digital independent reading experience, students can access additional supports such as text-to-speech, zoom, and highlight, as well as a dictionary.

READ 180 Universal offers students multiple means of expressing their learning through words and writing. With the Student Application (Student App), students read and record text passages to practice and demonstrate fluency. They are also given the opportunity to expand their comprehension of the texts they are reading on their own individual level. QuickWrites and graphic organizers help facilitate deeper understanding of the material. Assessments in both digital and print formats offer multiple means of expression for students to demonstrate what they are learning.

Students with Disabilities: Differentiated Supports

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-level system for maximizing student achievement by integrating ongoing assessment of student progress with increasingly intensive intervention (National Center on Response to Intervention, 2010). RTI organizes intervention into multiple tiers of increasingly intense interventions for those students not making adequate progress in Tier 1 (Feldman, 2009). Tier 2 and 3 interventions are intensified by increasing instructional time, decreasing group size, matching materials to students’ levels, modifying presentation modes, and providing corrective feedback.

RTI supports progress monitoring for all students. In all tiers of intervention, students benefit from teachers’ use of data to determine whether students are making the desired academic gains, and then whether they need modifications in their curricula, materials, or instruction (Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D., 2007; Duffy, 2008).

Collecting ongoing data on student progress is vital to documenting student growth, planning instruction, and determining the need for intervention (Fisher & Ivey, 2006; National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2008; Stecker, Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D., 2005; Torgesen, 2002). Streamlining the regular collection and examination of data, as well as modifying instruction based on what is learned from student data, can benefit all students and can be a powerful tool to help make a teacher’s job more efficient rather than more difficult (Duffy, 2008).

For students with disabilities, it is particularly important to use student performance assessment data to monitor progress in order to determine continuing instructional/remedial needs (National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2008).

Differentiated instruction meets students where they are—matching instruction to meet their assessed needs. Research demonstrates that differentiated instruction can significantly improve student achievement (Allan & Goddard, 2010). For students with disabilities, individually targeted instruction in reading skills can improve reading achievement, both in the targeted skill and in more generalized measures of literacy (Shanahan, 2008; Vaughn & Denton, 2008).

In a recent research synthesis by Wanzek and colleagues, strong evidence was found to support three instructional recommendations for students with reading difficulties in Grades 4 to 12: 1) Provide explicit vocabulary instruction; 2) Use direct and explicit comprehension strategy instruction; and 3) Provide struggling readers with intensive and individualized interventions. From this finding, the authors recommended intensive intervention efforts for students with reading difficulties in Grades 4 through 12 who do not perform at or near grade level, and supplemental, small-group instruction for extended periods of time (Wanzek, Vaughn, Scammacca, Metz, Murray, Roberts, & Danielson, 2013).

Teachers who rely mostly on whole-group instruction do not adequately meet the individual needs of students who need extra literacy support. Instead, teachers can use performance data to form small groups of students and teach lessons to target their specific skill needs. Students with disabilities particularly benefit from this type of targeted intensive instruction in small and flexible groups (Avalos, 2006).

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) models provide clearly defined expectations explicitly taught to all students, opportunity for students to practice the skills, reinforcement for students who meet expectations, and a system for monitoring student progress (Lane, Robertson, & Graham-Bailey, 2006; Sugai & Horner, 2002). PBIS models have been found to be particularly effective in helping students with emotional and behavioral challenges stay on track and experience success (Sugai, Sprague, & Horner, 1999).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal can help educators meet the needs of students with disabilities through a Response to Intervention (RTI) approach, which is a systematic framework for allocating instructional services and resources in response to students’ individual needs. An RTI framework employs a multi-tiered model of service delivery to promote efficient response to students’ needs. Each tier provides increasingly intensive support structure to ensure that students succeed.

Response to Intervention (RTI) Framework

The READ 180 Universal instructional model supports multiple tiers by balancing whole-group instruction with small-group instruction that is targeted to different skills based on students’ needs. During whole-group instruction, the teacher focuses on macro-level skills that all students need. Then, students break into small groups to address their individual needs through adaptive instructional software, leveled books, and small-group direct instruction in reading, writing, language development, and comprehension. While one small group works on the Student App that continuously assesses and provides targeted instruction, another group reads paperbacks, eReads, eBooks, and listens to audio books independently at the appropriate reading level based on the Lexile® Framework for Reading. This instructional model allows teachers to group students to address individual needs based on assessment data.

The READ 180 Universal software offers powerful tools for the systematic screening and progress monitoring that are central to an RTI approach, along with customizable training and professional development to ensure that teachers can use the program effectively with a wide array of students, including students with disabilities.

Independent Reading eBooks and eReads provide numerous supports to help students with disabilities as they read independently. Those supports include a text-to-speech feature, a zoom feature, a digital dictionary, and a highlighting feature. In addition, audiobooks feature a reading coach, a narrator who provides comprehension strategies and models fluent reading respectively. During Independent Reading, students may also express their learning through book conferences with the teacher, and collaboration and presentation projects.

Following a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) model, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and RTI are integrated throughout READ 180 Universal to provide embedded procedures for increasing student engagement, promoting positive behaviors, and motivating students to succeed. Instructional routines such as Oral Cloze, Think (Write)-Pair-Share, and Peer Feedback encourage students to engage with the material with scaffolds that structure and support their responses. The instructional routines help to create a learning environment in which students can actively participate in a nonthreatening and flexible way.

Supports for Students with Specific Disabilities

Of the 6.7 million students enrolled in special education programs, 41% have been identified as having a specific learning disability (Snyder, Dillow, & Hoffman, 2008).

It is estimated that a full 80% of those with specific learning disabilities (or 4.6% of the total public school population) have a primary disability in reading. Furthermore, research suggests that another 15–20% of the total school population exhibit symptoms of dyslexia, such as difficulty with reading, writing, or spelling, even though they may not receive special education services (International Dyslexia Association (IDA), 2007; Shaywitz, 2003).

Dyslexia is a language-based disability that affects both oral and written language. It may also be referred to as a reading disability. The most common educational difficulties experienced by students with dyslexia are in the areas of decoding, spelling, communicating ideas through writing, and reading comprehension (Shaywitz, 2003).

Increasingly, schools are using RTI to identify students with dyslexia. In the RTI process, school personnel monitor students’ responsiveness to tiers of intensive, targeted reading instruction. If a student does not meet performance benchmarks with the intervention and other developmental disorders are ruled out, then the student may be identified as having a reading disability. Based on the diagnosis, teachers can then tailor the reading intervention to the student’s particular instructional needs (Shaywitz, Morris, & Shaywitz, 2008).

According to Shaywitz (2003), effective intervention programs for students with reading disabilities:

  • Provide systematic, direct instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics
  • Teach students to apply these skills to reading and writing
  • Provide fluency training
  • Include rich experiences listening to and using oral language

For all students, especially those with reading difficulties, speech/sound blending supports word recognition, spelling supports vocabulary, understanding of morphology supports word recognition, and oral language capacities are the underpinning for written language (Moats, 2012). Additionally, for students with dyslexia, help with handwriting, spelling, and sentence composition support higher-level composition (Berninger & Wolf, 2009).

Interventions for students with dyslexia should be systematic, explicit, and multisensory. Many individuals with dyslexia require one-on-one help so that they can move forward at their own pace. In addition, students with dyslexia often need a great deal of structured practice and immediate, corrective feedback to develop automatic word recognition skills (IDA, 2012).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

In READ 180 Universal, extensive phonics instruction is provided through individualized, modeled practice in structural analysis and continued work on phoneme articulation, coupled with immediate, corrective feedback. Modeled examples of correct articulation of sounds are further presented in READ 180 Universal audiobooks and during teacher-led instruction. A Smart Coach on the audiobooks models fluency, comprehension, vocabulary, and self-monitoring strategies at important points during reading. Students thus experience firsthand the strategies of a good reader throughout the supported reading of each grade- and age-appropriate book.

READ 180 Universal offers students multiple means of expressing their learning through words and writing. In the software, students read and record text passages to practice and demonstrate fluency. All software and audiobooks include writing prompts and graphic organizers to allow students to show comprehension in a way that suits their needs. In addition, writing prompts are provided in the Writing Zone of the Student App. Assessments in both digital and print format offer multiple means for students to demonstrate their knowledge.

READ 180 Universal instructional materials are designed with the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to facilitate access to the curriculum for all students by individualizing and differentiating instruction according to students’ reading levels, skills proficiency, and interests.

A multisensory instructional approach allows for multiple means of representation of learning materials. For example, the software, independent reading books, audiobooks, Anchor Videos, ReaL Book, and teacher-directed lessons offer variety as a means of accessing lesson content. In addition, the Student App includes captioning of Anchor Videos, an alternate color scheme, and a button rollover feature that provides a text label for the Student App buttons.

READ 180 Universal content consistently presents images, graphics, and sound alongside printed and electronic text, providing daily opportunities for different types of learners to engage their visual, auditory, and tactile senses.

Differentiated Supports for English Learners

The number of English learners in U.S. schools has grown by over 50% in the past decade. Current estimations of English learners in U.S. schools are 5.3 million students, a significant number. While this has brought challenges to meeting the needs of these students, it has also brought an opportunity to embrace multicultural and multilingual education and an increased focus on improving instruction for English learners (George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education, 2009).

The proportion of English learners that live in California is approximately 34% of the national total, and California has more English learners than the next six states combined. Approximately 25% of California’s students are English learners. English learners must meet the same challenging standards as native speakers of English, and many are at risk in US schools, which typically do not successfully differentiate instruction to meet their unique and varied needs (California Department of Education, 2010).

A recent review of best practices for “Teaching Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School” conducted by the Institute of Education Sciences resulted in four recommendations:

  • Teach a set of academic vocabulary words intensively across several days using a variety of instructional activities.
  • Integrate oral and written English language instruction into content-area teaching.
  • Provide regular, structured opportunities to develop written language skills.
  • Provide small-group instructional intervention to students struggling in areas of literacy and English language development.

The research on effective instruction for English learners points to three important principles: generally effective practices are likely to be effective with English learners; English learners require additional instructional supports; and the home language can be used to promote academic development. Additionally, English learners need plenty of opportunities to develop proficiency in English (Goldenberg, 2013).

In a study of high-performing schools with large populations of English learners, four broad, effective practices were identified as having the most significant positive correlation with high test scores: implementing a coherent, standards-based curriculum and instructional program; prioritizing student achievement; ensuring availability of instructional resources; and using assessment data to improve student achievement and instruction (Williams, Hakuta, Haertel et al., 2007).

For mixed-ability classes including English learners, providing explicit, interactive instruction results in the greatest text comprehension gains, especially when the instruction relates the academic vocabulary words in the text to focal lesson concepts or when the words have general use in academic contexts (Kinsella, 2013).

