Now more than ever, we have the tools to improve the lives of students through reading instruction. We have years of research demonstrating effective practices for teaching reading comprehension and the experience to transform that research into instruction. The era of more rigorous standards has brought the relationship between research and instructional practice into sharp focus. Educators are able to monitor the progress of their students through technology, assessments, and their own observations and adjust their instruction accordingly.
Highly effective blended learning solutions, such as READ 180, are having significantly positive impacts on the achievement of struggling readers. There has been much progress in enhancing the technology base for the newest edition, READ 180 Universal, such as refining the adaptivity of the learner profile and employing speech recognition. Even more importantly, there has been a realization of the critical need for supporting educators in using the new technology as effectively as possible.
Most important, however, is the ability of technology to let teachers engage and motivate students to be lifelong learners. I have been fortunate to partner with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt® (HMH®) in continuously improving READ 180 after conducting the formative research and developing the initial prototype. Most recently, I have been involved in the development of the new READ 180—now called READ 180 Universal—ensuring that it first and foremost places the teacher in a central role in the program’s implementation, and then ensuring that it includes the most updated research and best practices in the field on how to effectively use technology to support instruction. With the dual benefit of teacher-facilitated instruction and the Student Application (Student App), READ 180 Universal is designed to provide personalized and individualized instruction that meets each student’s unique ability level, interests, and needs.
Well-designed blended learning solutions offer many positive benefits for our struggling students and allow teachers to do what they do best: teach with confidence and purpose. For example, some aspects of blended learning solutions that support teachers and students include technology that is:
As evidence of what makes blended learning solutions most efficacious has increased, so has awareness of the teacher’s role in making sure that the technology is being used appropriately. While new and adaptive technologies make it possible for all students, especially those who are struggling, to benefit from good instruction, technology is not magic. After all, students will not remember the computer that taught them to read; they will remember the teacher who changed their lives. The new READ 180 Universal was developed to support these life-changing teachers as they serve their students.
I firmly believe that READ 180 Universal will provide the support that all students need to thrive not only in an educational setting, but in life beyond school. This is most critical for students struggling with language, cognitive, and social-emotional needs. With the assistance of adaptive technology, quality instructional materials, and effective professional learning support for teachers, a much-needed lifeline can be provided to all students.
Dr. Ted HasselbringREAD 180 Program AuthorProfessor of Special EducationPeabody College of EducationVanderbilt University
Successfully reading a text for deep comprehension entails extracting and constructing meaning through an interaction between the text, task, and reader (Snow, 2002). Reading comprehension is an extremely complex task that encompasses several constructs, including language development, word recognition, text fluency, knowledge building, vocabulary, affective skills, and writing. It requires mastery and automaticity of these cognitive processes. As such, struggling readers typically benefit from identification of their individual strengths and weaknesses and intervention in one or more of these areas as needed. The editorial team at HMH has carefully considered the complexity of reading comprehension in the design and development of READ 180 Universal.
The goal of READ 180 Universal is to translate this theory into practice through a program that identifies and addresses the needs of each individual student. In designing READ 180 Universal, we have considered the interaction of these processes and subprocesses and developed a program that includes instruction, practice, assessment, and professional learning in each of them. As such, READ 180 Universal will allow every student to master and automatize each of the subprocesses required for fluent reading comprehension and reach the goal of comprehending and appreciating complex texts.
READ 180 Universal was developed with the era of rigorous standards foremost in our minds, especially with the intent to support students at risk for academic challenges. We firmly believe that all students can learn to read complex texts, and that the responsibility of learners’ literacy and language development is shared between the teacher and the student within the school, as well as with parents and community leaders outside the school. As such, we seek to provide teachers and parents with the tools necessary to be effective in building what Linda Darling-Hammond calls “shared responsibility” (Darling-Hammond, 2004). With READ 180 Universal, we intend to provide all teachers, students, and families with well-designed, comprehensive, and individualized learning opportunities that motivate students to reach their full potential.
Following the aspirations of heightened state standards, READ 180 Universal is designed to provide an exceptional educational experience for students by focusing on the importance of teachers, families, and the learning community in providing educational opportunities that meet the needs of each individual student. As such READ 180 Universal seeks to do the following:
At its core, READ 180 Universal aims to provide the learning opportunities that each unique student deserves:
In providing these opportunities, READ 180 Universal allows teachers to reach the goal of accelerating all students to grade-level independence.
READ 180 Universal is a new blended learning solution that incorporates up-to-date research and practice with a deep commitment to using evidence and efficacy to inform and inspire. The initial version of READ 180 was developed in 1999 and soon produced success stories in schools across the country. With the changing educational landscape, new versions of the program have been created to accommodate the needs of students from various backgrounds and reflect the growing body of reading research and technology innovation.
In 2004, READ 180 Enterprise Edition was developed in continued collaboration with Dr. Ted Hasselbring, who was joined by Dr. Kevin Feldman, Director of Reading and Early Intervention, Sonoma County Office of Education, and Dr. Kate Kinsella, adjunct faculty member, College of Education at San Francisco State University. The Enterprise Edition added structured engagement routines introduced in the rBook that ensure full participation by all learners, provided additional second-language support to English learners, and introduced SAM™ platform in order for teachers to better keep track of student data and progress.
In 2008, System 44® was launched as a Tier 3 solution for students who were struggling the most. The program is designed to provide students with systematic instruction on the foundational literacy skills necessary to progress toward reading comprehension.
In 2011, READ 180 Next Generation was launched to provide teachers with a simpler, easier-to-use instructional system with a more directed path for data-driven differentiated instruction, as well as to increase writing instruction and to give students more ownership of their learning.
Along these lines, READ 180 Universal was developed to provide students with even more personalized, individualized, and engaging instruction. This newest version targets what we know about the brain and how children learn in many different ways—from executive functioning to specific cognitive skills to social and emotional intelligence—and provides them with the language supports necessary for successful learning.
Each new version of READ 180 has been built upon a foundation of careful, thorough research in consultation with renowned educational researchers as well as educator experiences and best practices. As the results of 40 research studies published in our latest READ 180 compendium show, from 2000 to 2015, the program has been successful with students of diverse backgrounds, including English learners, students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged students, and students of various ethnicities in California and across the nation.
Given the current federal push for evidence of return on investment in education spending, a study conducted by Whiteboard Advisors (2012) in Napa Valley Unified School District found that, in addition to READ 180 students making significant gains on the state assessment, the district tracked lower referral rates into special education, as well as lower numbers of expulsions and suspensions since implementing the program.
Additional studies have found READ 180 to be effective for English learners. In a bronze level study conducted in Deer Valley Unified School District, Arizona, fourth- through eighth-grade English learners made significant gains on the state reading test and HMH Reading Inventory® after using READ 180 for a year (2012). Likewise, in Lawrence Public Schools, Massachusetts, elementary, middle, and high school English learners showed significant achievement gains on state assessments after using READ 180 (2009).
Results of the 2006 to 2011 Striving Readers gold level studies conducted in school districts—four of which used READ 180 for a period ranging from one to five years—showed significant increases in reading achievement for struggling readers. In Newark, New Jersey, significant impacts were reported for all students, including student groups such as boys, African Americans, and students with disabilities. READ 180 was shown to have a significantly positive impact on incarcerated students in the Ohio Department of Youth Services facilities, the majority of whom were male and African American, and a large percentage of whom were students with disabilities. Additionally, READ 180 was shown to have a significantly positive impact for students in the urban-suburban school district of Springfield-Chicopee, Massachusetts, and the urban school district of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, both of which contain large percentages of economically disadvantaged students.
In 2009, a What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) review determined that the extent of evidence for the impact of READ 180 on student achievement is medium to large for the outcome domains of general literacy achievement and comprehension (WWC, 2009). In a more recent study published in the peer-reviewed journal Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, READ 180 was shown to have a significantly positive effect on reading comprehension and vocabulary for fourth- through sixth-grade students (Kim et al., 2011).
Teachers are the most integral component of effective, personalized learning programs. In designing READ 180 Universal, the essential role of the teacher in providing personalized learning was recognized. In addition to the crucial role of the teacher, five strands that have been identified as effective in accelerating implementation of technology-enabled personalized learning (National Summit, 2014) were considered in the development of the program. Below is a description of these strands and how the design of READ 180 Universal applies to them.
STRAND 1: DATA
Personalized learning requires a robust, timely, and dynamic picture of student performance, preferences, and needs. Teachers need real-time access to meaningful data to more effectively guide students’ learning experiences. Having meaningful data such as ongoing and embedded performance data, information on student learning strategies, preferences and interests, and other non-academic information regarding the whole child’s needs allows teachers to work at maximum capacity.
READ 180 Universal allows for this by providing timely, actionable data to students, teachers, and school leaders in order to inform instruction and to more effectively personalize the learning. READ 180 Universal’s real-time data and student assessments help teachers pinpoint exactly where individual students must focus so they can master the foundations of reading and move toward more advanced skills such as higher-order thinking, problem solving, and academic writing.
STRAND 2: CONTENT AND CURRICULUM
Personalized technology allows for “recommendation engines” that guide instruction based on student data, student choices and interests, and teacher insight. In this way, both teachers and students play a major role in determining the content and curriculum that will be most effective for students. Recommendation engine systems allow for the optimal matching of learning opportunities with student needs and preferences in order to create maximal learning environments.
READ 180 Universal’s Student Application (Student App) identifies where students are and helps them learn at their own pace to get them where they need to be. Powered by the FASTT (Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology) algorithm underlying READ 180 Universal, the Student App provides students with repeated structured practice with limited sets of new material, which is how the brain learns best. READ 180 Universal provides teachers with tools to help inform instruction through student data, grouping tools, and observation tools. The grouping tool on the Teacher Dashboard groups students according to their specific needs identified through ongoing assessment, allowing teachers to easily and efficiently plan differentiated instruction and intervention.
STRAND 3: TECHNOLOGY ARCHITECTURE
Technology architecture refers to enterprise systems that can access and manage data, content, and communications. It creates an integrated approach to curriculum that allows access to information anytime and anywhere. These types of platforms are needed for school systems to gather and analyze assessment and other data, deliver multi-modal and universally designed resources, and match these two areas based on ongoing assessment of student performance and needs.
In READ 180 Universal, teachers and leaders have access to HMH Teacher Central®, a platform that gives educators real-time, actionable data and reports. HMH Teacher Central is a comprehensive online management system that collects and organizes READ 180 Universal student performance data. This includes a suite of reports that can be accessed through individual Teacher Dashboards and Leadership Dashboards. HMH Teacher Central management system supports teachers in decision making on placement, grouping, and instruction, as well as monitoring progress. It supports schools in meeting Adequate Yearly Progress in accountability requirements and districtwide data aggregation for teachers, district administrators, and technology coordinators.
STRAND 4: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Since teachers and students are at the center of personalized learning, research an development is necessary in order to translate the vision of this type of learning into effective implementation of it. Cognitive and brain science research, adaptive tutorial software development, and change management and professional development best practices are needed for effective school redesign into a student-centered model.
READ 180 Universal is the result of decades of iterative research constantly informing and enhancing program development. In 1999, READ 180 was born out of a research partnership between practitioners, scholars, and the HMH Intervention Solutions team. READ 180 Universal incorporates seminal and current advancements in research and understanding of learning strategies, best instructional practices, and the latest technology developments. READ 180 Universal further benefits from its academic authors, who ensure that the program best reflects their areas of expertise.
STRAND 5: HUMAN CAPACITY
Technology plays a role in making personalized learning effective; however, teachers play the primary role in ensuring that the technology-enabled personalized learning will be successful. Systems must be designed with the input of all stakeholders, including teachers, students, administrators, and families. The technology-enabled personalized learning, approached in a systematic way and with the teacher as the key player, should be viewed as integral to student learning.