Students need to be reading not only deeply but widely and building their vocabulary and knowledge (Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2002; Feldman & Kinsella, 2005). Wide reading is particularly important for English learners, who benefit from learning word meanings in context rather than as separate lists of words (Au, 1993).

Because academic language proficiency is related to achievement in reading and writing, direct instruction in oral and written academic language for English learners is critical (Biancarosa & Snow, 2004; Gersten & Baker, 2000). For example, teaching vocabulary and grammar as it is used in specific genres prepares English learners to succeed with academic writing tasks (Schleppegrell, 1998).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

In a sense, all students are English learners, as they all come to school with different experiences and levels of exposure to the English language. READ 180 Universal is designed to differentiate instruction and meet all English learners at their levels, whether they are speakers of other languages or other dialects such as nonstandard English, while being respectful of their first language. READ 180 Universal helps teachers to capitalize on the advantages that English learners bring to the classroom and the support that using their first language judiciously can provide. By focusing on understanding register and academic language, the program helps students build upon their native languages and dialects and provides them the scaffolding and supports they need to “put miles on the tongue” and use academic language effectively.

Throughout READ 180 Universal, program materials reflect a consideration for the needs of English learners. The program was designed with the recognition that focusing on the needs of English learners highlights important elements of reading instruction, such as building background knowledge and developing academic vocabulary, that are beneficial to all READ 180 Universal users.

READ 180 Universal includes many supports that are beneficial to English learners who are struggling with reading comprehension and fluency. All English learners can benefit from the individualized instruction provided by the Student Application (Student App), along with immediate corrective feedback that has been found to be particularly helpful to non-native English speakers. The Student App also provides vocabulary supports, captioning of Anchor Videos, supports in the eReads and parent materials for five major world languages spoken in California (Spanish, Vietnamese, Filipino, Cantonese, and Mandarin), and Spanish translations that can help students with beginning and intermediate English proficiency levels access the texts, build background knowledge, and experience success.

The program’s emphasis on developing academic language and vocabulary reflects practices that have been shown to be particularly effective for English learners, who may struggle with academic language even if they are comfortable with conversational English. Similarly, English learners benefit from supported practice with speaking and listening in the classroom and opportunities to collaborate and discuss concepts with peers. The program’s instructional routines, such as Think (Write)-Pair-Share, scaffold classroom discussion so that English learners can feel more comfortable participating. Like native English speakers, English learners are able to apply and practice their learned skills with audiobooks and independent reading books that are leveled so that students can experience frequent success with reading. In addition, students have the opportunity to practice their oral language skills during independent reading book conferences and during collaboration and presentation projects. Projects are assigned at the teacher’s direction and may include debates, research projects, multimedia presentations, choral reading, writing dialogue, and more. The multicultural content found across all components of READ 180 Universal reflects ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity, helping English learners find a sense of belonging in their new culturally responsive environment.

Assessment Of and For Learning

As technological and learning advances are increasingly being made, we are at the beginning of what is surely to be the most important, turbulent, and exciting decade in the century for innovations in assessment. Four major forces are pushing these innovations along: technological, social, and economic trends are changing the skills needed for citizenship and employment; the power of personal digital and computing devices and the number of people with daily access to them are increasing exponentially; cognitive science is creating new and powerful insights into how people learn; and the demand for K–12 education learning and assessment tools in the United States is reaching explosive levels that will spur greater investment and innovation (Doorey, 2012).

Effective assessments allow educators to make important claims about the knowledge and skills that students possess. Literacy assessments can enable educators to determine whether students can read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts, to determine whether they can write effectively when analyzing text, and to determine their overall literacy proficiency (Gendron, 2012).

Assessment systems can provide a balanced way to give teachers and schools the information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning so that all students leave high school ready for college and career. Balanced assessment systems include formative assessment practices that improve instruction; interim assessments that are flexible and open and are used for actionable feedback; and summative assessments that are benchmarked to college and career readiness (Gendron, 2012).

Shepherd and Marzola (2011) found that teachers who incorporated formative assessments into their lessons increased student reading achievement scores more than teachers who did not use formative assessments. Chatterji, Koh, Choi, and Iyengar (2009) also found that their researcher-developed formative assessment, the Proximal Assessment for Learner Diagnosis (PALD), was effective for addressing learner needs and thus closing achievement gaps in subject-area domains.

While formative assessments are beneficial for all students, they are particularly helpful for struggling students as they highlight troublesome areas and provide guidance on what needs to be done to overcome them (Black & William, 2009).

Schools that embrace a student-centered learning approach emphasize instruction and assessment that help students connect with and apply what they are learning through culminating performance-based assessments. These schools utilize ongoing, performance-based assessments that focus on mastery. Student-centered schools are more likely to outperform peers on standardized assessments, graduate more students, help more students become eligible for college, and have students that persist in college (Friedlaender et al., 2014).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal contains a comprehensive system to administer and give actionable feedback for both formative assessments (for learning) and summative assessments (of learning). The READ 180 Universal assessment system provides ongoing information for students, teachers, and administrators throughout the year about student learning and progress.

READ 180 Universal assessments include tools to screen and place students, monitor progress, and provide information that can be used to inform instruction. READ 180 Universal teachers use HMH Reading Inventory, a scientifically based and validated test, as a screening assessment in the beginning of the year and as a progress-monitoring assessment in the middle and end of the year. The Reading Inventory Lexile measure is one of several data points that are used to inform the students’ learner profiles. Other contributions to the learner profile include the students’ interests, their engagement and motivation that are tracked through the Student Application (Student App), and their performance on the Workshop assessments, on HMH Reading Counts! Independent Reading quizzes, and in the Student App.

In addition to HMH Reading Inventory, READ 180 Universal includes multiple formal and informal formative assessments to monitor student progress on an ongoing basis. Students can take Interim and End-of-Workshop Assessments during and after each of six Workshops in the ReaL Book to assess progress in using reading strategies for comprehension. The tests include item formats that students will encounter on Next Generation assessments so that students will develop strategies for attacking these challenging formats and practice the kinds of thinking these items demand. Students may also take Summative Tests at midyear and end of year to assess listening and reading comprehension, critical reading, word-study skills, conventions, and writing. Reading Counts! quizzes assess students’ comprehension of paperbacks, audiobooks, and eReads that they complete during Independent Reading.

Critical thinking and 21st century skills are assessed at the end of every Workshop, through Projects that assess students’ abilities to apply 21st century skills such as analyzing information, using technology for communication, and engaging in collaborative work. In the ReaL Book, students have the opportunity to rate their own essays and research papers using scoring rubrics before they reflect and revise them for submission. Scoring rubrics are also used in the Respond & Write activities in the Writing Zone. These scoring guides support students and teachers in reviewing students’ work, providing feedback, and revising as necessary.

Technology plays an important role in the READ 180 Universal assessment system. READ 180 Universal’s adaptive technology provides students with personalized feedback and teachers with a powerful tool for progress monitoring as it continuously collects data on students’ growth and mastery of new skills that feeds into the students’ learner profiles. HMH Teacher Central provides easy access to data from these ongoing assessments, allowing teachers and administrators to efficiently monitor student progress in real time, quickly identify problems, and inform decision making about instruction.

All READ 180 Universal students complete interim and end-of-year performance assessments that take place after Workshop 3 and Workshop 6. These performance assessments are research projects in which the students choose a topic, research and evaluate sources, and use the process and strategies they have learned for informative writing to write a research paper.

Blended Learning Solutions
Personalized Instruction with Adaptive Technology

Well-designed blended learning solutions offer many positive benefits for struggling students, including for those with disabilities and English learners. Five aspects of technology that can be game changers for students are that it is:

  1. Adaptive
  2. Effective at facilitating practice that leads to mastery
  3. Available anytime and anywhere
  4. Effective at gathering and processing data
  5. Motivating (Hasselbring, 2012)

Adaptive technology harnesses Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles in that it provides a flexible design from the start that has customizable options. This flexibility allows all learners to progress from where they are and not where we would have imagined them to be. In this way, all learners are provided with instruction that is varied and robust enough to be effective (CAST, 2011).

The motivating potential of technology, especially for students with disabilities and English learners, is very promising. For almost everyone, especially students caught in a cycle of failure, success is a tremendous motivator. Many technology-based programs are able to process data and point out improvements in even very small increments. Seeing these improvements is incredibly motivating for students who feel they have never experienced success in school (Hasselbring & Bausch, 2005).

Adaptive technology affords students with disabilities and English learners the opportunity to receive individualized supports, learn at their own pace, and receive corrective feedback in real time (Kamil, 2003). Individually targeted instruction in reading skills can improve reading achievement, both in the targeted skill and in more generalized measures of literacy (Shanahan, 2008; Vaughn & Denton, 2008).

Many technology-based programs allow teachers to look up the day-to-day progress of students, see which concepts are holding them back, and then use that information to create an individualized learning plan. When a student spends just a small amount of time using the right kind of software, technology-based programs can quickly assess the student’s skill set, organize the data, and deliver customized data to the teacher, parent, or student (Hasselbring, 2010). A recent report (RAND, 2014) found that students in charter schools that had implemented personalized learning programs improved in reading and math over the national average on standardized tests.

A recent report from the Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE) cited three factors that affect the achievement of at-risk adolescent students that use educational technology: the interactive nature of the technology, the ability of the technology to encourage students to explore and create rather than repetitively practice skills, and effective interaction between teachers and the technology (Darling-Hammond, Zielezinski, & Goldman, 2014).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal’s innovative technology harnesses learning theory and pedagogical principles to deliver individualized and personalized instruction tailored to each student’s needs and interests. The adaptive technology embedded into the Student Application (Student App) customizes and scaffolds individual practice and application of word recognition, spelling, vocabulary, language, fluency, comprehension, and writing skills. The adaptive pacing of skills practice in the Student App helps students achieve automaticity, freeing cognitive capacity for higher-order processes. In addition, embedded assessments throughout the Student App are designed to continuously assess and place students according to their levels of mastery of learned and new information, and to customize corrective feedback to students’ specific errors.

The power of READ 180 Universal’s technology is that it enables the program to assess student knowledge and skills, respond to individual student differences, differentiate and scaffold instruction, provide corrective feedback, monitor student progress, and offer teachers data to guide students to become proficient readers and learners. These characteristics constitute instructional practices that have been shown to be highly beneficial to struggling readers, students with disabilities, and English learners.

READ 180 Universal builds a Learner Profile that takes into consideration the students’ mastery of academic skills (measured through their performance on reading comprehension, fluency, word recognition, language/vocabulary, spelling, and writing activities) as well as their academic mindset (measured through their usage and activity in the Student App and help-seeking and challenge-seeking behaviors). The Learner Profile is informed by the FASTT algorithm to consistently provide students with instruction and practice on skills and strategies within their zone of proximal development. In addition, advances in speech recognition technology enable the Student App to monitor their behaviors and provide feedback to ensure that students stay on task.