READ 180 Universal allows for this by putting the teacher front and center and designing the technology in a way that meets the needs of teachers, students, and parents. READ 180 Universal is designed with the understanding that achieving reading success with upper-elementary and secondary students requires more than teaching reading strategies. The development process for READ 180 Universal included user and pilot testing with students, teachers, administrators, and families. As a result, READ 180 Universal’s blended learning approach helps teachers, administrators, and families support competencies and capacities in students that are pivotal for advancing from struggling reader to competent reader.
In the READ 180 Universal instructional model, Whole-Group Learning, Student Application (Student App), Small-Group Learning, and Independent Reading are Station Rotations that are all utilized to maximize learning and teacher effectiveness.
Whole-Group Learning: Using a blended learning model, teachers begin each class by facilitating instruction in reading skills and strategies, content-area and academic vocabulary, writing, conventions, and academic discussions to the whole class. The class completes multiple readings of engaging, grade-level texts that increase in complexity using a gradual release model. In the beginning of this gradual release approach, the teacher reads the text aloud to students, modeling fluency and guiding students to an understanding of the text’s central ideas. Whole-Group Learning also includes systematic instruction in vocabulary and writing. Vocabulary instruction helps students strengthen their language skills. Scaffolded writing instruction models and helps students develop writing skills and culminates in an essay-length writing activity. The teacher guides students in analyzing a model text and then uses routines to help students internalize the writing process.
Student Application (Student App): Students work independently on the READ 180 Universal Student App, where they follow a path that allows them to work within their zone of proximal development. Each segment of the Student App consists of six zones that provide targeted instruction, practice, and feedback on the components of reading for which students need the most assistance: Explore Zone, Reading Zone, Language Zone, Fluency Zone, Writing Zone, and Success Zone. The students move through the zones on individualized paths that take their performance on assessments and previous Student App activities, engagement, interests, and teacher inputs into consideration.
Small-Group Learning: Students receive individualized, data-driven instruction that meets their unique learning needs while building meaningful relationships with their teachers. During text-based lessons, the teacher facilitates a close reading exploration of the text in small groups. The teacher models essential reading strategies and then guides students in a collaborative analysis and discussion of the text. During writing lessons, the teacher guides student collaboration on writing tasks. Students are able to share ideas and give and receive feedback from their peers at all stages of the writing process. The evidence-based instructional routines build engagement and foster high-level thinking. Small-Group Learning is a true formative experience: the teacher has supports to quickly check student understanding during instruction as well as options to adjust instruction based on in-the-moment data.
Independent Reading: Students engage with complex, content-rich literature and informational texts that they can read with success. Students can apply comprehension strategies they are taught, including context clues, making inferences, cause and effect, and more. The READ 180 Universal Independent Reading rotation is designed to foster accountable independent reading in students. Specifically, during Independent Reading, students complete graph organizers and after, students take an HMH Reading Counts!® quiz. The library consists of print books and digital reads. The digital library consists of both eBooks and eReads, which are relevant, current, and engaging articles of differing modalities and length. In addition, the READ 180 Universal library includes audiobooks in which an audio coach models fluent reading and reading-comprehension strategies throughout the text.
Station Rotations: After Whole-Group Learning, students rotate between Student App, Small-Group Learning, and Independent Reading stations at the teacher’s discretion. As students rotate through the stations, they receive explicit instruction, guided practice, and personalized feedback on the internalization of new content and learning strategies—and then reconvene for a Whole-Group Wrap-Up to reinforce what they have learned.
READ 180 Universal is informed by an extensive evidence base of best practices for serving struggling adolescent readers. In the following section, relevant information from the research base and expert opinion is presented alongside descriptions of how these research foundations have been translated into the curriculum and instructional design of the program.
Five principles help to explain the relationship between students’ brains and the task of learning to read:
Comprehending text involves disparate processes, from perceiving words, to identifying text structures, to understanding the relationships between characters in a story. These processes are associated with activation in different parts of the brain. Neuroscience research has found that, when a student reads about an action or emotion, the activation in the brain is consistent with the student experiencing that action or emotion. For example, when a student reads about a character riding a bike, the parts of the brain responsible for helping the student ride a bike are activated (Rose, 2014; Wehbe et al., 2014).
Activation patterns in the brains of good readers and struggling readers differ dramatically. The reading circuits in the brains of struggling readers are more scattered and less established than in the brains of good readers. But research has demonstrated that intensive instruction in and deliberate practice of reading skills and strategies can change the way that struggling readers’ brains work. Technology-based reading instruction can identify a student’s weaknesses, alert the teacher for individualized instruction, and give the student personalized, targeted practice (Cunningham & Rose, 2013).
Comprehension occurs as a cluster of skills that develop simultaneously. Among these skills are higher-order processes, such as inference generation and reasoning, that allow readers to recognize meaningful relationships among text elements and between text elements and background knowledge (Kendeou, van den Broek, White, & Lynch, 2009; Cutting & Scarborough, 2006).
Higher-order cognitive skills, such as making inferences and planning and organizing information, help students comprehend more complex text and question types. As such, developing these higher-order skills is important to reading growth as students progress in school (Eason, Goldberg, Young, Geist, & Cutting, 2012).
Systematic instruction and practice help students learn executive function skills such as setting goals, planning, organizing and prioritizing materials, managing time, being cognitively flexible, self-monitoring, and self-reflecting (Meltzer, 2007). Neuroscientific brain research shows that when students understand the goals of their work, they are more likely to stay focused, self-monitor, and appreciate their own progress (Medina, 2014; Rose, Meyer, Strangman, & Rappolt, 2002).
Reading aloud to students exposes them to a broader vocabulary of words in a different “voice,” brings students and teachers together in a communal way, and allows the brain to have new experiences and imagine different worlds in which people react in different ways to different situations (Medina, 2014).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal instruction incorporates the latest research and principles of how the brain learns to read. The content within the program engages and motivates students, resulting in activation of disparate parts of the brain that are vital to reading with comprehension. READ 180 Universal is a comprehensive reading intervention program that addresses the needs of struggling readers and provides instruction, support, and practice in the areas that are most needed for each individual student. The authors of the program carefully considered the strengths and weaknesses of specific student populations and designed instruction that will meet their needs at a variety of levels. Data from assessments and the Student Application (Student App) rotation are leveraged to identify students’ specific needs, strengths, and interests to target instruction in the areas that students need assistance.
Anchor Videos activate and strengthen vocabulary and background knowledge circuits in the brain, allowing students to comprehend and link passages to their existing knowledge. Structured practice in decoding, encoding, and reading words fluently allows students to automate those processes and focus their cognitive attention on the difficult work of comprehending complex text. The engaging and motivating texts that students encounter encourage them to work through their struggles and persist even when the passage is challenging.
Learning to read skillfully is a complex process that begins with foundational literacy skills. When these foundational skills have been strategically and automatically mastered, skilled reading with comprehension can occur. As the research shows, students’ knowledge of the correspondence between sounds and spellings determines their ability to read single words with speed and accuracy, which in turn predicts their ability to read and comprehend texts (Adams & Bruck, 1995; Scarborough, 2002; Wagner, 2008).
Struggling readers are likely to suffer from deficits in phonemic awareness and phonological processing. These deficits may not be evident until the third or fourth grade and are likely to impede reading ability throughout the lifespan without intervention (Lipka, Lesaux, & Siegel, 2006).
Direct instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics improves word recognition skills, which in turn improves reading comprehension. Explicit and systematic literacy instruction that focuses on foundational skills taught in the context of meaningful, level-appropriate text has proven especially important to improved reading abilities for struggling readers and students with disabilities (Adams, 1990; National Early Literacy Panel, 2008; National Reading Panel, 2000; National Research Council, 1998).
Multisensory learning approaches allow students to master the foundational literacy skills necessary for comprehension. Providing direct, systematic, sequential, and cumulative instruction in phonology and phonological awareness, sound-symbol association, syllable instruction, morphology, syntax, and comprehension allows for the fluency and automaticity of word recognition required for skilled reading (Birch, 2011; McIntyre & Pickering, 1995).
Foundational reading instruction should be integrated with opportunities to read meaningful connected text as part of a coherent instructional approach (Adams, 1990; Moats, 2012; Strickland, 2011).
Rigorous state standards stress that “foundational skills are not an end in and of themselves; rather, they are necessary and important components of an effective, comprehensive reading program designed to develop proficient readers with the capacity to comprehend text across a range of types and disciplines” (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010, p. 15).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
Each Workshop in READ 180 Universal begins with a text designed to allow students to practice and build fluency. This text is written with decodable words, sight words, and other elements that make the text considerate—and includes foundational skills instruction and practice to help students automate the word recognition and reading processes. The workshop fluency texts provide practice and reinforce skills and patterns that students learn on the Student Application (Student App) as they build reading fluency.
READ 180 Universal provides explicit, systematic instruction in the research-based foundational and higher-order comprehension skills and strategies necessary for understanding text. These skills and strategies, from word decoding to making inferences, are modeled in Whole-and Small-Groups, practiced in Student App, and applied during Independent Reading.
The HMH Teacher Central guides teachers in leading Whole-and Small-Group lessons in which they teach, model, and guide practice in comprehension and critical-thinking skills and strategies, using a wide range of expository and narrative texts. A gradual release approach is used throughout READ 180 Universal teacher-led instruction and in the Student App, which provides scaffolding for students as they learn to internalize comprehension skills and strategies.
READ 180 Universal instruction is designed to systematically bolster students’ comprehension of text before, during, and after reading, using research-based techniques that are beneficial to struggling readers, English learners, and students with disabilities. Before reading, Anchor Videos, teacher-led lessons, and vocabulary development lessons in the Student App help students activate prior knowledge and build mental models of new concepts. During reading, the Student App helps students comprehend the text by providing definitions for unfamiliar words, identifying signal and vocabulary words in the text, and personalizing coaching and feedback to keep the students on task and encourage them to use helpful supports. Finally, READ 180 Universal instruction includes activities and routines to assess and reinforce comprehension after reading.
Language should be used in the classroom to bridge information gaps, to communicate ideas and information, and to “get things done.” The purpose of language is to communicate in real-life ways. To meet rigorous standards, students need to learn how to use language to clearly communicate their ideas around what they are learning (Zwiers, 2014).
Academic language refers to the form of the English language that is expected in situations such as the discussion of topics across the curriculum, making arguments, defending propositions, and synthesizing information. Written and spoken academic discussion is significantly different from informal discussion as academic language is characterized by specific types of vocabulary, text structures, and grammatical structures (Dutro & Kinsella, 2010; Snow, 2010).
Instruction for English learners should emphasize academic language, specifically the specialized language associated with academic instruction and content areas. Students that receive instruction in and are able to use decontextualized academic language are more likely to be successful than students who use contextualized social language (California Department of Education, 2010).
Research shows that there is a strong reciprocal relationship between reading comprehension and knowledge of both conversational and academic language (Baumann, Kame’enui, & Ash, 2003; Duke & Pearson, 2002; Gersten, Fuchs, Williams, & Baker, 2001).
The interaction between academic language and academic content is a great challenge for English learners, thus contributing to gaps in achievement between ELs and English-proficient students (Anstrom, DiCerbo, Butler, Katz, Millet, & Rivera, 2010). English learners bring meaningful experiences and content knowledge to the classroom that can be leveraged to accelerate their language development. Expert opinion supports incorporating structured peer discussions around relevant content-area literacy instruction so that students have multiple opportunities to practice and hear academic language—especially important for English learners and those who speak nonstandard dialects of English (Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2002; Dutro & Kinsella, 2010).