Blended Learning in the Classroom

Blended learning can be described both as a formal education program in which a student learns through online delivery of content and instruction while having some control over time, place, path, and/or pace, and as a supervised education program that occurs in a “brick-and-mortar” location (Staker & Horn, 2012).

Providing a fundamental redesign of instructional models, blended learning seeks to accelerate learning toward college and career readiness. The goal is to develop schools that are more productive for both students and teachers by personalizing instruction. In this way, blended learning can ensure that the most appropriate resources and interventions are available for students at the time that they need them (Bailey, Ellis, Schneider, & Vander Ark, 2013).

Blended learning has the potential to bring accessibility, affordability, and customization that might have previously been complicated, expensive, and standardized to educational places. In this way, it can transform learning experiences for students (Staker et al., 2011).

Blended learning that integrates face-to-face and digital learning can lead to greater educational equity, opportunities, and efficiencies for students. As we use technology and digital devices regularly in order to function in our personal and professional lives, it is reasonable to integrate these same resources into educational environments (Anderson & Skrzypchak, 2011).

Models of blended learning that follow a hybrid pattern build upon and offer sustaining enhancements to a regular classroom system while not disrupting it. Other models of blended learning that are more disruptive can transform the classroom system by becoming engines of change over the longer term (Horn & Staker, 2014).

In a membership survey of teachers from all 50 states, the Association of American Educators found that 92% of teachers report utilizing technology in the classroom and 68% of teachers “support a blended learning environment where students spend part of their day with a teacher and part of their day working with a computer” (Association of American Educators, 2015).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

In the READ 180 Universal blended learning model, students interact with their teachers, peers, and adaptive technology. Starting with Whole-Group Learning, students then move to Small-Group Learning (in which they work with their teacher and a consumable workbook), the Student App (in which students work with technology that adapts to and assesses their reading and comprehension levels), and Independent Reading (where students work both on- and off-line with reading books that meet their interests and levels).

All READ 180 Universal teachers have access to HMH Teacher Central, which provides unprecedented support for monitoring learning and differentiating instruction—critical to effective intervention. Through HMH Teacher Central, the teacher can:

  • Instantly access real-time data about student performance
  • Analyze data and results to inform effective instruction
  • Access guidance on reviewing and reteaching skills based on data
  • Use the grouping tool to group students for differentiated instruction tailored to their needs
  • Access rubrics and grade student performance on writing assignments and fluency readings
  • Access dynamic, daily Professional Learning resources
  • Participate in a community of educators and access all resources through an educative curriculum

The READ 180 Universal Student App complements teacher-led Whole- and Small-Group Learning with activities that customize and scaffold individual skills practice. Students are able to choose their path through the Student App and work at their own pace, two factors that are critical to an effective blended learning program. The Student App also continuously collects data about student performance and provides continual personalized feedback to the student, freeing the teacher to focus on targeted direct instruction for the Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning.

Other features of READ 180 Universal technology also help teachers collect and manage data, providing them more time for face-to-face teaching. For example, the adaptive Reading Inventory assessment screens students and provides a Lexile measure that teachers can use to efficiently match students with texts. This data not only provides a personalized path through the Student App, but also allows the teacher to differentiate instruction during Small-Group Learning.

Building Deep Background and Content Knowledge

People construct new knowledge and understandings based on their existing knowledge (Bransford et al., 2000). Research shows that background knowledge is critical to reading proficiency (Adams, 2009; Lee & Spratley, 2010; Torgesen et al., 2007). Knowledge of subject matter is necessary in order to understand what is read (Hirsch & Pondiscio, 2010).

Content knowledge and reading are inextricably intertwined—reading will never progress beyond decoding without a foundation of content knowledge. The ability to comprehend a text depends greatly on the knowledge of the subject that the reader brings to that text. A program that enriches the knowledge of students is a must for reading improvement (Hirsch, 2014).

In order to build content knowledge, students must read an adequate number of high-quality, complex, and engaging texts that allow them to study a topic for a sustained period of time. Infusing these content-rich texts into the English Language Arts curriculum allows students to spend an extended part of the school day not only reading, but also gaining knowledge that will allow them to read more complex texts in the future (Wattenberg, 2014).

Some students face barriers to learning because the representation of information assumes certain critical background knowledge and content knowledge. Since there is such a wide range of individual differences among students, ensuring that all students have equal opportunities to learn requires providing options and alternatives, such as videos that anchor instruction (CAST, 2011).

Within software, both direct, explicit instruction and providing structured problem-solving guidance can be effective at enhancing anchored instruction, each at different levels depending on the complexity of the task. The most effective interactive learning environments take into consideration the needs of a particular situation (Zydney, Bathke, & Hasselbring, 2014).

Dynamic images and sounds are especially helpful for students with limited background knowledge and for English learners (Hasselbring & Glaser, 2000; Lacina, 2004). Using multiple representations of video information with struggling students gives them an authentic base of experience in abstract domains, thus making the abstract information more concrete (Heo, 2007).

Mini-anchors may be a valuable approach to use for creating adaptable learning environments. They serve as a prescription for how to individualize instruction by embedding multiple, short, video-based scenarios within a computer-based program. In this way, mini anchors provide learners with multiple ways to perceive, engage with, and interact with instructional content (Zydney, Bathke, & Hasselbring, 2014).

Successful readers have a strong vocabulary, background knowledge on a diversity of topics, and fluency that allows them to focus on the meaning of the text. These readers gain exponentially more vocabulary, knowledge, and fluency as they read, which allows them to read more texts and build their knowledge base even more. Struggling readers continue to fall further and further behind because they can’t access the knowledge and understanding of successful readers. This rich-get-richer and poor-get-poorer outcome is known as the Matthew Effect (Stanovich, 1986). Without early and effective intervention, struggling readers never gain the background knowledge they need to be effective readers and only fall further and further behind.

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal is designed to help students acquire and activate the background and content knowledge that is essential to reading comprehension. Before reading a text in a Workshop or in the Student Application (Student App), students watch an Anchor Video that provides them with the content and vocabulary knowledge they need to comprehend the text. These Anchor Videos not only contribute immediately to improved comprehension of the texts that students read, but also give students knowledge that they can transfer to unfamiliar texts, allowing them to build more knowledge and continue to read more in a virtuous cycle.

At the core of READ 180 Universal are multitudes of informational texts that stretch across the content areas, such as social studies, science, literature and the arts, and contemporary social issues in order to build the domain knowledge that is critical to reading comprehension. By spending an extended period of time within a Knowledge Cluster, students are able to develop the knowledge that comes from deep and meaningful study of a topic. Through this engaging, diverse content, READ 180 Universal readings help students develop the strong base of world knowledge and interdisciplinary literacy skills that they need in order to better comprehend texts across the curriculum.

READ 180 Universal makes systematic and extensive use of mental models to help students build background knowledge and improve comprehension of texts. READ 180 Universal exposes students to multiple text types in order to build students’ world knowledge and prepare them to comprehend across the content areas. The content in all components of READ 180 Universal reflects diverse perspectives, allowing students to both reflect on their own experiences and explore new concepts and points of view.

The Anchor Videos included in the READ 180 Universal Student App and Workshops introduce students to the concepts and vocabulary they will need to access the related text passages. The videos and subsequent language development activities aid students in developing a mental picture of what they are about to read, resulting in improved comprehension. The combination of video and vocabulary support is especially helpful for English learners who may have gaps in context information and/or academic language.

READ 180 Universal teacher-led instruction further supports the building of background knowledge to enhance comprehension. HMH Teacher Central includes specific instructional routines to prepare students for reading, such as the Academic Discussion routine which helps build background about a particular concept that is critical to the Workshop texts. As part of this routine, students brainstorm, write, exchange, record, and report on their ideas. Students also use the Vocabulary routine to learn key content-area vocabulary words that appear in subsequent texts. This routine enables students to learn new themes, discuss examples, and practice using the vocabulary prior to encountering these words in texts. In addition, Resources for Differentiated Instruction in HMH Teacher Central include  lessons that teachers can use to build students’ background knowledge and promote mental model development during Whole-Group Instruction.

The Language and Literacy Imperative
The Reading Brain

Five principles help to explain the relationship between students’ brains and the task of learning to read:

  1. The brain forms new circuits for written language from older genetic processes like vision, language, cognition, and emotional systems.
  2. The development of these circuits depends on the language environment and the particular writing system.
  3. Neurons are reprogrammed to form the reading circuits.
  4. The more readers know about words and about how words function within sentences and stories, the faster a reading circuit is strengthened.
  5. Reading is ultimately about going beyond the text to make connections to one’s experiences and thoughts (Wolf, 2013).

Comprehending text involves disparate processes, from perceiving words, to identifying text structures, to understanding the relationships between characters in a story. These processes are associated with activation in different parts of the brain. Neuroscience research has found that, when a student reads about an action or emotion, the activation in the brain is consistent with the student experiencing that action or emotion. For example, when a student reads about a character riding a bike, the parts of the brain responsible for helping the student ride a bike are activated (Rose, 2014; Wehbe et al., 2014).

Activation patterns in the brains of good readers and struggling readers differ dramatically. The reading circuits in the brains of struggling readers are more scattered and less established than in the brains of good readers. But research has demonstrated that intensive instruction in and deliberate practice of reading skills and strategies can change the way that struggling readers’ brains work.

Comprehension occurs as a cluster of skills that develop simultaneously. Among these skills are higher-order processes, such as inference generation and reasoning, that allow readers to recognize meaningful relationships among text elements and between text elements and background knowledge (Kendeou, van den Broek, White, & Lynch, 2009; Cutting & Scarborough, 2006).

Systematic instruction and practice help students learn executive function skills such as setting goals, planning, organizing and prioritizing materials, managing time, being cognitively flexible, self-monitoring, and self-reflecting (Meltzer, 2007). Neuroscientific brain research shows that when students understand the goals of their work, they are more likely to stay focused, self-monitor, and appreciate their own progress (Medina, 2014; Rose, Meyer, Strangman, & Rappolt, 2002).

Reading aloud to students exposes them to a broader vocabulary of words in a different “voice,” brings students and teachers together in a communal way, and allows the brain to have new experiences and imagine different worlds in which people react in different ways to different situations (Medina, 2014).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal instruction incorporates the latest research and principles of how the brain learns to read. The content within the program engages and motivates students, resulting in activation of disparate parts of the brain that are vital to reading with comprehension. READ 180 Universal is a comprehensive reading intervention that addresses the needs of struggling readers and provides instruction, support, and practice in the areas that are most needed for each individual student. The authors of the program carefully considered the strengths and weaknesses of specific student populations and designed instruction that will meet their needs at a variety of levels. Data from assessments and the Student Application (Student App) rotation are leveraged to identify students’ specific needs, strengths, and interests to target instruction in the areas that students need assistance.

Anchor Videos activate and strengthen vocabulary and background knowledge circuits in the brain, allowing students to comprehend and link passages to their existing knowledge. Structured practice in decoding, encoding, and reading words fluently allows students to automate those processes and focus their cognitive attention on the difficult work of comprehending complex text. The engaging and motivating texts that students encounter encourage them to work through their struggles and persist even when the passage is challenging.

Engineered to unlock the science behind reading success, READ 180 Universal incorporates the latest research on how the brain learns to read. Scientists use neuroimaging to map different areas of the brain, highlighting the interweaving of language, word-recognition, executive function skills, and the social-emotional state.
Language Development

Language should be used in the classroom to bridge information gaps, to communicate ideas and information, and to “get things done.” The purpose of language is to communicate in real-life ways. To meet rigorous standards, students need to learn how to use language to clearly communicate their ideas around what they are learning (Zwiers, 2014).

Academic language refers to the form of the English language that is expected in situations such as the discussion of topics across the curriculum, making arguments, defending propositions, and synthesizing information. Written and spoken academic discussion is significantly different from informal discussion as academic language is characterized by specific types of vocabulary, text structures, and grammatical structures (Dutro & Kinsella, 2010; Snow, 2002).

Instruction for English learners should emphasize academic language, specifically the specialized language associated with academic instruction and content areas. Students that receive instruction in and are able to use decontextualized academic language are more likely to be successful than students who use contextualized social language (California Department of Education, 2010).

Research shows that there is a strong reciprocal relationship between reading comprehension and knowledge of both conversational and academic language (Baumann, Kame’enui, & Ash, 2003; Duke & Pearson, 2002).

The interaction between academic language and academic content is a great challenge for English learners, thus contributing to gaps in achievement between English learners and English-proficient students (Anstrom, DiCerbo, Butler, Katz, Millet, & Rivera, 2010). English learners bring meaningful experiences and content knowledge to the classroom that can be leveraged to accelerate their language development. Expert opinion supports incorporating structured peer discussions around relevant content-area literacy instruction so that students have multiple opportunities to practice and hear academic language, which is especially important for English learners and those who speak nonstandard dialects of English (Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2002; Dutro & Kinsella, 2010).

To add new academic words to their expressive vocabularies, students need structured classroom contexts that offer frequent and accountable opportunities to use the new terminology in their speaking, listening, and writing (Feldman & Kinsella, 2008).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to developing the language skills of students. Through carefully scaffolded reading, writing, and speaking activities, students learn the phonological, morphological, syntactical, and semantic structures of English—particularly academic English. In Whole- and Small-Group Learning, high-utility academic vocabulary is taught through a research-based instructional routine, promoting understanding of words that students will encounter in all subject areas.

In each Whole- and Small-Group lesson, teachers teach and assess two or three language goals focused on vocabulary, language functions, and language of reading, writing, and speaking. Language functions stem from the linguistic demands of a lesson task and focus on high-leverage language that will serve students in other contexts. Across the year in READ 180 Universal, students develop expressive language skills to:

  • Discuss
  • Reflect
  • Compare/Contrast
  • Collaborate
  • Exchange Ideas
  • Report
  • Offer Feedback
  • Make Connections/Associations

READ 180 Universal also provides explicit and systematic instruction through Whole- and Small-Group Learning in word learning strategies, giving students the tools they need to learn new words independently. Recursive vocabulary in reading selections encourages frequent review, practice, and reinforcement of targeted words. Independent reading materials in READ 180 Universal provide further exposure to increasingly advanced vocabulary and include supports such as graphic organizers to help students comprehend the vocabulary and content.

At the beginning of each segment of the Student Application (Student App), students complete the Explore Zone. In the Explore Zone, students are introduced to context-relevant vocabulary words in the Anchor Video and then complete activities that activate their vocabulary and real-world knowledge before reading the passage. During the Language Zone of Student App, students build and expand their academic vocabulary knowledge through language-based activities that investigate word families, words in context, synonyms and antonyms, and examples and non-examples. Students complete practice activities using definitions and context sentences for each word—crucial supports that can help struggling readers and English learners alike acquire vocabulary as they read. In the Reading Zone, students practice words-in-context skills during the Close Read activity, which includes words-in-context questions for three power words per level.

In the READ 180 Universal ReaL Book, students have the opportunity to practice the academic language they have learned in Whole- and Small-Group Learning in discussions with their peers. These discussions help to develop students’ oral language skills using the language of school. Giving students time to practice and develop oral language is especially helpful for those students who are struggling readers, English learners, and students with disabilities.

Foundations for Reading

Learning to read skillfully is a complex process that begins with foundational literacy skills. When these foundational skills have been strategically and automatically mastered, skilled reading with comprehension can occur. As the research shows, students’ knowledge of the correspondence between sounds and spellings determines their ability to read single words with speed and accuracy, which in turn predicts their ability to read and comprehend texts (Adams & Bruck, 1995; Scarborough, 2002; Wagner, 2008).

Struggling readers are likely to suffer from deficits in phonemic awareness and phonological processing. These deficits may not be evident until the third or fourth grade and are likely to impede reading ability throughout the student’s lifespan without intervention (Lipka, Lesaux, & Siegel, 2006).

Direct instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics improves word recognition skills, which in turn improves reading comprehension. Explicit and systematic literacy instruction that focuses on foundational skills taught in the context of meaningful, level-appropriate text has proven especially important to improved reading abilities for struggling readers and students with disabilities (Adams, 1990; National Early Literacy Panel, 2008; National Reading Panel, 2000; National Research Council, 1998).

Multisensory learning approaches allow students to master the foundational literacy skills necessary for comprehension. Providing direct, systematic, sequential, and cumulative instruction in phonology and phonological awareness, sound-symbol association, syllable instruction, morphology, syntax, and comprehension allows for the fluency and automaticity of word recognition required for skilled reading (Birsh, 2011; McIntyre & Pickering, 1995).

Foundational reading instruction should be integrated with opportunities to read meaningful connected text as part of a coherent instructional approach (Adams, 1990; Moats, 2012; Strickland, 2011).

Rigorous state standards stress that “foundational skills are not an end in and of themselves; rather, they are necessary and important components of an effective, comprehensive reading program designed to develop proficient readers with the capacity to comprehend text across a range of types and disciplines” (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010, p. 15).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

Each Workshop in READ 180 Universal begins with a text designed to allow students to practice and build fluency. This text is written with decodable words, sight words, and other elements that make the text considerate—and includes foundational skills instruction and practice to help students automate the word recognition and reading processes. The Workshop fluency texts provide practice and reinforce skills and patterns that students learn on the Student Application (Student App) as they build reading fluency.

READ 180 Universal provides explicit, systematic instruction in the research-based foundational and higher-order comprehension skills and strategies necessary for understanding text. These skills and strategies, from word decoding to making inferences, are modeled in Whole and Small Groups, practiced in the Student App, and applied during Independent Reading.

HMH Teacher Central guides teachers in leading Whole- and Small-Group Learning in which they teach, model, and guide practice in comprehension and critical-thinking skills and strategies, using a wide range of expository and narrative texts. A gradual release approach is used throughout READ 180 Universal teacher-led instruction and in the Student App, which provides scaffolding for students as they learn to internalize comprehension skills and strategies.

READ 180 Universal instruction is designed to systematically bolster students’ comprehension of text before, during, and after reading, using research-based techniques that are beneficial to struggling readers, English learners, and students with disabilities. Before reading, Anchor Videos, teacher-led lessons, and vocabulary development lessons in the Student App help students activate prior knowledge and build mental models of new concepts. During reading, the Student App helps students comprehend the text by providing definitions for unfamiliar words, identifying signal and vocabulary words in the text, and personalizing coaching and feedback to keep the students on task and encourage them to use helpful supports. Finally, READ 180 Universal instruction includes activities and routines to assess and reinforce comprehension after reading.

Text Complexity

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require that all students read grade-level, complex texts, but many readers are not able to do so independently. Thoughtful and informed instruction and scaffolding can help students tackle complex text. Teaching students how to pay close attention to the text, reread, annotate the text with notes in the margin, identify the author’s purpose and text structure, circle confusing words or sections, talk about the text with others, and ask text-dependent questions can be beneficial in helping students comprehend complex text (Liben & Liben, 2013).

There are many factors that contribute to the complexity of a text. In addition to word difficulty, sentence length, and sentence structure, the genre and structure of the text can also affect the readability of a passage. Texts in familiar genres and that are well structured with signal words are easier to read than unfamiliar, less-structured texts (Williams et al., 2014). Another factor that contributes to text complexity is cohesion, or the characteristics of the text that help the reader connect ideas in the text. Texts have several layers of cohesion: within sentences, within paragraphs, and across the texts (Graesser, McNamara, & Kulikowich, 2011). It is important to consider all of these factors when assessing the complexity and readability of a text.

Reading is fundamental for meeting life goals, such as becoming informed, accomplishing tasks, pursuing interests, and raising children. Unless students learn how to read texts of real-world complexity, they will be unprepared for college, careers, and life in general. When students read complex texts, they gain new language and knowledge that they need in order to access ever more advanced texts (Adams, 2009; 2011). Immersion in complex texts is one of the best ways to help students develop mature language skills and the conceptual knowledge they need for success in school and beyond (Bridges, 2014).

Studies indicate that exposure to a wide range of texts strengthens understanding of the relationships among different words and concepts—building a “word consciousness” that enables the reader to more easily interpret the meanings of previously unencountered words (Adams, 2009).

For students to acquire the language of literacy, or academic language, they must encounter these structures and patterns in the materials they read. Providing students with exposure to complex texts allows them access to academic language, and having them interact with the texts allows them to discover how academic language works (Fillmore & Fillmore, 2012).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal guides students from highly supported reading toward independent mastery of increasingly complex text, enabling students of all reading levels to access content-rich complex texts. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt® (HMH®) has created a version of the Common Core State Standards’ (CCSS) text complexity triangle. The Text Complexity Triangle measures the three components of text complexity as outlined by CCSS: Quantitative (Lexile measure), Qualitative, and Reader & Task.

ReaL Book Workshops include two types of texts: Fluency Texts and Workshop Texts. The first text in a Workshop is always a fluency text that introduces the Workshop topic, and serves to build knowledge about the topic. Workshop texts that follow are more complex and represent a variety of text types and lengths. The texts within a ReaL Book Workshop are sequenced to build on each other in order of increasing difficulty. The background knowledge and vocabulary that students develop from initial selections allow them to move from simple to more complex text. The Teacher’s Edition Lesson Overview includes a Heads Up section with challenges that students may experience with each text. Multiple reads, explicit vocabulary learning, teacher-led close reading, and ReaL Book scaffolds support students as they work toward reading increasingly complex and grade-level texts.

The Qualitative components of text complexity considered by READ 180 Universal include those identified by Coh-Metrix as the most important factors in readability: narrativity, syntactic simplicity, word concreteness, referential cohesion, and deep cohesion (Graesser, McNamara, & Kulikowich, 2011). As students progress through the Student Application (Student App), the texts that they encounter become relatively more complex in each of these dimensions. The relative complexity of each of these dimensions is offset by the other dimensions, providing scaffolds for the students to read and comprehend increasingly complex texts.