To add new academic words to their expressive vocabularies, students need structured classroom contexts that offer frequent and accountable opportunities to use the new terminology in their speaking, listening, and writing (Feldman & Kinsella, 2008).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to developing the language skills of students. Through carefully scaffolded reading, writing, and speaking activities, students learn the phonological, morphological, syntactical, and semantic structures of English—particularly academic English. In Whole- and Small-Group Learning, high-utility academic vocabulary is taught through a research-based instructional routine, promoting understanding of words that students will encounter in all subject areas.
In each Whole- and Small-Group lesson, teachers teach and assess two or three language goals focused on vocabulary, language functions, and language of reading, writing, and speaking. Language functions stem from the linguistic demands of a lesson task and focus on high-leverage language that will serve students in other contexts. Across the year in READ 180 Universal, students develop expressive language skills to:
READ 180 Universal also provides explicit and systematic instruction through Whole- and Small-Group Learning in word learning strategies, giving students the tools they need to learn new words independently. Recursive vocabulary in reading selections encourages frequent review, practice, and reinforcement of targeted words. Independent reading materials in READ 180 Universal provide further exposure to increasingly advanced vocabulary and include supports such as graphic organizers to help students comprehend the vocabulary and content.
At the beginning of each segment of the Student Application (Student App), students complete the Explore Zone. In the Explore Zone, students are introduced to context-relevant vocabulary words in the Anchor Video and then complete activities that activate their vocabulary and real-world knowledge before reading the passage. During the Language Zone of Student App, students build and expand their academic vocabulary knowledge through language-based activities that investigate word families, words in context, synonyms and antonyms, and examples and non-examples. Students complete practice activities using definitions and context sentences for each word—crucial supports that can help struggling readers and English learners alike acquire vocabulary as they read. In the Reading Zone, students practice words-in-context skills during the Close Read activity, which includes words-in-context questions for three power words per level.
In the READ 180 Universal ReaL Book, students have the opportunity to practice the academic language they have learned in Whole-and Small-Group Learning in discussions with their peers. These discussions help to develop students’ oral language skills using the language of school. Giving students time to practice and develop oral language is especially helpful for those students who are struggling readers, English learners, and students with disabilities.
People construct new knowledge and understandings based on their existing knowledge (Bransford et al., 2000). Research shows that background knowledge is critical to reading proficiency (Adams, 2009; Lee & Spratley, 2010; Torgesen et al., 2007). Knowledge of subject matter is necessary in order to understand what is read (Hirsch & Pondiscio, 2010).
Content knowledge and reading are inextricably intertwined—reading will never progress beyond decoding without a foundation of content knowledge. The ability to comprehend a text depends greatly on the knowledge of the subject that the reader brings to that text. A program that enriches the knowledge of students is a must for reading improvement (Hirsch, 2014).
In order to build content knowledge, students must read an adequate number of high-quality, complex, and engaging texts that allow them to study a topic for a sustained period of time. Infusing these content-rich texts into the English Language Arts curriculum allows students to spend an extended part of the school day not only reading, but also gaining knowledge that will allow them to read more complex texts in the future (Wattenberg, 2014).
Some students face barriers to learning because the representation of information assumes certain critical background knowledge and content knowledge. Since there is such a wide range of individual differences among students, ensuring that all students have equal opportunities to learn requires providing options and alternatives, such as videos that anchor instruction (CAST, 2011).
Within software, both direct, explicit instruction and providing structured problem-solving guidance can be effective at enhancing anchored instruction, each at different levels depending on the complexity of the task. The most effective interactive learning environments take into consideration the needs of a particular situation (Zydney, Bathke, & Hasselbring, 2014).
Dynamic images and sounds are especially helpful for students with limited background knowledge and English learners (Hasselbring & Glaser, 2000; Lacina, 2004). Using multiple representations of video information with struggling students gives them an authentic base of experience in abstract domains, thus making the abstract information more concrete (Heo, 2007).
Mini-anchors may be a valuable approach to use for creating adaptable learning environments. They serve as a prescription for how to individualize instruction by embedding multiple, short, video-based scenarios within a computer-based program. In this way, mini anchors provide learners with multiple ways to perceive, engage with, and interact with instructional content (Zydney & Hasselbring, 2014).
Successful readers have a strong vocabulary, background knowledge on a diversity of topics, and fluency that allows them to focus on the meaning of the text. These readers gain exponentially more vocabulary, knowledge, and fluency as they read, which allows them to read more texts and build their knowledge base even more. Struggling readers continue to fall further and further behind because they can’t access the knowledge and understanding of successful readers. This rich-get-richer and poor-get-poorer outcome is known as the Matthew Effect (Stanovich, 1986). Without early and effective intervention, struggling readers never gain the background knowledge they need to be effective readers and only fall further and further behind.
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal is designed to help students acquire and activate the background and content knowledge that is essential to reading comprehension. Before reading a text in a Workshop or in the Student Application (Student App), students watch an Anchor Video that provides them with the content and vocabulary knowledge they need to comprehend the text. These Anchor Videos not only contribute immediately to improved comprehension of the texts that students read, but also give students knowledge that they can transfer to unfamiliar texts, allowing them to build more knowledge and continue to read more in a virtuous cycle.
At the core of READ 180 Universal are multitudes of informational texts that stretch across the content areas, such as social studies, science, literature and the arts, and contemporary social issues in order to build the domain knowledge that is critical to reading comprehension. By spending an extended period of time within a Knowledge Cluster, students are able to develop the knowledge that comes from deep and meaningful study of a topic. Through this engaging, diverse content, READ 180 Universal readings help students develop the strong base of world knowledge and interdisciplinary literacy skills that they need in order to better comprehend texts across the curriculum.
READ 180 Universal makes systematic and extensive use of mental models to help students build background knowledge and improve comprehension of texts. READ 180 Universal exposes students to multiple text types in order to build students’ world knowledge and prepare them to comprehend across the content areas. The content in all components of READ 180 Universal reflects diverse perspectives, allowing students to both reflect on their own experiences and explore new concepts and points of view.
The Anchor Videos included in the READ 180 Universal Student App and Workshops introduce students to the concepts and vocabulary they will need to access the related text passages. The videos and subsequent language development activities aid students in developing a mental picture of what they are about to read, resulting in improved comprehension. The combination of video and vocabulary support is especially helpful for English learners who may have gaps in context information and/or academic language.
READ 180 Universal teacher-led instruction further supports the building of background knowledge to enhance comprehension. HMH Teacher Central includes specific instructional routines to prepare students for reading, such as the academic discussion routine which helps build background about a particular concept that is critical to the Workshop texts. As part of this routine, students brainstorm, write, exchange, record, and report on their ideas. Students also use the Vocabulary routine to learn key content-area vocabulary words that appear in subsequent texts. This routine enables students to learn new themes, discuss examples, and practice using the vocabulary prior to encountering these words in texts. In addition, Resources for Differentiated Instruction in HMH Teacher Central include lessons that teachers can use to build students’ background knowledge and promote mental model development during Whole-Group Instruction.
The Common Core State Standards require that all students read grade-level, complex texts, but many readers are not able to do so independently. Thoughtful and informed instruction and scaffolding can help students tackle complex text. Teaching students how to pay close attention to the text, reread, annotate the text with notes in the margin, identify the author’s purpose and text structure, circle confusing words or sections, talk about the text with others, and ask text-dependent questions can be beneficial in helping students comprehend complex text (Liben & Liben, 2013).
There are many factors that contribute to the complexity of a text. In addition to word difficulty, sentence length, and sentence structure, the genre and structure of the text can also affect the readability of a passage. Texts in familiar genres and that are well structured with signal words are easier to read than unfamiliar, less-structured texts (Williams et al., 2014). Another factor that contributes to text complexity is cohesion, or the characteristics of the text that help the reader connect ideas in the text. Texts have several layers of cohesion: within sentences, within paragraphs, and across the texts (Graesser, McNamara, & Kulikowich, 2011). It is important to consider all of these factors when assessing the complexity and readability of a text.
Reading is fundamental for meeting life goals, such as becoming informed, accomplishing tasks, pursuing interests, and raising children. Unless students learn how to read texts of real-world complexity, they will be unprepared for college, careers, and life in general. When students read complex texts, they gain new language and knowledge that they need in order to access ever more advanced texts (Adams, 2009; 2011).
Immersion in complex texts is one of the best ways to help students develop mature language skills and the conceptual knowledge they need for success in school and beyond (Bridges, 2014).
Studies indicate that exposure to a wide range of texts strengthens understanding of the relationships among different words and concepts—building a “word consciousness” that enables the reader to more easily interpret the meanings of previously unencountered words (Adams, 2009).
For students to acquire the language of literacy, or academic language, they must encounter these structures and patterns in the materials they read. Providing students with exposure to complex texts allows them access to academic language, and having them interact with the texts allows them to discover how academic language works (Fillmore & Fillmore, 2012).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal guides students from highly supported reading toward independent mastery of increasingly complex text, enabling students of all reading levels to access content-rich complex texts. HMH has created a version of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) text complexity triangle. The Text Complexity Triangle, shown on the opposite page, measures the three components of text complexity as outlined by CCSS: Quantitative (Lexile® measure), Qualitative, and Reader & Task.
ReaL Book Workshops include two types of texts: Fluency Texts and Workshop Texts. The first text in a Workshop is always a fluency text that introduces the Workshop topic, and serves to build knowledge about the topic. Workshop texts that follow are more complex and represent a variety of text types and lengths. The texts within a ReaL Book Workshop are sequenced to build on each other in order of increasing difficulty. The background knowledge and vocabulary that students develop from initial selections allow them to move from simple to more complex text. The Teacher’s Edition Planning Guide includes a Heads Up section with challenges that students may experience with each text. Multiple reads, explicit vocabulary learning, teacher-led close reading, and ReaL Book scaffolds support students as they work toward reading increasingly complex and grade-level texts.
The Qualitative Components of text complexity considered by READ 180 Universal include those identified by Coh-Metrix as the most important factors in readability: narrativity, syntactic simplicity, word concreteness, referential cohesion, and deep cohesion (Graesser, McNamara, & Kulikowich, 2011). As students progress through the Student Application (Student App), the texts that they encounter become relatively more complex in each of these dimensions. The relative complexity of each of these dimensions is offset by the other dimensions, providing scaffolds for the students to read and comprehend increasingly complex texts.
READ 180 Universal provides teachers with the tools to expertly match reader to text and task. The variety and volume of texts in READ 180 Universal provide varying degrees of complexity and scaffolding, allowing students to access texts at the appropriate level of challenge and move toward independence. The adaptive technology in READ 180 Universal customizes instruction and practice according to students’ Lexile measures and other quantitative and qualitative factors that make up the student’s learner profile, providing continual opportunities for all students, including English learners and students with disabilities, to experience success and demonstrate progress. Throughout READ 180 Universal, each reading is marked with an icon displaying its Lexile measure and complexity level to assist teachers in effectively matching readers with appropriately leveled texts.
Using the above dimensions, each Workshop entails a series of increasingly complex texts—a diverse array of classic and contemporary literature as well as challenging informational texts in a range of subjects. Each Workshop supports students in accessing complex texts through a narrow reading approach in which students read a series of increasingly challenging texts with overlapping topics and recurring academic vocabulary. Each new text builds on the previous media and texts, providing students with the background knowledge, vocabulary, and confidence needed to access complex texts that might otherwise have been too challenging.
Explicit and systematic cognitive research that has been conducted over many decades has revealed that reading not only builds our brains; it also exercises our intelligence (Bridges, 2014). Reading is a rich, complex, and cognitive act that provides us with a great opportunity to exercise our intelligence in ways that we lose if we do not read (Cunningham & Zibulsky, 2013).
Decades of research have shown us that avid readers are also skillful readers and writers. They have more knowledge about the conventions of language in areas such as spelling, punctuation, grammar, and vocabulary. They also know more about the world (Bridges, 2014).
Students will not become successful independent readers unless they are given the chance to practice reading independently. By giving students the opportunity to choose texts in which they are interested, they will be able to read more complex texts because they are motivated and often knowledgeable about the topic (Liben & Liben, 2013).
Half of children ages 6–17 who read independently as a class or school (52%) say it’s one of their favorite parts of the day and wish it would happen more often. Almost all children in this age range (91%) say that their favorite books are ones that they choose themselves. One-third of children aged 6–17 (33%) say their class has a designated time during the school day to read a book of their choice independently, but only 17% do this every or almost every school day (Scholastic, 2015).
Findings from the Kids & Family Reading Report (2015) showed that 54% of children ages 0–5 are read aloud to at home five to seven days a week, and 40% of children ages 6–11 who are no longer read aloud to at home wish that they were. Among a wide range of age groups, 83% of kids say that they liked a lot the times that their parents read to them aloud at home, and they wish their parents had continued to read to them after they reached school age.
It is important that parents and teachers read to their children and students every day. Reading aloud together is one of the best ways for children to learn to read. The most important thing is to let children set their own pace and have fun during the experience (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2015).
Although 61% of children have read an ebook, a nearly equal number—65%—agree that they’ll always want to read books in print (Scholastic, 2015), making it important to offer texts in both mediums to engage all learners.
Research on students’ use of digital and print text suggests that middle-grade students could benefit from direct instruction for comprehending digital text along with practice interacting with digital texts. In particular, students need to develop better strategies for making sense of digital text instead of over-applying the strategies they use with print text (Davis & Neitzel, 2012).
Respected literacy researchers Gina Biancarosa and Gina S. Griffiths (2014) offer several recommendations for teachers to integrate technology and digital texts into their existing classroom routines. In particular, they argue that technology should be viewed as one tool many teachers use to prepare students for literacy in a digital age. When incorporating digital tools into a classroom, their recommendations include selecting evidence-based technology, providing ongoing support to teachers using the technology, and making good use of the data provided by the technology.
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal ensures that students make reading part of their daily routine by dedicating one of the three Station Rotations to independent reading. Texts in the Independent Reading rotation provide engaging content that is delivered at the appropriate level of the student. Students also have the option of choosing more challenging texts that are aligned with their interests.
Independent reading is designed to foster student choice and a love of reading, but also includes checkpoints for accountability and teacher insight on student progress. The READ 180 Universal Independent Reading library consists of print books and digital reads, including eBooks and eReads, as well as audiobooks that model fluency and reading comprehension strategies. Students are provided scaffolds for eReads, which are relevant, current, and engaging articles of differing modalities and lengths. Two of the eReads that are included in the library are a story of a teen that survived the Boston Marathon bombing and the story of a teen trapped in a deadly storm who survived using tips he learned on reality TV.
READ 180 Universal offers Independent Reading supports for students and teachers. In the digital Independent Reading experience, students can access additional supports, such as text-to-speech as well as a dictionary. The resources available to teachers include:
After finishing an Independent Reading book, students can take HMH Reading Counts! quizzes. When students log on to HMH Reading Counts!, they see the books they have completed and can then choose to take either an HMH Reading Counts! quiz or a H.O.T. Quiz—the latter of which is a more challenging quiz. The choices that students make will give the teacher insight into their mindsets, motivation, and challenge-seeking behaviors. The teacher will know how many books students have read and how they have challenged themselves. Students will also complete reading logs to track their progress toward the goals they set at the beginning of the year. Students can log their progress in ReaL Book or during the Student Application (Student App) or Independent Reading rotation.
The ability to write effectively is critical to reading development. Writing instruction can have a positive impact on students’ reading skills and comprehension, particularly when students analyze and interpret texts in writing, write summaries, and answer questions about them in writing (Graham & Hebert, 2010).
Reading and writing go hand in hand. By identifying and explicitly discussing the features of different texts, teachers can support students’ comprehension and offer models for writing (Schleppegrell, 2009).
Teachers can use writing instruction as a tool to promote knowledge and as a mechanism for higher-order thinking (Graham & Hebert, 2010). To be well-prepared for college, the workplace, and life, students need opportunities to develop critical thinking skills, discussing and critiquing different viewpoints in order to form and justify their own stance (Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy, 2010; Lewis & Moorman, 2007).
Instructional programs that incorporate units of study stress the reading-writing connection as students engage in higher-order thinking skills, such as reading and writing about a wide range of text types, comparing and contrasting the structure of complex texts, and analyzing how an author’s writing decisions contribute to the text’s structure and meaning (Pytash & Morgan, 2013; National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010).
Meta-analyses of writing instruction, including studies of struggling writers, have found several strategies to have moderate to strong evidence for improving student writing including: (a) teaching students strategies for planning, drafting, sharing, evaluating, revising, and editing; (b) teaching students procedures for regulating the writing strategies they are taught; (c) teaching students spelling, handwriting, and keyboarding; (d) setting clear and specific writing goals; and (e) giving students opportunities to work together to plan, draft, revise, and edit their papers (Graham, McKeown et al., 2012; Graham, Harris, & Santalego, in press; Graham & Perin, 2007a, 2007b.)
English learners need significant, structured opportunities to engage in academic discourse through speaking and writing (Francis et al., 2006; Kinsella & Feldman, 2005). For English learners, structured approaches to teaching writing have been found to be more effective than approaches without structure or scaffolds (Shanahan & Beck, 2006).
All students, especially English learners, will benefit from writing instruction that teaches them how English works. This instruction will help students gain an understanding of text structure and cohesion, use nouns, verbs, and adjectives effectively to expand and enrich ideas, and connect and condense ideas within sentences (California Department of Education, 2012).
Writers must know about what they write in order to communicate important information. Central to effective writing is the means to express language and thought in a way that allows readers to understand what the writer is saying. Before beginning to write, students should understand both the complex ideas that they would like to convey as well as the necessary grammatical structures needed to convey them effectively (Vermont Writing Collaborative, 2015).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal embraces the reciprocal relationship between reading and writing and provides the rigorous writing instruction that is necessary for students to become proficient readers and writers. Based on the research of Dr. Steve Graham and Dr. Karen Harris, students learn a process to successfully plan, organize, and write (POW) responses to text. Students have multiple opportunities to write narrative, informative, and argument pieces, and they learn, practice, and apply strategies specific to each of these genres.
In addition to a strategy that will guide them through the writing process, students will learn genre-specific strategies to use as they plan and write narrative, informative, and argument pieces.
In narrative writing, students learn, practice, and apply the WWW+2 strategy; in informative writing, students learn, practice, and apply the TIDE strategy; and in argument writing, students learn, practice, and apply the TREE strategy.
Throughout Whole- and Small-Group Learning, READ 180 Universal writing instruction emphasizes writing with a purpose and writing that develops content knowledge and reading skills. These purposeful writing activities, and the associated discussions, help students to log the “miles on the tongue” that Dr. Kate Kinsella has found is vitally important to language development for English learners. READ 180 Universal writing instruction provides carefully guided opportunities for students to engage in many different types of writing, from simple sentences to multi-paragraph essays. In paragraph-length constructed response writings and multi-paragraph essays, students follow the steps of the writing process: planning writing, organizing ideas using graphic organizers, composing a draft, and revising for clarity, conventions, and purpose. Writing is then shared through peer feedback and a variety of publishing opportunities. This systematically scaffolded writing process helps students explore and extend their knowledge through writing and guides them in clearly conveying ideas using academic language.
Throughout READ 180 Universal, grammar, usage, and mechanics are taught systematically and in context in accordance with the research of Dr. Kate Kinsella. Analyzing and evaluating a model paper before writing helps make expectations transparent and aids struggling writers in visualizing the demands of the assignment. After writing, students use the routines they are taught during Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning to read, score, and respond to a partner’s writing. These multiple opportunities for feedback provide the support that students—including English learners and students with disabilities—need to gain confidence and independence with English grammar and writing for academic purposes.
In the Student Application (Student App), the Writing Zone engages students in writing activities at appropriate levels of complexity with the supports and scaffolds they need in order to be successful writers. Students practice the WWW+2, TIDE, and TREE strategies and receive the scaffolds, including sentence frames, sentence starters, and graphic organizers, that are most appropriate to their writing levels. They receive immediate personalized feedback in addition to the more detailed feedback provided by peers and their teachers.
Students’ academic mindsets play an important role in making them more engaged in learning, more resilient in the face of setbacks, and more academically successful. A report by the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research (CCCR) defined four important beliefs that make up academic mindset: a sense of belonging, self-efficacy, relevance/purpose, and growth mindset (Farrington et al., 2012).
Growth mindset is the belief that through effort and perseverance one can become better at something. Engagement, motivation, choice, ownership, and a growth mindset are intimately related (Dweck, 2007; Glei, 2013).
There have been numerous additions to the growth mindset literature in recent years (Blackwell et al., 2007; Cohen, Garcia, Purdie-Vaughns, Apfel, & Brzustoski, 2009; Yeager, Walton, Ritter, & Dweck, 2013). The Blackwell et al. (2007) study found that after eight growth mindset sessions in which students learned that intelligence can change over time, the students outperformed a control group on grade point averages. Additionally, a study by Greenleaf et al. (2011) found similar results for interventions focusing on academic behaviors.
Skills such as perseverance, curiosity, conscientiousness, optimism, and self-control instill growth mindset and grit in students, allowing them to continue to try. These skills have more to do with character than with cognition and should be taught alongside daily curricular instruction (Tough, 2012).
Self-efficacy in the academic realm is the belief and confidence that one has in regard to his or her capacity to accomplish meaningful learning tasks and produce the desired results (Brozo & Flynn, 2008).
Perseverance refers to the tendency to pursue long-term goals with sustained effort and hard work. It has been shown to predict achievement in academic and vocational domains (Duckworth, Quinn, & Seligman, 2009; Duckworth & Quinn, 2009).
Executive function describes students’ ability to control their cognitive processes including planning, organizing, reasoning, and working memory. Students with strong executive function abilities are able to control the many different processes that lead to successful reading comprehension. Measures of executive function are highly correlated to measures of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and reading achievement (Miller et al., 2014).
Students who have an easier time learning to read tend to use metacognitive awareness as they are reading to think about what they are doing and to adjust the strategies they use accordingly. Some metacognitive strategies that foster reading growth include: setting goals while reading; regulating progress; and employing mastery-oriented strategies in order to reach comprehension goals (Molden & Dweck, 2006; Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995). These strategies assist struggling students in realizing that their reading abilities are fluid—not fixed. It encourages them to persist in the face of difficulty and avoid becoming convinced that they are “bad” readers.
While brief interventions can prove successful at helping students establish a growth mindset, more lasting change can be effected through daily activities that reinforce the importance of growth mindset. Schools and classrooms that reinforce growth mindset messaging place the focus on learning rather than performance and make learning more enjoyable for students (Yeager, Paunesku, Walton, & Dweck, 2013).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal develops academic mindset and behaviors as well as executive function, and encourages learning strategies critical for success in college and career. Building on existing structures that instill a sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and purpose, READ 180 Universal adds a focus on growth mindset. This focus helps to build students’ knowledge of growth mindset and increase their awareness of their own mindsets. READ 180 Universal also helps teachers internalize and operationalize growth mindset for themselves and their students. Additionally, the program supports students and teachers in making connections between their academic mindsets, behaviors, and performances over time.