READ 180 Universal provides teachers with the tools to expertly match reader to text and task. The variety and volume of texts in READ 180 Universal provide varying degrees of complexity and scaffolding, allowing students to access texts at the appropriate level of challenge and move toward independence. The adaptive technology in READ 180 Universal customizes instruction and practice according to students’ Lexile measures and other quantitative and qualitative factors that make up the student’s learner profile, providing continual opportunities for all students, including English learners and students with disabilities, to experience success and demonstrate progress. Throughout READ 180 Universal, each reading is marked with an icon displaying its Lexile measure and complexity level to assist teachers in effectively matching readers with appropriately leveled texts.

Using the above dimensions, each Workshop entails a series of increasingly complex texts—a diverse array of classic and contemporary literature as well as challenging informational texts in a range of subjects. Each Workshop supports students in accessing complex texts through a narrow reading approach in which students read a series of increasingly challenging texts with overlapping topics and recurring academic vocabulary. Each new text builds on the previous media and texts, providing students with the background knowledge, vocabulary, and confidence needed to access complex texts that might otherwise have been too challenging.

Independent Reading and Read Alouds

Explicit and systematic cognitive research that has been conducted over many decades has revealed that reading not only builds our brains; it also exercises our intelligence (Bridges, 2014). Reading is a rich, complex, and cognitive act that provides us with a great opportunity to exercise our intelligence in ways that we lose if we do not read (Cunningham & Rose, 2013).

Decades of research have shown us that avid readers are also skillful readers and writers. They have more knowledge about the conventions of language in areas such as spelling, punctuation, grammar, and vocabulary. They also know more about the world (Bridges, 2014).

Students will not become successful independent readers unless they are given the chance to practice reading independently. By giving students the opportunity to choose texts in which they are interested, they will be able to read more complex texts because they are motivated and often knowledgeable about the topic (Liben & Liben, 2013).

Half of children ages 6–17 who read independently in a class or school (52%) say it’s one of their favorite parts of the day and wish it would happen more often. Almost all children in this age range (91%) say that their favorite books are ones that they choose themselves. One-third of children aged 6–17 (33%) say their class has a designated time during the school day to read a book of their choice independently, but only 17% do this every or almost every school day (Scholastic, 2015).

Findings from the Kids & Family Reading Report (2015) showed that 54% of children ages 0–5 are read aloud to at home five to seven days a week, and 40% of children ages 6–11 who are no longer read aloud to at home wish that they were. Among a wide range of age groups, 83% of kids say that they liked a lot the times that their parents read to them aloud at home, and they wish their parents had continued to read to them after they reached school age.

It is important that parents and teachers read to their children and students every day. Reading aloud together is one of the best ways for children to learn to read. The most important thing is to let children set their own pace and have fun during the experience (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2015).

Although 61% of children have read an ebook, a nearly equal number—65%—agree that they’ll always want to read books in print (Scholastic, 2015), making it important to offer texts in both mediums to engage all learners.

Research on students’ use of digital and print text suggests that middle-grade students could benefit from direct instruction for comprehending digital text along with practice interacting with digital texts. In particular, students need to develop better strategies for making sense of digital text instead of over-applying the strategies they use with print text (Davis & Neitzel, 2012).

Respected literacy researchers Gina Biancarosa and Gina S. Griffiths (2014) offer several recommendations for teachers to integrate technology and digital texts into their existing classroom routines. In particular, they argue that technology should be viewed as one tool many teachers use to prepare students for literacy in a digital age. When incorporating digital tools into a classroom, their recommendations include selecting evidence-based technology, providing ongoing support to teachers using the technology, and making good use of the data provided by the technology.

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal ensures that students make reading part of their daily routine by dedicating one of the three Station Rotations to independent reading. Texts in the Independent Reading rotation provide engaging content that is delivered at the appropriate level of the student. Students also have the option of choosing more challenging texts that are aligned with their interests.

Independent reading is designed to foster student choice and a love of reading, but also includes checkpoints for accountability and teacher insight on student progress. The READ 180 Universal Independent Reading library consists of print books and digital reads, including eBooks and eReads, as well as audiobooks that model fluency and reading comprehension strategies. Students are provided scaffolds for eReads, which are relevant, current, and engaging articles of differing modalities and lengths.

READ 180 Universal offers Independent Reading supports for students and teachers. In the digital Independent Reading experience, students can access additional supports, such as text-to-speech as well as a dictionary. The resources available to teachers include:

  • Summaries of each book
  • Questions that can be used for one-on-one conferences with aides, students, and parents
  • Ideas for final projects, such as book reviews and letters to authors

After finishing an Independent Reading book, students can take HMH Reading Counts! quizzes. When students log on to HMH Reading Counts!, they see the books they have completed and can then choose to take either an HMH Reading Counts! quiz or a challenge quiz—as the name implies, the latter quiz is a more challenging one. The choices that students make will give the teacher insight into their mindsets, motivation, and challenge-seeking behaviors. The teacher will know how many books students have read and how they have challenged themselves. Students will also complete reading logs to track their progress toward the goals they set at the beginning of the year. Students can log their progress in ReaL Book or during the Student Application (Student App) or Independent Reading rotation.

Writing for Understanding

The ability to write effectively is critical to reading development. Writing instruction can have a positive impact on students’ reading skills and comprehension, particularly when students analyze and interpret texts in writing, write summaries, and answer questions about texts in writing (Graham & Hebert, 2010).

Reading and writing go hand in hand. By identifying and explicitly discussing the features of different texts, teachers can support students’ comprehension and offer models for writing (Schleppegrell, 2009).

Teachers can use writing instruction as a tool to promote knowledge and as a mechanism for higher-order thinking (Graham & Hebert, 2010). To be well-prepared for college, the workplace, and life, students need opportunities to develop critical thinking skills, discussing and critiquing different viewpoints in order to form and justify their own stance (Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy, 2010; Lewis & Moorman, 2007).

Instructional programs that incorporate units of study stress the reading-writing connection as students engage in higher-order thinking skills, such as reading and writing about a wide range of text types, comparing and contrasting the structures of complex texts, and analyzing how an author’s writing decisions contribute to the text’s structure and meaning (Pytash & Morgan, 2013; National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010).

Meta-analyses of writing instruction, including studies of struggling writers, have found several strategies to have moderate to strong evidence for improving student writing including: (a) teaching students strategies for planning, drafting, sharing, evaluating, revising, and editing; (b) teaching students procedures for regulating the writing strategies they are taught; (c) teaching students spelling, handwriting, and keyboarding; (d) setting clear and specific writing goals; and (e) giving students opportunities to work together to plan, draft, revise, and edit their papers (Graham, McKeown et al., 2012; Graham & Perin, 2007a, 2007b).

English learners need significant, structured opportunities to engage in academic discourse through speaking and writing (Francis et al., 2006; Kinsella & Feldman, 2005). For English learners, structured approaches to teaching writing have been found to be more effective than approaches without structure or scaffolds (Shanahan & Beck, 2006).

All students, especially English learners, will benefit from writing instruction that teaches them how English works. This instruction will help students gain an understanding of text structure and cohesion; use nouns, verbs, and adjectives effectively to expand and enrich ideas; and connect and condense ideas within sentences (California Department of Education, 2012).

Writers must know about what they write in order to communicate important information. Central to effective writing is the means to express language and thought in a way that allows readers to understand what the writer is saying. Before beginning to write, students should understand both the complex ideas that they would like to convey as well as the necessary grammatical structures needed to convey them effectively (Vermont Writing Collaborative, 2015).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal embraces the reciprocal relationship between reading and writing and provides the rigorous writing instruction that is necessary for students to become proficient readers and writers. Based on the research of Dr. Steve Graham and Dr. Karen Harris, students learn a process to successfully plan, organize, and write (POW) responses to text. Students have multiple opportunities to write narrative, informative, and argument pieces, and they learn, practice, and apply strategies specific to each of these genres.

In addition to a strategy that will guide them through the writing process, students will learn genre-specific strategies to use as they plan and write narrative, informative, and argument pieces.

In narrative writing, students learn, practice, and apply the WWW+2 strategy; in informative writing, students learn, practice, and apply the TIDE strategy; and in argument writing, students learn, practice, and apply the TREE strategy.

Throughout Whole- and Small-Group Learning, READ 180 Universal writing instruction emphasizes writing with a purpose and writing that develops content knowledge and reading skills. These purposeful writing activities, and the associated discussions, help students to log the “miles on the tongue” that Dr. Kate Kinsella has found is vitally important to language development for English learners. READ 180 Universal writing instruction provides carefully guided opportunities for students to engage in many different types of writing, from simple sentences to multi-paragraph essays.

In paragraph-length constructed response writings and multi-paragraph essays, students follow the steps of the writing process: planning writing, organizing ideas using graphic organizers, composing a draft, and revising for clarity, conventions, and purpose. Writing is then shared through peer feedback and a variety of publishing opportunities. This systematically scaffolded writing process helps students explore and extend their knowledge through writing and guides them in clearly conveying ideas using academic language.

Throughout READ 180 Universal, grammar, usage, and mechanics are taught systematically and in context in accordance with the research of Dr. Kate Kinsella. Analyzing and evaluating a model paper before writing helps make expectations transparent and aids struggling writers in visualizing the demands of the assignment. After writing, students use the routines they are taught during Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning to read, score, and respond to a partner’s writing. These multiple opportunities for feedback provide the support that students—including English learners and students with disabilities—need to gain confidence and independence with English grammar and writing for academic purposes.

In the Student Application (Student App), the Writing Zone engages students in writing activities at appropriate levels of complexity with the supports and scaffolds they need in order to be successful writers. Students practice the WWW+2, TIDE, and TREE strategies and receive the scaffolds, including sentence frames, sentence starters, and graphic organizers, that are most appropriate to their writing levels. They receive immediate personalized feedback in addition to the more detailed feedback provided by peers and their teachers.

Teaching as Emotional Work
Mindset and Self-Efficacy

Students’ academic mindsets play an important role in making them more engaged in learning, more resilient in the face of setbacks, and more academically successful. A report by the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (CCCR) defined four important beliefs that make up academic mindset: a sense of belonging, self-efficacy, relevance/purpose, and growth mindset (Farrington et al., 2012).

Growth mindset is the belief that through effort and perseverance, one can become better at something. Engagement, motivation, choice, ownership, and a growth mindset are intimately related (Dweck, 2007; Glei, 2013).

There have been numerous additions to the growth mindset literature in recent years (Blackwell et al., 2007; Cohen, Garcia, Purdie-Vaughns, Apfel, & Brzustoski, 2009; Yeager, Walton, Ritter, & Dweck, 2013). The Blackwell et al. (2007) study found that after eight growth mindset sessions in which students learned that intelligence can change over time, the students outperformed a control group on grade point averages. Additionally, a study by Greenleaf et al. (2011) found similar results for interventions focusing on academic behaviors.

Skills such as perseverance, curiosity, conscientiousness, optimism, and self-control instill growth mindset and grit in students, allowing them to continue to try. These skills have more to do with character than with cognition and should be taught alongside daily curricular instruction (Tough, 2012).

Self-efficacy in the academic realm is the belief and confidence that one has in regard to his or her capacity to accomplish meaningful learning tasks and produce the desired results (Brozo & Flynn, 2008).

Perseverance refers to the tendency to pursue long-term goals with sustained effort and hard work. It has been shown to predict achievement in academic and vocational domains (Duckworth, Quinn, & Seligman, 2009; Duckworth & Quinn, 2009).

Executive function describes students’ ability to control their cognitive processes, including planning, organizing, reasoning, and working memory. Students with strong executive function abilities are able to control the many different processes that lead to successful reading comprehension. Measures of executive function are highly correlated to measures of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and reading achievement (Miller et al., 2014).

Students who have an easier time learning to read tend to use metacognitive awareness as they are reading to think about what they are doing and to adjust the strategies they use accordingly. Some metacognitive strategies that foster reading growth include: setting goals while reading; regulating progress; and employing mastery-oriented strategies in order to reach comprehension goals (Molden & Dweck, 2006; Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995). These strategies assist struggling students in realizing that their reading abilities are fluid—not fixed. They encourage students to persist in the face of difficulty and avoid becoming convinced that they are “bad” readers.

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal develops academic mindset and behaviors as well as executive function, and encourages learning strategies critical for success in college and career. Building on existing structures that instill a sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and purpose, READ 180 Universal adds a focus on growth mindset. This focus helps to build students’ knowledge of growth mindset and increase their awareness of their own mindsets. READ 180 Universal also helps teachers internalize and operationalize growth mindset for themselves and their students. Additionally, the program supports students and teachers in making connections between their academic mindsets, behaviors and performance over time.

Growth mindset is integrated into READ 180 Universal using five principles, which reach across program components (Whole- and Small-Group Learning, Student App, and Independent Reading):

  • Teach how the brain changes learning and how focus and effort can lead to academic success.
  • Build a growth mindset classroom culture where students and teachers have the language to talk about academic mindsets and behaviors.
  • Communicate feedback that focuses on process, not abilities.
  • Model and teach positive learning behaviors.
  • Illuminate connections between mindset, behavior, and performance.

During the first two weeks of READ 180 Universal, teachers and students begin to build their academic community with the Getting Started Workshop. In these lessons, students investigate what it means to have a growth mindset and experience how the brain changes with learning in an Anchor Video. This Workshop helps students understand their own mindsets and how they can “build their brains” with positive learning behaviors. The concept of a fixed mindset versus a growth mindset is introduced from the very beginning of the year, so students and teachers have language to discuss mindset and behavior. They can work together to overcome challenges with effort and perseverance.

Throughout the course of READ 180 Universal, students cultivate a growth mindset by approaching learning tasks with perseverance. The gradual release approach used in all READ 180 Universal instruction ensures that students gain confidence as they move from full support to independent work, taking on increased responsibility for their own learning.

The READ 180 Universal Student App also reflects important principles of engagement and motivation—critical for struggling readers. Students can track their progress toward  and mastery of reading skills through HMH Student Central. Monitoring their progress will build students’ self-efficacy as they witness their growth and progress through READ 180 Universal. By empowering students to drive their own learning, students will develop executive function skills that will serve them in the classroom and beyond.

The Student App provides patient encouragement to students, along with immediate individualized feedback that can be particularly beneficial to English learners and students with disabilities. This access to information about their progress and achievements not only motivates students, but also builds their awareness of who they are as learners, and guides them in setting and working toward academic goals.

Social and Emotional Learning

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the process by which students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to understand and manage emotions, set and achieve goals, feel and show empathy for others, maintain positive relationships, and make responsible decisions (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, 2013).

Five of the SEL core competencies are self-awareness (the ability to accurately recognize one’s emotions and thoughts and their influence on behavior); self-regulation (managing one’s emotions, thoughts, and behaviors effectively in different situations); social awareness (taking the perspective of and empathizing with others from diverse backgrounds and cultures while recognizing social and ethical norms for behavior); relationship skills (establishing and maintaining healthy and rewarding relationships with diverse individuals and groups); and responsible decision making (making constructive and respectful choices about personal behavior and social interactions based on ethical standards and the well-being of self and others) (CASEL, 2013).

Some of the SEL factors that improve success in school include having self-discipline, motivating one’s self, managing stress, and organizing one’s approach to learning more (Duckworth & Seligman, 2005).

Self-regulation is another component of SEL that has been linked to academic achievement. Students who display this aspect of SEL try harder and have more persistence in the face of challenges (Aronson et al., 2002).

Three decades of research covered in a meta-analysis of 213 SEL programs found that SEL interventions increased students’ academic performance by 11 percentile points over students who did not participate in SEL programs. The SEL programs also reduced aggression and emotional distress, increased helping behaviors, and improved positive attitudes toward one’s self and others (Durlak et al., 2011).

Social and emotional learning in schools can be just as, if not even more, essential than academic learning for putting students on a path to positive developmental and life outcomes. A study conducted by the Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education at Columbia University’s Teachers College found that schools that invest in social-emotional learning programs experience a return on their investment of $11 for every dollar spent. In addition to improvements in grades, attendance, and performance in core subjects, other benefits from social-emotional learning programs include reductions in aggression, substance abuse, delinquency, depression, and anxiety (Belfield et al., 2015).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

The content organized within READ 180 Universal’s Knowledge Map reinforces and provides examples of the importance of managing emotions, setting and working to achieve goals, showing empathy for others, maintaining positive relationships, and making responsible decisions.

Within the Student Application (Student App) and Independent Reading, students read texts that inspire them to consider others through new perspectives. The messages and feedback delivered in the Student App encourage students to persevere and achieve goals, make responsible decisions, regulate their thoughts and behaviors, manage stress, and organize their approach to learning.

HMH Student Central™ within the Student App allows students to set goals, regulate their progress, and motivate themselves toward achieving their goals.

The Independent Reading Library includes a number of titles that promote healthy social and emotional traits. The books help students build social awareness by encouraging them to feel and show empathy for others from diverse backgrounds and cultures. They also demonstrate positive relationship skills, such as seeking out healthy and rewarding relationships with diverse individuals and responsible decision making such as making constructive and respectful choices about actions and behavior.

During the Getting Started Workshop, completed during the first two weeks of the school year, students set goals for each of the READ 180 Universal rotations and learn tips to help them achieve those goals. These goals are revisited throughout the school year to help the students become self-motivated and self-regulated in achieving their goals. Students gain social awareness through reading stories and watching videos about other people who have faced and overcome challenges. The activities that students complete during this Workshop help them to become aware of their own thoughts and emotions and how they can control them to “do a 180,” rewrite their own stories, and put themselves on a path to college and career success.

Family Engagement

In order for a child to be successful in school, there are numerous critical roles that families play: supporters of learning, encouragers of perseverance and determination, models of educational practices, and advocates of appropriate school environments for their children. Families need the opportunity to learn and grow along with their children and to support the learning and growth of their children in order for partnerships between families and schools to succeed (Mapp & Kuttner, 2014).

Schools and districts that successfully engage families in their children’s learning are able to strike a balance between pushing families to support learning and pulling the families into the school community. These schools view families as partners in their children’s education and provide a collaborative environment that builds relationships between educators and families. They have frameworks that encourage both learning at home and collaborative decision making (Henderson, Mapp, Johnson, & Davies, 2007).

Having books in the home helps establish a reading culture that continues from generation to generation within families and is independent of education and class. This creates an interest in and desire for books that will promote the skills and knowledge needed to foster both literacy and numeracy, thus leading to lifelong academic advantages (Evans et al., 2010). Children whose parents have lots of books are nearly 20% more likely to finish college. Books in the home are a stronger predictor of college graduation than the educational levels of the parents (Evans et al., 2010).

It is very important that families and educators make a firm commitment to encourage adolescent students to read outside of school by finding ways to engage them with texts over the summer, as well as before and after school. Moreover, it is critical that we encourage them to make reading a part of their lifestyle (Williams, 2014).

For a child to become a reader, time spent with parents or caregivers who engage with their children with books—whether through close readings or discussion of pictures—is what is most necessary. When children not only have access to books but can also share them with reading mentors who love books and reading, they are much more likely to thrive as readers (Heath, 1983; Bridges, 2014).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal provides resources to help families support students’ learning and connect with the READ 180 Universal classroom. Families and caregivers can go online to the Family Portal—hmhco.com/read180/familyportal—to learn about READ 180 Universal instruction and materials. The site includes videos that provide tips for families about how to support their children’s literacy achievement, and offers links to additional resources and research to help caregivers understand the needs of struggling readers. In addition, the Family Portal provides a space for sharing success stories and experiences with teachers and other READ 180 Universal families.

Each ReaL Book Workshop includes four or five strategies to support teachers in involving and engaging parents, including:

  • Strategies for soliciting and hearing the concerns, hopes, needs, and insights of parents
  • Suggestions for sharing expectations about parent involvement and asking parents about their expectations
  • Channels for asking parents what they view as important in helping students succeed and adding those things to classroom practice
  • Frequent communications with parents and families (via email, letters, and suggestions on school websites)
  • Invitations for parent volunteers
  • Information on supporting ReaL Book work at home while helping students build independence
  • Information on classroom assignments and the role of homework in reinforcing class discussion/learning

These strategies are available in the Teacher’s Edition throughout the texts and during process writing instruction. Parent reports of student progress as well as letters to parents are available in multiple languages. Access to digital books helps students engage with their families over texts.

Professional Learning Communities

With an emphasis on teachers as critical players in enhancing student achievement, developing strong professional learning communities plays a big role in improving educational outcomes. Professional learning communities add to teacher quality in the following ways (National Council of Teachers of English, 2010):

  • Linking research and practice
  • Creating space for addressing problems of practice
  • Increasing teacher retention
  • Uniting pedagogical and disciplinary knowledge
  • Fostering transformative teaching
  • Enhancing student learning

Educational research has a more direct effect on teacher practices when teachers can see its relevance to their daily practice in the classroom. Professional learning communities allow members to actively seek and carry out research that addresses group concerns and to reflect on the research as a community (Vanderlinde & van Braak, 2010).

Focusing on a community of teachers’ inquiry into questions about instruction and students’ learning deepens teachers’ understanding of student learning and allows the collective capacity of the community to address instructional dilemmas (Webb, Vulliamy, Anneli, Hamalainen, & Polkionen, 2009).