Growth mindset is integrated into READ 180 Universal using five principles, which reach across program components (Whole- and Small-Group Learning, Student App, and Independent Reading):
During the first two weeks of READ 180 Universal, teachers and students begin to build their academic community with the Getting Started Workshop. In these lessons, students investigate what it means to have a growth mindset and experience how the brain changes with learning in an Anchor Video. They set goals for the school year and beyond and learn about other READ 180 students that struggled academically, but continued to work hard with effort and focus until they were able to achieve their goals. This Workshop helps students understand their own mindsets and how they can “build their brains” with positive learning behaviors. The concept of a fixed versus growth mindset is introduced from the very beginning of the year, so students and teachers have language to discuss mindset and behavior. They can work together to overcome challenges with effort and perseverance.
Throughout the course of READ 180 Universal, students cultivate a growth mindset by approaching learning tasks with perseverance. The gradual release approach used in all READ 180 Universal instruction ensures that students gain confidence as they move from full support to independent work, taking on increased responsibility for their own learning.
The READ 180 Universal Student App also reflects important principles of engagement and motivation—critical for struggling readers. Students can track their progress toward and mastery of reading skills through the Student Dashboard. Monitoring their progress will build students’ self-efficacy as they witness their growth and progress through READ 180 Universal. The Student Dashboard acts as a powerful motivator for students, as they are able to track their own progress, celebrate their achievements, and take ownership. By empowering students to drive their own learning, students will develop executive function skills that will serve them in the classroom and beyond.
The Student App provides patient encouragement to students, along with immediate individualized feedback that can be particularly beneficial to English learners and students with disabilities. Universal design principles in the technology bolster the confidence of English Learners (ELs) and students with disabilities. Additionally, first language support features augment the learning process for ELs. This access to information about their progress and achievements not only motivates students, but also builds their awareness of who they are as learners, and guides them in setting and working toward academic goals.
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the process by which students develop the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to understand and manage emotions, set and achieve goals, feel and show empathy for others, maintain positive relationships, and make responsible decisions (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, 2014).
Five of the SEL core competencies are self-awareness (the ability to accurately recognize one’s emotions and thoughts and their influence on behavior); self-regulation (managing one’s emotions, thoughts, and behaviors effectively in different situations); social awareness (taking the perspective of and empathizing with others from diverse backgrounds and cultures while recognizing social and ethical norms for behavior); relationship skills (establishing and maintaining healthy and rewarding relationships with diverse individuals and groups); and responsible decision making (making constructive and respectful choices about personal behavior and social interactions based on ethical standards and the well-being of self and others) (CASEL, 2014).
Some of the SEL factors that improve success in school include having self-discipline, motivating one’s self, managing stress, and organizing one’s approach to learning more (Duckworth & Seligman, 2005).
Self-regulation is another component of SEL that has been linked to academic achievement. Students who display this aspect of SEL try harder and have more persistence in the face of challenges (Aronson et al., 2002).
Three decades of research covered in a meta-analysis of 213 SEL programs found that SEL interventions increased students’ academic performance by 11 percentile points over students who did not participate in SEL programs. The SEL programs also reduced aggression and emotional distress, increased helping behaviors, and improved positive attitudes toward one’s self and others (Durlak et al., 2011).
Social and emotional learning in schools can be just as, if not even more, essential than academic learning for putting students on a path to positive developmental and life outcomes. A study conducted by the Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education at Columbia University’s Teachers College found that schools that invest in social-emotional learning programs experience a return on their investment of $11 for every dollar spent. In addition to improvements in grades, attendance, and performance in core subjects, other benefits from social-emotional learning programs include reductions in aggression, substance abuse, delinquency, depression, and anxiety (Belfield et al., 2015).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
The content organized within READ 180 Universal’s Knowledge Map reinforces and provides examples of the importance of managing emotions, setting and working to achieve goals, showing empathy for others, maintaining positive relationships, and making responsible decisions.
Within the Student Application (Student App) and Independent Reading, students read texts that inspire them to consider others through new perspectives. The messages and feedback delivered by the “Smart Coach” in Student App encourage students to persevere and achieve goals, make responsible decisions, regulate their thoughts and behaviors, manage stress, and organize their approach to learning.
The Student Dashboard within Student App allows students to set goals, regulate their progress, and motivate themselves toward achieving their goals.
The Independent Reading Library includes a number of titles that promote healthy social and emotional traits. The books help students build social awareness by encouraging them to feel and show empathy for others from diverse backgrounds and cultures. They also demonstrate positive relationship skills, such as seeking out healthy and rewarding relationships with diverse individuals and responsible decision making such as making constructive and respectful choices about actions and behavior.
During the Getting Started Workshop, completed during the first two weeks of the school year, students set goals for each of the READ 180 Universal rotations and learn tips to help them achieve those goals. These goals are revisited throughout the school year to help the students become self-motivated and self-regulated in achieving their goals. Students gain social awareness through reading stories and watching videos about other people who have faced and overcome challenges. The activities that students complete during this Workshop help them to become aware of their own thoughts and emotions and how they can control them to “do a 180,” rewrite their own stories, and put themselves on a path to college and career success.
To support students’ academic, behavioral, and social needs, many schools have adopted multi-tiered models of intervention. Because Tier 3 interventions are costly in terms of time and resources, schools must find efficient and effective Tier 2 interventions prior to providing such intense supports (Bruhn, Hirsch, Gorsh, & Hannan, 2014).
Utilizing a Multi-tiered System of Supports (MTSS) creates a coherent continuum of evidence-based, system-wide practices that support a rapid response to the academic and behavioral needs of students. Within MTSS, there is frequent data-based monitoring to inform instructional decision making so as to empower all students to achieve high standards (Kansas MTSS, 2008).
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a system that provides supports that increase in intensity, based on students’ behavioral and social needs. The purpose of PBIS is to take a proactive approach to addressing school discipline by promoting positive behaviors school-wide, identifying problem behaviors early, and responding to and reducing those behaviors through research-based instruction and intervention (Stewart et al., 2007). At each level, key components of the model include clearly defined expectations explicitly taught to all students, opportunities for students to practice the skills, reinforcement for students who meet expectations, and a system for monitoring student progress (Lane, Robertson, & Graham-Bailey, 2006; Sugai et al., 2000).
Schools that have a culture that includes PBIS are able to establish the behavioral supports that are needed for all children to achieve both social and academic success. These schools have demonstrated increased achievement on both academic and social measures (Cohen, Kincaid, & Childs, 2007).
Effective PBIS implementations can be found in schools and districts that:
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal can help educators meet the needs of students in both general education and special education through a Multi-Tiered System of Supports approach, which is a systematic framework for allocating instructional services and resources in response to students’ individual academic and behavioral needs. As illustrated in the figure below, MTSS employs a multi-tiered model of service delivery to promote efficient response to students’ needs. Each tier provides increasingly intensive support structure to ensure that students succeed.
The READ 180 Universal instructional model supports multiple tiers by balancing whole-group instruction with small-group instruction that is targeted to different skills based on students’ needs. During whole-group instruction, the teacher focuses on macro-level skills that all students need. Then, students break into small groups to address their individual needs through adaptive instructional software, leveled books, and small-group direct instruction in reading. While one small group works on the Topic Software that continuously assesses and provides targeted instruction, another group reads paperbacks and eReads independently at the appropriate reading level based on the Lexile Framework® for Reading. This instructional model allows teachers to work with a chosen small group to address individual needs based on assessment data.
The PBIS model, which is incorporated throughout READ 180 Universal, provides embedded supports and procedures for increasing student engagement, promoting positive behaviors, and motivating students to succeed. Instructional routines such as Oral Cloze, Think (Write)-Pair-Share, Idea Wave, numbered heads, and peer feedback encourage students to engage with the material with scaffolds that structure and support their responses. The instructional routines help to create a learning environment in which students can actively participate in a non-threatening and flexible way.
There has been a call for more instruction in higher-level reading skills for adolescents and for professional development for teachers due to the realities of student reading difficulties and teacher lack of preparedness. This has raised serious consideration around the support that needs to be given to struggling readers and the role that teachers play in working toward higher levels of literacy among students (Kamil, Borman, Dole, Kral, Salinger, Torgesen, 2008).
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi level system for maximizing student achievement by integrating ongoing assessment of student progress with increasingly intensive intervention (National Center on Response to Intervention, 2010). RTI organizes intervention into multiple tiers of support for students not making adequate progress (Feldman, 2009). In all tiers of intervention, students benefit from teachers’ use of data to determine whether students are making the desired academic gains, and then whether they need modifications in their curricula, materials, or instruction (Duffy, 2008; Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D., 2007).
The What Works Clearinghouse identified five recommendations to assist educators in providing appropriate instruction for struggling students: 1) Screen all students for potential reading problems at the beginning and middle of the year; 2) Provide time for differentiated reading instruction for all students based on assessments of students’ current reading level; 3) Provide intensive, systematic instruction on up to three foundational reading skills in small groups to students who score below the benchmark score on universal screening; 4) Monitor the progress of Tier 2 students at least once a month; and 5) Provide intensive instruction on a daily basis that promotes the development of the various components of reading proficiency to students who show minimal progress after reasonable time in Tier 2 small-group instruction (Gersten, Compton, Connor, Dimino, Santoro, Linan-Thompson, & Tilly, 2008).
Within the RTI framework, districts can assist students in transitioning to college-and career-ready standards. The focus of an RTI approach supports diverse learners in accessing and meeting rigorous state standards (McInterney & Elledge, 2013).
Parental involvement is an important part of the RTI model. Schools that implement RTI provide parents with information about their child’s progress, the instruction and interventions used, the teachers and staff who are providing the intervention, and the academic and/or behavioral goals for their child (National Center for Learning Disabilities, 2015).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal is a Tier 2 intervention that offers powerful tools for the systematic screening and progress monitoring that are central to an RTI approach, along with customizable training and professional development to ensure that teachers can use the program with a wide array of students.
The Reading Inventory serves as a screening assessment in the beginning of the year to determine students’ reading level and place them at the appropriate level in Student Application (Student App). The Reading Inventory can then be administered multiple times over the year as a progress-monitoring tool—an essential component of an RTI approach.
For additional progress monitoring, READ 180 Universal provides a variety of curriculum-embedded, criterion-referenced assessments, including passages for oral reading fluency assessment and Workshop Assessments, to regularly track student progress. Workshop Assessments are administered both in the middle of and after every ReaL Book Workshop to assess students’ mastery of comprehension and writing skills taught during Whole- and Small-Group Learning. These assessments can be used by teachers to inform future individual and Small-Group instruction.
In Student App, continuous targeted diagnostic assessments check for mastery of skills and identify individual instructional needs. The grouping tool on the Teacher Dashboard groups students according to their specific needs identified through ongoing assessment, allowing teachers to easily and efficiently plan differentiated instruction and intervention.
READ 180 offers a wealth of resources for differentiating and adapting instruction based on students’ needs. Student App provides individualized instruction, along with immediate personalized feedback accompanied by modeling and guided practice. By constantly collecting ongoing data about student performance, Student App provides critical information for teachers about student progress and individual needs. The Teacher Dashboard then allows teachers to efficiently group students according to their needs for targeted follow-up instruction, while the Student Dashboard encourages students to take ownership over their own learning.
From its inception, READ 180 Universal was designed to address the needs of struggling readers. The research behind the development of READ 180’s innovative software was initially funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education. Through adaptive technology, individualized instruction, and high-interest materials, READ 180’s comprehensive program provides the direct, systematic instruction necessary to effectively support struggling readers. The program also offers motivational support that improves student confidence and attitudes toward reading and school.
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-level system for maximizing student achievement by integrating ongoing assessment of student progress with increasingly intensive intervention (National Center on Response to Intervention, 2010). RTI organizes intervention into multiple tiers of increasingly intense interventions for those students not making adequate progress in Tier 1 (Feldman, 2009). Tier 2 and 3 interventions are intensified by increasing instructional time, decreasing group size, matching materials to students’ levels, modifying presentation modes, and providing corrective feedback.