Professional learning communities encourage transformative learning as participants with varying backgrounds, expertise, and experience are able to offer multiple perspectives on classroom practice. All participants are contributors in working toward more creative and effective methods of teaching every unique student (Barab, Barnett, & Squire, 2002).

By participating in learning communities, educators are more likely to understand and demonstrate the kind of lifelong learning that they desire for their students. The awareness about learning that comes from participating in a learning community creates connections between assessment and instruction for both teachers and learners (Birenbaum, Kimron, Shilton, & Shahaf-Barzilay, 2009).

How READ 180 Universal Delivers

READ 180 Universal provides resources to help teachers support students’ learning and connect with the READ 180 Universal classroom on a personalized and national level. The online Educator Community gives READ 180 teachers the opportunity to find helpful resources, connect with other READ 180 professionals, and engage in professional learning. The site is located at hmhco.com/educatorcommunity. This is a one-stop shop for READ 180 teachers to download classroom resources, ask questions, read about relevant topics and best practices from our expert teacher bloggers, and watch professional learning videos on a range of topics.

Having this community space for educators and the Family Portal for families is extremely important for educational development, as teachers and parents are provided with a professional forum to discuss student progress, look for evidence of student thinking, identify common errors, and discuss how to better facilitate learning experiences.

Ever mindful of the critical role of parents in their children’s education, we consider parents to be powerful members of professional learning communities. Each ReaL Book Workshop includes several strategies to support teachers in involving and engaging parents. These strategies include soliciting feedback, sharing expectations, parent/caregiver volunteer opportunities, and ongoing communication. In addition, READ 180 Universal provides information for parents on supporting students’ ReaL Book work at home including helpful tips on the role of homework in reinforcing students’ learning.

Summary

READ 180 Universal offers students with disabilities and English learners an intensive literacy intervention program deeply grounded in research and best practices. Recognizing the power of blended learning solutions along with the ever-important role of the educator, READ 180 Universal is a program that prepares students to be reflective, independent, and effective readers and thinkers. Utilizing the latest neuroscientific findings related to literacy learning, educators are informed on how to differentiate learning, assess instructional effectiveness, and provide the supports that students with learning disabilities and English learners need to acquire and utilize knowledge to their upmost ability.

The development of this newest edition of READ 180 Universal is grounded in the renowned research of READ 180 authors and partners, and in an extensive understanding of the field of reading research. As the evidence base for what makes a successful blended learning instructional program has grown since READ 180’s beginning in 1999, we have continually sought to improve our program to reflect the most current knowledge available on accelerating the learning of all students, especially students with disabilities and English learners.

READ 180 Universal gives students with disabilities and English learners the foundational skills and scaffolding supports that they need to read complex texts. An increased focus on writing helps students plan, organize, and write across genres in the service of reading. READ 180 Universal gives greater attention to the importance of independent reading and read alouds to make sure students increase their background knowledge and stay engaged and motivated.

With new resources to ensure that all students have a growth mindset, READ 180 Universal encourages students with disabilities and English learners to persevere through challenges and obstacles. The Student Application (Student App) in READ 180 Universal has been designed to meet the needs of all students across the constructs of reading in order to give them instruction and practice in the areas that they need, while building on their strengths.

As demonstrated in this paper, the specific elements that were added to READ 180 Universal include an array of enhancements informing an educative curriculum for teachers as well as an increased focus on the neurological underpinnings of reading for all students, especially students with disabilities and English learners. The program components enable teachers to continuously improve their instruction, provide more opportunities for students to read independently and listen to read alouds, realize the important role of mindset and self-efficacy, as well as social-emotional learning, and enhance personalized instruction for all students.

READ 180 Universal makes it easier for teachers to do what they do best: change students’ lives through effective and meaningful instruction.

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Resolving the “great debate.” American Educator, 19(2), 10–20.

Adams, M. J. (2009). The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Guilford.

Adams, M. J. (2011). Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex texts. American Educator, Winter 2010–2011, 3–11.

Allan, S. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2010). Differentiated instruction and RTI: A natural fit. Educational Leadership, 68(2).

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2015). Helping your child learn to read. Retrieved from http://littoolkit.aap.org/Pages/home.aspx

Anderson, A., & Skrzypchak, A. (2011). Blended learning: The best of both worlds. Retrieved from http://www.dkfoundation.org/reports.asp

Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K–12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.

Association of American Educators. (2015). Reform matters. Retrieved from http://www.aaeteachers.org/index.php/blog/1456-reform-mattersmarch-12th-2015

Au, K. (1993). Literacy instruction in multicultural settings. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.

Avalos, M. A. (2006). No two learners are alike: Learners with linguistic and cultural differences. In J. S. Schumm (Ed.), Reading assessment and instruction for all learners (pp. 59–86). New York, NY: Guilford.

Bailey, J., Ellis, S., Schneider, C., & Vander Ark, K. (2013). Blended Learning Implementation Guide, Version 1.0. Digital Learning Now. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/CSD6190.pdf

Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489–542.

Baumann, J. F., Kame’enui, E. J., & Ash, G. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 752–785). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Belfield, C., Bowden, B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies in Education at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/s/Belfield-et-al-The-Economics-ofSEL-Feb-2015.pdf

Berninger, V., & Wolf, B. (2009). Teaching students with dyslexia and dysgraphia. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.

Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. S. (2014). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 139–160.

Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from https://lincs.ed.gov/professional-development/resource-collections/profile-392

Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., Shilton, H., & Shahaf-Barzilay, R. (2009). Cycles of inquiry: Formative assessment in service of learning in classrooms and in school-based professional communities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(4), 130–149.

Birsh, J. R. (Ed.). (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.

Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(5), 5–31.

Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded Edition). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Bridges, L. (2014). The joy and power of reading. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.

Brozo, W., & Flynn, E. S. (2008). Motivating students to read in the content classroom: Six evidence-based principles. The Reading Teacher, 62(2), 172–174.

Bruhn, A. L., Hirsch, S. E., Gorsh, J., & Hannan, C. (2014). Simple strategies for reflecting on and responding to common criticisms of PBIS. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 27(1), 13–25.

Bruhn, A. L., Lane, K. L., & Hirsch, S. E. (2013). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multitiered models of behavioral prevention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 171–189.

California Department of Education. (2010). World language content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/worldlanguage2009.pdf

California Department of Education. (2012). Overview of the California English language development standards and proficiency level descriptors. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/documents/sbeoverviewpld.pdf

Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2011). What is universal design for learning? Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/research/udl

Chatterji, M., Koh, N., Choi, L., & Iyengar, R. (2009). Closing learning gaps proximally with teacher-mediated diagnostic classroom assessment. Research in the Schools, 16(2), 59–75.

Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Johnson, C. (2011). Disrupting class (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324, 400–403.

Cohen, R., Kincaid, D., & Childs, K. E. (2007). Measuring school-wide positive behavior support implementation: Development and validation of the Benchmarks of Quality. Journal of Positive Behavior Support, 9, 203–213.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2013). The CASEL Guide. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/guide/

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA–Literacy

Cunningham, A., & Rose, D. (2013). This is your brain on reading. Education Week, 32(15), 20–21.

Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=11566

Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S. (2014). Using technology to support at-risk students’ learning. Retrieved from edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/scope-pub-using technology-report.pdf

Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C. (2012). Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments. Reading and Writing, 25, 831–856.

Doorey, N. A. (2012). The light ahead. Center for K–12 Assessment and Performance Management at ETS. Retrieved from http://www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/Coming_Together_April_2012_Final.PDF

Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.

Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540–547.

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. American Psychological Society, 16(12), 939–944.

Duffy, H. (2008). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school: A look at approaches to tiered intervention. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

Duke, N., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.

Dutro, S., & Kinsella, K. (2010). English language development: Issues and implementation at grades six through twelve. In Improving education for English learners: Research-based approaches (pp. 151–207). Sacramento, CA: CDE Press.

Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Balantine Books.

Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528.

Epstein, G., Cook, J., & Dihoff, R. E. (2005). Efficacy of error for the correction of initially incorrect assumptions and of feedback for the affirmation of correct responding: Learning in the classroom. The Psychological Record, 55(3), 401–418.

Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., Dikora, J., & Treiman, D. J. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 171–197.

Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Feldman, K. (2009). Response to intervention (RTI) and older struggling readers: Special education reform as part of meaningful school improvement. Presented at 2009 READ 180 National Summer Institute.

Feldman, K., & Kinsella, K. (2005). Narrowing the language gap: The case for explicit vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Scholastic.

Feldman, K., & Kinsella, K. (2008). Narrowing the language gap: The case for explicit vocabulary instruction in secondary classrooms. In L. Denti & G. Guerin (Eds.), Effective practices for adolescents with reading and literacy challenges (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Routledge.

Fillmore, L. W., & Fillmore, C. J. (2012). What does text complexity mean for English learners and language minority students? Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards, 94, 64.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3), 180–189.

Francis, D., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

Friedlaender, D., Burns, D., Lewis-Charp, H., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Zheng, X., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Student-centered schools: Closing the opportunity gap. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Progress monitoring in a multi-tiered prevention system. Perspectives, 3(2), 43–47.

Gendron, S. (2012). Next generation assessments: What to expect. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/NGAWhatToExpectWebinar.html

George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. (2009). Promoting excellence: Guiding principles for educating English language learners (2nd ed., pp. 44–45). Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.

Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 545–571.

Glei, J. (2013). Talent isn’t fixed and other mindsets that lead to greatness. Retrieved from: http://99u.com/articles/14379/talent-isnt-fixed-and-other-mindsets-that-lead-to-greatness

Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners. American Educator, 37(2), 4–11, 38.

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234.

Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescent middle and high school students.Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/writingnext.pdf

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007.). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education. Retrieved from https://www.carnegie.org/publications/writing-next-effective-strategies-to-improve-writing-of-adolescents-in-middle-and-high-schools/

Gredler, M. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 113–131.

Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C. K., Herman, J., & Schneider, S. A. (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 647–717.

Hall, T. E., Hughes, C. A., & Filbert, M. (2000). Computer assisted instruction in reading for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Education and Treatment of Children, 23(2), 173–193.

Hartry, A., Fitzgerald, R. A., & Porter, K. (2008). Implementing a structured reading program in an afterschool setting: Problems and potential solutions. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 181–210.

Hasselbring, T. (2005). Enhancing comprehension through the development of accurate mental models. Paper presented at the 49th Annual International Reading Association Convention, Reno, NV.

Hasselbring, T. S. (2010). Reading proficiency, the struggling reader, and the role of technology. In Baker, S. (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 23–40). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Hasselbring, T. S. (2012). Five reasons readers need technology. Reading: The Core Skill, 6(69).

Hasselbring, T. S., & Bausch, M. E. (2005). Assistive technologies for reading. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 72–75.

Hasselbring, T. S., & Glaser, C. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102–122.

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. London, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family/school partnerships. New York, NY: New Press.