RTI supports progress monitoring for all students. In all tiers of intervention, students benefit from teachers’ use of data to determine whether students are making the desired academic gains, and then whether they need modifications in their curricula, materials, or instruction (Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D., 2007; Duffy, 2008).
Collecting ongoing data on student progress is vital to documenting student growth, planning instruction, and determining the need for intervention (Fisher & Ivey, 2006; National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2008; Stecker, Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D., 2005; Torgesen, 2002). Streamlining the regular collection and examination of data, as well as modifying instruction based on what is learned from student data, can benefit all students and can be a powerful tool to help make a teacher’s job more efficient rather than more difficult (Duffy, 2008).
For students with disabilities, it is particularly important to use student performance assessment data to monitor progress in order to determine continuing instructional/remedial needs (National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 2008).
Differentiated instruction meets students where they are—matching instruction to meet their assessed needs. Research demonstrates that differentiated instruction can significantly improve student achievement (Allan & Goddard, 2010). For students with disabilities, individually targeted instruction in reading skills can improve reading achievement, both in the targeted skill and in more generalized measures of literacy (Shanahan, 2008; Vaughn & Denton, 2008).
In a recent research synthesis by Wanzek and colleagues, strong evidence was found to support three instructional recommendations for students with reading difficulties in Grades 4 to 12: 1) Provide explicit vocabulary instruction; 2) Use direct and explicit comprehension strategy instruction; and 3) Provide struggling readers with intensive and individualized interventions. From this finding, the authors recommended intensive intervention efforts for students with reading difficulties in Grades 4 through 12 who do not perform at or near grade level, and supplemental, small-group instruction for extended periods of time (Wanzek, Vaughn, Scammacca, Metz, Murray, Roberts, & Danielson, 2013).
Teachers who rely mostly on whole-group instruction do not adequately meet the individual needs of students who need extra literacy support. Instead, teachers can use performance data to form small groups of students and teach lessons to target their specific skill needs. Students with disabilities particularly benefit from this type of targeted intensive instruction in small and flexible groups (Avalos, 2006).
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) models provide clearly defined expectations explicitly taught to all students, opportunity for students to practice the skills, reinforcement for students who meet expectations, and a system for monitoring student progress (Lane, Robertson, & Graham-Bailey, 2006; Sugai & Horner, 2002). PBIS models have been found to be particularly effective in helping students with emotional and behavioral challenges stay on track and experience success (Sugai, Sprague, & Horner, 1999).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal can help educators meet the needs of students with disabilities through a Response to Intervention (RTI) approach, which is a systematic framework for allocating instructional services and resources in response to students’ individual needs. An RTI framework employs a multi-tiered model of service delivery to promote efficient response to students’ needs. Each tier provides increasingly intensive support structure to ensure that students succeed.
The READ 180 Universal instructional model supports multiple tiers by balancing whole-group instruction with small-group instruction that is targeted to different skills based on students’ needs. During whole-group instruction, the teacher focuses on macro-level skills that all students need. Then, students break into small groups to address their individual needs through adaptive instructional Software, leveled books, and small-group direct instruction in reading, writing, language development, and comprehension. While one small group works on the Topic Software that continuously assesses and provides targeted instruction, another group reads paperbacks, eReads, eBooks, and listens to audio books independently at the appropriate reading level based on the Lexile Framework for Reading. This instructional model allows teachers to group students to address individual needs based on assessment data.
The READ 180 Universal software offers powerful tools for the systematic screening and progress monitoring that are central to an RTI approach, along with customizable training and professional development to ensure that teachers can use the program with a wide array of students, including students with disabilities.
Independent Reading eBooks and eReads provide numerous supports to help students with disabilities as they read independently. Those supports include a text-to-speech feature, a zoom feature, a digital dictionary, and a highlighting feature. In addition, Audiobooks feature a reading coach, a narrator who provides comprehension strategies and models fluent reading respectively. During Independent Reading, students may also express their learning through book conferences with the teacher, and collaboration and presentation projects.
Following a Multi-tiered System of Supports (MTSS) model, Positive Behavioral Intervention and Supports (PBIS) and RTI are integrated throughout READ 180 Universal to provide embedded procedures for increasing student engagement, promoting positive behaviors, and motivating students to succeed. Instructional routines such as Oral Cloze, Think (Write)-Pair-Share, and peer feedback encourage students to engage with the material with scaffolds that structure and support their responses. The instructional routines help to create a learning environment in which students can actively participate in a non threatening and flexible way.
The number of English learners in schools has grown by over 50% in the past decade. Current estimations of English learners in schools are 5.3 million students, a significant amount. While this has brought challenges to meeting the needs of these students, it has also brought an opportunity to embrace multicultural and multilingual education and an increased focus on improving instruction for English learners (George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education, 2009).
The proportion of English learners that live in California is approximately 34% of the national total, and California has more English learners than the next six states combined. Approximately 25% of California’s students are English learners. English learners must meet the same challenging standards as native speakers of English, and many are at risk in US schools, which typically do not successfully differentiate instruction to meet their unique and varied needs (California Department of Education, 2010).
A recent review of best practices for “Teaching Academic Content and Literacy to English Learners in Elementary and Middle School” conducted by the Institute of Education Sciences resulted in four recommendations:
The research on effective instruction for English learners points to three important principles: generally effective practices are likely to be effective with English learners; English learners require additional instructional supports; and the home language can be used to promote academic development. Additionally, English learners need plenty of opportunities to develop proficiency in English (Goldenberg, 2013).
In a study of high-performing schools with large populations of English learners, four broad, effective practices were identified as having the most significant positive correlation with high test scores: implementing a coherent, standards-based curriculum and instructional program; prioritizing student achievement; ensuring availability of instructional resources; and using assessment data to improve student achievement and instruction (Williams, Hakuta, Haertel et al., 2007).
For mixed-ability classes including English learners, providing explicit, interactive instruction results in the greatest text comprehension gains, especially when the instruction relates the academic vocabulary words in the text to focal lesson concepts or when the words have general use in academic contexts (Kinsella, 2013).
Students need to be reading not only deeply but widely and building their vocabulary and knowledge (Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2002; Feldman & Kinsella, 2005). Wide reading is particularly important for English learners, who benefit from learning word meanings in context rather than as separate lists of words (Au, 1993).
Because academic language proficiency is related to achievement in reading and writing, direct instruction in oral and written academic language for English learners is critical (Biancarosa & Snow, 2004; Gersten & Baker, 2000). For example, teaching vocabulary and grammar as it is used in specific genres prepares English learners to succeed with academic writing tasks (Schleppegrell, 1998).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
In a sense, all students are English learners, as they all come to school with different experiences and levels of exposure to the English language. READ 180 Universal is designed to differentiate instruction and meet all English learners at their levels, whether they are speakers of other languages or other dialects such as nonstandard English, while being respectful of their first language. READ 180 Universal helps teachers to capitalize on the advantages that English learners bring to the classroom and the support that using their first language judiciously can provide. By focusing on understanding register and academic language, the program helps students build upon their native languages and dialects and provides them the scaffolding and supports they need to “put miles on the tongue” and use academic language effectively.
Throughout READ 180 Universal, program materials reflect a consideration for the needs of English learners. The program was designed with the recognition that focusing on the needs of English learners highlights important elements of reading instruction, such as building background knowledge and developing academic vocabulary, that are beneficial to all READ 180 Universal users.
READ 180 Universal includes many supports that are beneficial to English learners who are struggling with reading comprehension and fluency. All English learners can benefit from the individualized instruction provided by Individualized Learning Technology, along with immediate corrective feedback that has been found to be particularly helpful to non-native English speakers. Student Application (Student App) also provides vocabulary supports, captioning of Anchor Videos, supports in the eReads and parent materials for five major world languages spoken in California (Spanish, Vietnamese, Filipino, Cantonese, and Mandarin), and Spanish translations that can help students with beginning and intermediate English proficiency levels access the texts, build background knowledge, and experience success.
The program’s emphasis on developing academic language and vocabulary reflects practices that have been shown to be particularly effective for English learners, who may struggle with academic language even if they are comfortable with conversational English. Similarly, English learners benefit from supported practice with speaking and listening in the classroom and opportunities to collaborate and discuss concepts with peers. The program’s instructional routines, such as Think (Write)-Pair-Share, scaffold classroom discussion so that English learners can feel more comfortable participating. Like native English speakers, English learners are able to apply and practice their learned skills with Audiobooks and independent reading books that are leveled so that students can experience frequent success with reading. In addition, students have the opportunity to practice their oral language skills during independent reading book conferences and collaboration and presentation projects. Projects are assigned at the teacher’s direction and may include debates, research projects, multimedia presentations, choral reading, writing dialogue, and more. The multicultural content found across all components of READ 180 Universal reflects ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity, helping English learners find a sense of belonging in their new culturally responsive environment.
In order for a child to be successful in school, there are numerous critical roles that families play: supporters of learning, encouragers of perseverance and determination, models of educational practices, and advocates of appropriate school environments for their child. Families need the opportunity to learn and grow along with their children and support the learning and growth of their children in order for partnerships between families and schools to succeed (Mapp & Kuttner, 2014).
Schools and districts that successfully engage families in their children’s learning are able to strike a balance between pushing families to support learning and pulling the families into the school community. These schools view families as partners in their children’s education and provide a collaborative environment that builds relationships between educators and families. They have frameworks that encourage both learning at home and collaborative decision making (Henderson, Mapp, Johnson, & Davies, 2007).
Having books in the home helps establish a reading culture that continues from generation to generation within families and is independent of education and class. This creates an interest in and desire for books that will promote the skills and knowledge needed to foster both literacy and numeracy, thus leading to lifelong academic advantages (Evans et al., 2010).
Children whose parents have lots of books are nearly 20% more likely to finish college. Books in the home are a stronger predictor of college graduation than the educational levels of the parents (Evans et al., 2010).
It is very important that families and educators make a firm commitment to encourage adolescent students to read outside of school by finding ways to engage them with texts over the summer, as well as before and after school. Moreover, it is critical that we encourage them to make reading a part of their lifestyle (Alexander, 2014).
For a child to become a reader, time spent with parents or caregivers who engage with their children with books—whether through close readings or discussion of pictures—is what is most necessary. When children not only have access to books but can also share them with reading mentors who love books and reading, they are much more likely to thrive as readers (Heath, 1983; Bridges, 2014).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal provides resources to help families support students’ learning and connect with the READ 180 Universal classroom. Families and caregivers can go online to the Family Portal to learn about READ 180 Universal instruction and materials. The site includes a video, 60 Seconds to School Success, providing tips for families about how to support their children’s literacy achievement, and offers links to additional resources and research to help caregivers understand the needs of struggling readers. In addition, the Family Portal provides a space for sharing success stories and experiences with teachers and other READ 180 Universal families.
Each ReaL Book Workshop includes four or five strategies to support teachers in involving and engaging parents, including:
These strategies are available in the Teacher’s Edition throughout the texts and during process writing instruction. Parent reports of student progress as well as letters to parents are available in multiple languages. Access to digital books helps students engage with their families over texts.
CONNECTED PROFESSIONAL LEARNING. Long-term connected professional learning includes cohesive features—online coaching, remote peer observations, online collaboration, and facilitated online communities—all with a focus on how to ensure social and emotional well- being and meaningful student learning in digital environments. Connecting workshops to follow-up learning and support among peers and with coaches can help teachers retain new knowledge, practice new skills, and share innovative effective approaches so they can scale. A connection between workshops, coaching, and collaboration is essential for a professional learning program to make a difference in student achievement (Aguilar, 2019).
Effective professional learning, whether in-person, online, or blended, is a “series of connected, coordinated components on a continuum” (Rock, 2011). This continuum includes alignment between the study of theory and practice, observation of theory and practice, individual coaching, and further practice and refinement through collaboration.
PERSONALIZATION. Personalized professional development (PD) allows teachers to pursue learning to support their instructional needs in their own place and at their own pace. Teachers can take courses via online professional learning portals, opportunities offered by the school, or off-campus settings. Teachers learn new competencies, demonstrate what they have learned in their classrooms, and submit evidence of mastery for assessment. As teachers build their knowledge and skills, they earn badges to demonstrate their expertise (Clayton, Elliot, & Iwata, 2014).
COACHING. Research has demonstrated that sustained, job-embedded coaching is the most effective form of professional learning, whether it is delivered in person or in a virtual setting. Coaching delivered in person has been most effective when coaches are highly expert and focus their work with teachers on a clearly specified instructional model or program. A recent meta-analysis of coaching programs identified several aspects of coaching in a virtual setting as potential strengths: increasing the number of teachers with whom a high-quality coach can work, reducing educators’ concern about being evaluated by their coach, and lowering costs while increasing scalability (Kraft et al., 2018). The evidence to date, however, suggests that the medium through which coaching is delivered is less important than the quality and substance of the learning opportunities provided to teachers (Matsumura et al., 2019). Any coaching relationship—traditional or virtual—builds on the qualities of both teacher and coach, including a willingness to change, a trusting relationship, a high level of initiative, and a commitment to the workplace (Blackman, 2010).
COLLABORATION. Online professional development can help solve resource challenges in implementing a scalable and sustainable model. Online PD platforms can create a peer-to-peer support community, building the capacity of the teaching team to support each other. Perhaps most importantly, online PD allows teachers to experience the agency and personalized learning they are creating for students. The unique opportunity of blended PD is the shift from PD as a one-time or periodic event to PD as an ongoing and embedded practice (Tucker & Wycoff, 2019).
Online collaboration as a component of a connected professional learning program serves four primary purposes: 1) engaging in collective inquiry, which involves shared reflection on and focused investigation of the problems that emerge when putting newly learned content or pedagogy into practice; 2) improving content and pedagogical practices through study, observation, and discussion; 3) promoting a culture of collaboration that allows the transmission of content and pedagogy and a shared responsibility for teaching and learning; and 4) connecting the content and pedagogy learned in webinars and workshops and practiced in coaching to ensure that it is demonstrated and sustained in improved instructional practices (Rock, 2011).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
HMH provides a continuum of connected professional learning through implementation planning and synchronous and asynchronous support to ensure that teachers and students are supported throughout the year. The program’s embedded and on-demand support coupled with professional learning and coaching fosters teachers’ agency, promotes collaboration, and builds collective efficacy to support teachers’ roles as designers of quality instruction.
To support the sustainability of READ 180 and to ensure optimal implementation of the program across all schools, HMH collaborates with District leadership to create an implementation plan. Planning meetings at mid-year and end-of-year provide an opportunity to review growth and keep the implementation on track. An HMH Professional Learning Consultant works with teachers and leaders to analyze core reports from the management system to target individual students’ needs and identify next steps for instruction, monitoring, and assessment based on report data.
The Getting Started with READ 180 live online session is an important part of the learning journey. We know teachers can’t take in every detail before they start teaching READ 180, so the Getting Started with READ 180 live online session is streamlined to focus on preparing teachers for the first three weeks of implementation. The live online experience provides an overview of the research-based components of the program and how they work to accelerate reading achievement and build literacy. Teachers have opportunities to explore, collaborate, and asks questions to build understanding and confidence to prepare them for a strong start. Additionally, the Leadership Getting Started live online session provides leaders with the knowledge, strategies, and tools they need to support teachers in successfully implementing READ 180 Universal.
Follow-Up sessions build on the Getting Started with READ 180 to deepen program confidence and mastery. These personalized sessions focus on supporting key literacy intervention topics and utilizing the program’s digital tools and resource.
For some things, just-in-time help can be more effective than schedules events. HMH Teacher Central, an online experience, provides teachers with digital teaching, lesson planning, professional learning, progress monitoring tools, and support resources in a centralized location. The HMH Teacher Central Resource Library contains downloadable resources for lessons and professional learning, sorted by category.
HMH recognizes that professional growth occurs through a sustained learning process in which the personal needs of each participant are systematically and strategically elevated and supported. HMH offers blended coaching which provides personalized support focused on lesson design, instructional practices, content, and data-driven decision-making to ensure continuous improvement over time. HMH coaches build strong relationships with teachers by modeling high-impact instructional strategies, answering program and practice questions, leading grade-level program sessions centered on evidence of student learning and helping teachers select, monitor, and achieve goals. By incorporating action steps, gathering data, and analyzing evidence and reflecting, coaching can facilitate measurable results (Taylor & Chanter, 2016).
The program’s comprehensive blended professional learning solutions are research based, mapped to a teacher’s goals, centered on his/her students, and designed to build the collective capacity and efficacy of leaders and teachers. Collective efficacy within a system has this power to changes lives.
READ 180 builds a culture of professional growth through:
Well-designed blended learning solutions offer many positive benefits for students, especially for struggling students. Five aspects of technology that can be game changers for students are that it is:
Adaptive technology harnesses Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles in that it provides a flexible design from the start that has customizable options. This flexibility allows all learners to progress from where they are and not where we would have imagined them to be. In this way, all learners are provided with instruction that is varied and robust enough to be effective (CAST, 2011).
The motivating potential of technology, especially for struggling students, is very promising. For almost everyone, especially students caught in a cycle of failure, success is a tremendous motivator. Many technology-based programs are able to process data and point out improvements in even very small increments. Seeing these improvements is incredibly motivating for students who feel they have never experienced success in school (Hasselbring & Bausch, 2005).
Adaptive technology affords students the opportunity to receive individualized support, learn at their own pace, and receive corrective feedback in real time (Kamil, 2003). Individually targeted instruction in reading skills can improve reading achievement, both in the targeted skill and in more generalized measures of literacy (Shanahan, 2008; Vaughn & Denton, 2008).
Many technology-based programs allow teachers to look up the day-to-day progress of students, see which concepts are holding them back, and then use that information to create an individualized learning plan. When a student spends just a small amount of time using the right kind of software, technology-based programs can quickly assess the student’s skill set, organize the data, and deliver customized data to the teacher, parent, or student (Hasselbring, 2010). A recent report (RAND, 2014) found that students in charter schools that had implemented personalized learning programs improved in reading and math over the national average on standardized tests.
A recent report from the Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education (SCOPE) cited three factors that affect the achievement of at-risk adolescent students that use educational technology: the interactive nature of the technology, the ability of the technology to encourage students to explore and create rather than repetitively practice skills, and effective interaction between teachers and the technology (Darling-Hammond, Zielezinski, & Goldman, 2014).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal’s innovative technology harnesses learning theory and pedagogical principles to deliver individualized and personalized instruction tailored to each student’s needs and interests. The adaptive technology embedded into the Student Application (Student App) customizes and scaffolds individual practice and application of word recognition, spelling, vocabulary, language, fluency, comprehension, and writing skills. The adaptive pacing of skills practice in the Student App helps students achieve automaticity, freeing cognitive capacity for higher-order processes. In addition, embedded assessments throughout the Student App are designed to continuously assess and place students according to their levels of mastery of learned and new information, and to customize corrective feedback to students’ specific errors.
The power of READ 180 Universal’s technology is that it enables the program to assess student knowledge and skills, respond to individual student differences, differentiate and scaffold instruction, provide corrective feedback, monitor student progress, and offer teachers data to guide students to become proficient readers and learners. These characteristics constitute instructional practices that have been shown to be highly beneficial to struggling readers, students with disabilities, and English learners.
READ 180 Universal builds a Learner Profile that takes into consideration the students’ mastery of academic skills (measured through their performance on reading comprehension, fluency, word recognition, language/vocabulary, spelling, and writing activities) as well as their academic mindset (measured through their usage and activity in the Student App and help-seeking and challenge-seeking behaviors). The Learner Profile is informed by the FASTT algorithm to consistently provide students with instruction and practice on skills and strategies within their zone of proximal development. In addition, advances in speech recognition technology enable the Student App to monitor their behaviors and provide feedback to ensure that students stay on task.
Blended learning can be described both as a formal education program in which a student learns through online delivery of content and instruction while having some control over time, place, path, and/or pace, and as a supervised education program that occurs in a “brick-and-mortar” location (Staker & Horn, 2012).
Providing a fundamental redesign of instructional models, blended learning seeks to accelerate learning toward college and career readiness. The goal is to develop schools that are more productive for both students and teachers by personalizing instruction. In this way, blended learning can ensure that the most appropriate resources and interventions are available for students at the time that they need them (Bailey, Ellis, Schneider, & Vander Ark, 2013).
Blended learning has the potential to bring accessibility, affordability, and customization that might have previously been complicated, expensive, and standardized to educational places. In this way, it can transform learning experiences for students (Staker et al., 2011).
Blended learning that integrates face-to-face and digital learning can lead to greater educational equity, opportunities, and efficiencies for students. As we use technology and digital devices regularly in order to function in our personal and professional lives, it is reasonable to integrate these same resources into educational environments (Anderson & Skrzypchak, 2011).
Models of blended learning that follow a hybrid pattern build upon and offer sustaining enhancements to a regular classroom system while not disrupting it. Other models of blended learning that are more disruptive can transform the classroom system by becoming engines of change over the longer term (Horn & Staker, 2014).
In a membership survey of teachers from all fifty states, the Association of American Educators found that 92% of teachers report utilizing technology in the classroom and 68% of teachers “support a blended learning environment where students spend part of their day with a teacher and part of their day working with a computer” (Association of American Educators, 2015).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
HMH has embraced a blended learning approach to instruction since the first version of READ 180 integrated technology was introduced in primary and secondary classrooms to support teachers’ efforts to provide individualized, personalized, and differentiated instruction. As Margery Mayer, former president of HMH Intervention Solutions Group, has said: “Everyone is in the blended learning space now, but back then we just felt that ‘blended’ was the most natural way to learn—technology to help and support where it makes sense. And it steps back and lets the teacher do what he or she does best as well.”
All READ 180 Universal teachers have access to HMH Teacher Central, which provides unprecedented support for monitoring learning and differentiating instruction—critical to effective intervention. Through HMH Teacher Central, the teacher can:
READ 180 Universal Student Application (Student App) complements the teacher-led Whole- and Small-Group Learning with activities that customize and scaffold individual skill practice. Students are able to choose their path through the Student App and work at their own pace, two factors that are critical to an effective blended learning program. Student App also continuously collects data about student performance and provides continual personalized feedback to the student, freeing the teacher to focus on targeted direct instruction for the Whole-Group and Small-Group Learning.
Other features of READ 180 Universal technology also help teachers collect and manage data, providing them more time for face-to-face teaching. For example, the adaptive The Reading Inventory assessment screens students and provides a Lexile measure that teachers can use to efficiently match students with texts. This data not only provides a personalized path through the Student App, but also allows the teacher to differentiate instruction during Small-Group Learning.
As technological and learning advances are increasingly being made, we are at the beginning of what is surely to be the most important, turbulent, and exciting decade in the century for innovations in assessment. Four major forces are pushing these innovations along: technological, social, and economic trends are changing the skills needed for citizenship and employment; the power of personal digital and computing devices and the number of people with daily access to them are increasing exponentially; cognitive science is creating new and powerful insights into how people learn; and the demand for K–12 education learning and assessment tools in the United States is reaching explosive levels that will spur greater investment and innovation (Doorey, 2012).
Effective assessments allow educators to make important claims about the knowledge and skills that students possess. Literacy assessments can enable educators to determine whether students can read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts, to determine whether they can write effectively when analyzing text, and to determine their overall literacy proficiency (Gendron, 2012).