Heo, Y. (2007). The impact of multimedia anchored instruction on the motivation to learn of students with and without learning disabilities placed in inclusive middle school language arts classes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 6812A, 5031. Retrieved from https://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2007/heoy96433/heoy96433.pdf

Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008. Public Law 110-315, 20 U.S.C.A. & 1001. (n.d.).

Hirsch, E. D. (2014). Sustaining the American experiment. In C. E. Finn & M. J. Petrilli, (Eds.), Knowledge at the core: Don Hirsch, Core Knowledge, and the future of the Common Core (pp. 31–47). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Institute.

Hirsch, E. D., & Pondiscio, R. (2010). There’s no such thing as a reading test. The American Prospect, 21(6), A13–A15.

Horn, M.B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

International Dyslexia Association. (2007). Dyslexia basics. International Dyslexia Association Website. Retrieved from http://www.interdys.org/FactSheetsDyslexiaBasicsPrototype.htm

International Dyslexia Association. (2012). Just the facts. Information provided by the International Dyslexia Association. Baltimore, MD.

Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/AdolescentsAndLiteracy.pdf

Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Kansas Technical Assistance System Network (TASN). (2008). Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS). Retrieved from http://www.kansasmtss.org

Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778.

Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a mixed-method literacy intervention improve the reading achievement of low-performing elementary school students in an after-school program? Results from a randomized controlled trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201.

Kinsella, K. (2013). Cutting to the Common Core: Making vocabulary number one. Language Magazine, 12(12), 18–23.

Kinsella, K., & Feldman, K. (2005). Structures for active participation and learning. New York, NY: Scholastic RED.

Lacina, J. (2004). Promoting language acquisitions: Technology and English language learners. Childhood Education, 81(2), 113–115.

Lang, L., Torgesen, J. K., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 149–175.

Lane, K. L., Robertson, E. J., & Graham-Bailey, M. A. L. (2006). An examination of schoolwide interventions with primary level efforts conducted in secondary schools: Methodological considerations. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Applications of research methodology: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 19, pp. 157–199). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.

Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Lewis, J. (2007). Academic literacy: Principles and learning opportunities for adolescent readers. In J. Lewis & G. Moorman (Eds.), Adolescent literacy instruction: Policies and promising practices (pp. 143–166). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2013). ‘Both and’ literacy instruction: A proposed paradigm shift for the Common Core ELA classroom. Student Achievement Partners. Retrieved from http://achievethecore.org/content/upload/Both%20And%20Literacy%20Instruction%20K-5%20%20A%20Proposed%20Paradigm%20Shift%20for%20CCSS%20ELA%20and%20Literacy.pdf

Lipka, O., Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of a group of grade 4 disabled readers: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 364–378.

Mapp, K. L., & Kuttner, P. J. (2014). Partners in education: A dual capacity-building framework for family-school partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/framework/

Marzano, R. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

McCleary, D. F., Rowlette, E. F., Pelchar, T. K., & Bain, S. K. (2013). Interventions for learning disabilities: Does a journal-based change in focus and article type reflect or influence legal mandates? Review of Educational Research, online first version of record. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/07/0034654313476143

McIntyre, C. W., & Pickering, J. S. (1995). Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education for students with dyslexia and related disorders. Salem, OR: The International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.

Medina, J. J. (2014). Brain rules for baby. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.

Meltzer, L. (2007). Preface. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

Miller, A. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Kearns, D., Zhang, W., . . . Kirchner, D. P. (2014). Behavioral attention: a longitudinal study of whether and how it influences the development of word reading and reading comprehension among at-risk readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 232–249.

Moats, L. (2012). Reconciling the Common Core State Standards with reading research. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 38(4), 15–18.

Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192–203.

Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., & Shapiro, M. B. (2012). Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 99–127.

National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

National Council of Teachers of English. (2010). Teacher learning communities. The Council Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CC/0202-nov2010/CC0202Policy.pdf

National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy, National Center for Family Literacy.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2008). Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/about/partners/njcld

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

National Research Council (NRC). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. C. E. Snow, M. S. Burns, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Summit for Technology-Enabled Personalized Learning. (2014). Findings & Recommendations to Accelerate Implementation. Retrieved from http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TEPLS_report-FINAL-051415.pdf

Office of Special Education Programs. (2008). 30th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2008/parts-b-c/30th-idea-arc.pdf

Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pytash, K. E., & Morgan, D. N. (2013). A unit of study approach for teaching Common Core State Standards for writing: A unit of study can provide a framework that fosters students’ engagement with writing tasks. Middle School Journal, 44(3), 44–51.

RAND Corporation. (2014). How to create adaptive innovation and technology policy. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/innovation_policy/evaluating-science-policy.html

Rose, D. H. (2014, October). Stories for Scholastic. Presentation delivered in October 2014.

Rose, D. H., Hasselbring, T. S., Stahl, S., & Zabala, J. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 508–517). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.

Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., Strangman, N., & Rappolt, G. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Salinger, T., Moorthy, S., Toplitz, M., Jones, W., & Rosenthal, E. (2010). Implementation matters: Systems for success. A descriptive study of READ 180 in urban middle schools. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

Scarborough, H. S. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32(2), 182–211.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2009). Language in academic subject areas and classroom instruction: What is academic language and how can we teach it? Invited paper for a workshop on the Role of Language in School Learning sponsored by The National Academy of Sciences, Menlo Park, CA.

Scholastic Inc. (2015). Kids and family reading report. Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/readingreport/

Shanahan, T. (2008). Implications of RTI for the reading teacher. In International Reading Association (Ed.), Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators (pp. 105–122).

Shanahan, T., & Beck, I. (2006). Effective literacy teaching for English language learners. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth (pp. 415–488). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York, NY: Random House.

Shaywitz, S. E., Morris, R., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451–475.

Shepherd, M. J., & Marzola, E. S. (2011). Assessment. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed., pp. 427–458). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.

Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., and Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2008). Digest of education statistics 2007 (NCES 2008–022). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Staker, H., Chan, E., Clayton, M., Hernandez, A., Horn, M. B., & Mackey, K. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. [Innosight Institute report]. Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wpcontent/uploads/2011/01/TheRise-ofK-12-Blended-Learning.pdf

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K–12 blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

Stecker, P., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819.

Stewart, R. M., Benner, G. J., Martella, R. C., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 239–253.

Strangman, N., Hall, T., & Meyer, A. (2003). Text transformations. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=4864

Strickland, D. (2011). Teaching phonics today: Word study strategies through the grades (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: Schoolwide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50.

Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., . . . Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.

Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Functional- assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253–57.

Taylor, R., Hasselbring, T. S., & Williams, R. D. (2001). Reading, writing, and misbehavior. Principal Leadership, 2(2), 33–38.

The Iris Center, Vanderbilt Peabody College. (2015). Provide Corrective Feedback. Retrieved from http://iris.peabody.vanderbiltedu/module/udl/cresource/92/pudl_06_lik_o.com

Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Lessons learned from intervention research in reading: A way to go before we rest. In R. Stainthorpe (Ed.), Learning and teaching reading (pp. 89–103). London, United Kingdom: British Psychological Society.

Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L. M., Decker, S. M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., . . . Lesaux, N. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs, 30th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2008, Washington. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/index.html

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2014). Educator’s practice guide: Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Doc...

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2015 Mathematics Assessment.

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences and Abt Associates Inc. (2015). Summary of research generated by striving readers on the effectiveness of interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Retrieved from ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20164001

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). A new ICT curriculum for primary education in Flanders: Defining and predicting teachers’ perceptions of innovation attributes. Educational Technology and Society, 14(2), 124–135.

Vaughn, S., & Denton, C. A. (2008). Tier 2: The role of intervention. In D. Fuchs, L. Fuchs, & S. Vaughn, (Eds.), Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators (pp. 51–69). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Vaughn, S., & Roberts, G. (2007). Secondary interventions in reading: Providing additional instruction for students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 40–46.

Vermont Writing Collaborative. (2015). What is writing for understanding? Retrieved from http://www.vermontwritingcollaborative.org/Whatis.html

Wagner, R. K. (2008). Rediscovering dyslexia: New approaches for identification and classification. In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 174–191). New York, NY: Sage Publications Ltd.

Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N. K., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after Grade 3. [Review of educational research, online first version of record]. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/02/11/0034654313477212

Wattenberg, R. (2014). Complex texts require content knowledge: Will the new English standards get the content curriculum they need? In C. E. Finn & M. J. Petrilli (Eds.), Knowledge at the core: Don Hirsch, Core Knowledge, and the future of the Common Core (pp. 31–47). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Institute.

Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Anneli, S., Hamalainen, S., & Poikionen, P. (2009). Professional learning communities and teacher well being? A comparative analysis of primary schools in England and Finland. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 405–422.

Wehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PLOS One, 9(11).

What Works Clearinghouse. (2009). Intervention READ 180. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Williams, J. A. (2001). Classroom conversations: Opportunities to learn for ESL students in mainstream classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 720–757.

Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Snyder, A. E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J. G., & Atkins, J. G. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17.

Williams, M. (2014, May 12). Major drop in teens and reading, report says. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/parenting/wp/2014/05/12/when-it-comes-to-older-kids-and-reading-new-report-shows-the-situation-is-bleak/?utm_term=.dba0f0e26095

Williams, T., Hakuta, K., & Haertel, E. (2007). Similar English learner students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A follow-up analysis, based on a large-scale survey of California elementary schools serving a high proportion of low income and EL students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource.

Wolf, M. (2013). How the reading brain resolves the reading wars. Retrieved from http://literatenation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/102513-ReadBrainWP-eb.pdf

Yeager, D. S., Walton, G., Ritter, G., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Full-scale implementation of psychological interventions at a large institution: An experimental test. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Texas at Austin, Austin: TX.

Yeager, D. S., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). How can we instill productive mindsets at scale? A review of the evidence and an initial R&D agenda. White paper prepared for the White House meeting on excellence in education: The importance of academic mindsets, Washington, DC.

Zwiers, J. (2014). Developing academic oral communication skills. Retrieved from http://www.jeffzwiers.org/oral-communication.html

Zydney, J. M., Bathke, A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2014). Finding the optimal guidance for enhancing anchored instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 668–683.

Bronze level studies use a variety of designs, such as single-subject designs, pre- and posttests, qualitative case studies, ethnography, and self-report surveys, among other design types. While informative, these studies are not eligible to meet What Works Clearinghouse standards. Following the Every Student Succeeds Act categories, these studies provide promising evidence.

Gold level studies use the highest level of rigorous design. Specifically, gold level studies use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to randomly assign students to treatment and control groups. These studies are eligible to receive the highest rating for Meeting Evidence Standards from the What Works Clearinghouse. Following the Every Student Succeeds Act categories, these studies provide strong evidence.

WWW+2 refers to Who, When, Where, What, How

TIDE refers to Thesis Statement, Idea, Details, Ending.

TREE refers to Topic Sentence, Research, Evidence, Ending.