Assessment systems can provide a balanced way to give teachers and schools the information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning so that all students leave high school ready for college and career. Balanced assessment systems include formative assessment practices that improve instruction; interim assessments that are flexible and open and are used for actionable feedback; and summative assessments that are benchmarked to college and career readiness (Gendron, 2012).
Shepherd and Marzola (2011) found that teachers who incorporated formative assessments into their lessons increased student reading achievement scores more than teachers who did not use formative assessments. Chatterji, Koh, Choi, and Iyengar (2009) also found that their researcher-developed formative assessment, the Proximal Assessment for Learner Diagnosis (PALD), was effective for addressing learner needs and thus closing achievement gaps in subject-area domains.
While formative assessments are beneficial for all students, they are particularly helpful for struggling students as they highlight troublesome areas and provide guidance on what needs to be done to overcome them (Black & William, 2009).
Schools that embrace a student-centered learning approach emphasize instruction and assessment that help students connect with and apply what they are learning through culminating performance-based assessments. These schools utilize ongoing, performance-based assessments that focus on mastery. Student-centered schools are more likely to outperform peers on standardized assessments, graduate more students, help more students become eligible for college, and have students that persist in college (Friedlaender et al., 2014).
How READ 180 Universal Delivers
READ 180 Universal contains a comprehensive system to administer and give actionable feedback for both formative assessments (assessments for learning) and summative assessments (assessments of learning). The READ 180 Universal assessment system provides ongoing information for students, teachers, and administrators throughout the year about student learning and progress.
READ 180 Universal assessments include tools to screen and place students, monitor progress, and provide information that can be used to inform instruction. READ 180 Universal teachers use The Reading Inventory, a scientifically based and validated test, as a screening assessment in the beginning of the year and as a progress-monitoring assessment in the middle and end of the year. The Reading Inventory Lexile measure is one of several data points that are used to inform the students’ learner profiles. Other contributions to the learner profile include the students’ interests, their engagement and motivation that are tracked through the Student Application (Student App), and their performance on the Workshop assessments, on HMH Reading Counts! independent reading quizzes, and in the Student App.
In addition to The Reading Inventory, READ 180 Universal includes multiple formal and informal formative assessments to monitor student progress on an ongoing basis. Students can take Interim and End-of-Workshop Assessments during and after each of six Workshops to assess progress in using reading strategies for comprehension. These embedded assessments are designed to monitor progress and support instruction, and are aligned to core Reading and Language Arts Content Standards. The tests include item formats that students will encounter on Next Generation assessments so that students will develop strategies for attacking these challenging formats and practice the kinds of thinking these items demand. Students may also take Summative Tests at midyear and end of year to assess listening and reading comprehension, critical reading, word-study skills, conventions, and writing. HMH Reading Counts! quizzes assess students’ comprehension of Paperbacks, Audiobooks, and eReads that they complete during Independent Reading.
HMH Teacher Central provides a step-by-step process for formative assessments to take place during Small-Group Learning. This process makes it easy for teachers to quickly and effectively evaluate students and then review the data to inform their instruction. The process includes the following: teacher and tool activities alerting teachers to the lesson’s goals, guiding students through the response activity that measures their performance, examining the Formative Assessment rubric, determining the mastery level of each student, giving options to adapt instruction, and quickly logging student performance level (There, Nearly There, Not Yet) with the formative assessment tracker.
Critical thinking and 21st century skills are assessed at the end of every Workshop, through Projects that assess students’ abilities to apply 21st century skills such as analyzing information, using technology for communication, and engaging in collaborative work. Scoring guides are used to assess these projects, as well as writing assignments and the Respond & Write activities in the Writing Zone. These scoring guides support students and teachers in reviewing students’ work, providing feedback, and revising as necessary.
Technology plays an important role in the READ 180 Universal assessment system. READ 180 Universal’s adaptive technology provides students with personalized feedback and teachers with a powerful tool for progress monitoring as it continuously collects data on students’ growth and mastery of new skills that feeds into the students’ learner profiles. The Teacher and Leadership Dashboards provide easy access to data from these ongoing assessments, allowing teachers and administrators to efficiently monitor student progress in real time, quickly identify problems, and inform decision making about instruction.
All READ 180 Universal students complete interim- and end-of-year performance assessments that take place after Workshop 3 and Workshop 6. These performance assessments are research projects in which the students choose a topic, research and evaluate sources, and use the process and strategies they have learned for informative writing to write a research paper.
The new READ 180 Universal embodies the evidence base and efficacy of reading research as well as the experience and best practices of educators. The development of this newest edition of READ 180 is grounded in the renowned research of READ 180 authors and partners, and in an extensive understanding of the field of reading research. As the evidence base on what makes a successful blended learning instructional program has grown since READ 180’s beginning in 1999, we have continually sought to improve our program to reflect the most current knowledge available on accelerating the learning of all students.
As demonstrated in this paper, the specific elements that were added to READ 180 Universal include an array of enhancements informing an educative curriculum for teachers as well as an increased focus on the neurological underpinnings of reading for all students, especially those who are struggling learners. The new program components enable teachers to continuously improve their instruction, provide more opportunities for students to read independently and listen to read alouds, realize the important role of mindset and self-efficacy as well as social-emotional learning, and enhance personalized instruction for all students. The evidence base and the results of the efficacy studies detailed in this paper have been the driving forces behind improving this newest edition of READ 180. As such, the program includes further-enhanced reading instruction that is designed to activate the entire brain. With instruction powered by System 44, READ 180 Universal gives students the foundational skills they need to read complex texts. An increased focus on writing helps students plan, organize, and write across genres in the service of reading. READ 180 Universal gives greater attention to the importance of independent reading and read alouds to make sure students increase their background knowledge and stay engaged and motivated.
With new resources to ensure that all students have a growth mindset, READ 180 Universal encourages all students to persevere through challenges and obstacles. The Student Application (Student App) in READ 180 Universal has been designed to meet the needs of all students across the constructs of reading in order to give them instruction and practice in the areas that they need, while building on their strengths.
In short, READ 180 Universal has made improvements to make it easier for teachers to do what they do best: change students’ lives through instruction. We feel confident that these elements will make this edition of READ 180 the best yet.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adams, M. J. (2009). The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 163–189). New York: Guilford.
Adams, M. J. (2011). Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex texts. American Educator, Winter 2010–2011, 3–11.
Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Resolving the “great debate.” American Educator, 19(2), 10–20.
Aguilar, E. (2019). You can’t have a coaching culture without a structure. Educational Leadership: A Culture of Coaching, 77(3), 22-28.
Alexander, F. (2014), Quoted in Williams, M. “Major Drop in Teens and Reading.” Washington, DC: The Washington Post.
Allan, S.D. & Goddard, Y.L. (2010). Differentiated Instruction and RTI: A Natural Fit. Educational Leadership 68(2).
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2015). Helping your child learn to read. Retrieved from http://littoolkit.aap.org/Pages/home.aspx
Anderson, A., & Skrzypchak, A. (2011). Blended learning: The best of both worlds. Retrieved from http://www.dkfoundation.org/reports.asp
Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K–12 English language learners. Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.
Association of American Educators. (2015). Reform matters. Retrieved from http://www.aaeteachers.org/index.php/blog/1456-reform-matters-march-12th-2015
Au, K. (1993). Literacy instruction in multicultural settings. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
Avalos, M. A. (2006). No two learners are alike: Learners with linguistic and cultural differences. In J. S. Schumm (Ed.), Reading assessment and instruction for all learners (pp. 59–86). New York: Guilford.
Bailey, J., Ellis, S., Schneider, C., & Vander Ark, K. (2013). Blended Learning Implementation Guide, Version 1.0. Digital Learning Now.
Baker, S., Lesaux, N., Jayanthi, M., Dimino, J., Proctor, C. P., Morris, J., Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Kieffer, M. J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Teaching academic content and literacy to English learners in elementary and middle school (NCEE 2014-4012). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Barab, S.A., Barnett, M., Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489–542.
Baumann, J. F., Kame’enui, E. J., & Ash, G. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 752–785). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
Belfield, C., Bowden, B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies in Education at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/s/Belfield-et-al-The-Economics-of-SEL-Feb-2015.pdf
Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. S. (2014). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 2012, 139–160.
Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., Shilton, H., Shahaf-Barzilay, R. (2009). Cycles of inquiry: Formative assessment in service of learning in classrooms and in school-based professional communities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(4), 130–149.
Birsh, J. R. (Ed). (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(5), 5–31.
Blackman, A. (2010). Coaching as a leadership development tool for teachers. Professional Development in Education, 36(3), 421–441.
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded Edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Bridges, L. (2014). The joy and power of reading. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Brozo, W., & Flynn, E. S. (2008). Motivating students to read in the content classroom: Six evidence-based principles. The Reading Teacher, 62(2), 172–174.
Bruhn, A. L., Lane, K. L., & Hirsch, S. E. (2013). A review of tier 2 interventions conducted within multi-tiered models of behavioral prevention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(3), 171–189
Bruhn, A. L., Hirsch, S. E., Gorsh, J., & Hannan, C. (2014). Simple strategies for reflecting on and responding to common criticisms of PBIS. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 27(1), 13–25.
California Department of Education. (2010). World language content standards for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/worldlanguage2009.pdf
California Department of Education. (2012). Overview of the California English language development standards and proficiency level descriptors. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/el/er/documents/sbeoverviewpld.pdf
California Department of Education. (2014). The English language arts/English language development (ELA/ELD) framework for California public schools. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/rl/cf/elaeldfrmwrkbeadopted.asp
Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. (2010). Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2011). What is universal design for learning? Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/research/udl
Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). Poor children’s fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27(1), 14–15, 44.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chatterji, M., Koh, N., Choi, L., & Iyengar, R. (2009). Closing learning gaps proximally with teacher-mediated diagnostic classroom assessment. Research in the Schools, 16(2), 59–75.
Christensen, C., Horn, M., & Johnson, C. (2011). Disrupting class, (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clayton, J., Elliott, R., & Iwata, J. (2014). Exploring the use of micro-credentialing and digital badges in learning environments to encourage motivation to learn and achieve. Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology, Dunedin, New Zealand, 23-26 November, 2014.
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324, 400–403.
Cohen, R., Kincaid, D., & Childs, K. E. (2007). Measuring school-wide positive behavior support implementation: Development and validation of the Benchmarks of Quality. Journal of Positive Behavior Support, 9, 203–213.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2013). The CASEL Guide. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/guide/
Cunningham, A., & Rose, D. (2013). This is your brain on reading. Education Week, 32(15), 20–21.
Cunningham, A., & Zibulsky, J. (2013). Book smart: How to develop and support successful, motivated readers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=11566
Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). Effective teaching as a civil right: How building instructional capacity can help close the achievement gap. Annenberg Institute for School Reform: Voices in Urban Education, 31, 44–56.
Darling-Hammond, L., Zielezinski, M. B., & Goldman, S. (2014). Using technology to support at-risk students’ learning. Retrieved from https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/scope-pub-using-technology-report.pdf
Davis, D. S., & Neitzel, C. (2012). Collaborative sense-making in print and digital text environments. Reading and Writing, 25, 831–856.
Doorey, N. A. (2012). The light ahead. Center for k–12 assessment and performance management at ETS.
Duckworth, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. American Psychological Society, 16(12), 939–944.
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540–547.
Duffy, H. (2008). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school: A look at approaches to tiered intervention. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Duke, N., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.
Dutro, S., and Kinsella, K. (2010). English language development: Issues and implementation at grades six through twelve. In Improving education for English learners: Research-based approaches (pp. 151–207). Sacramento, CA: CDE Press.
Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Balantine Books.
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., and Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528.
Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., Dikora, J., & Treiman, D. J. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 171–197.
Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Feldman, K., & Kinsella, K. (2008). Narrowing the language gap: The case for explicit vocabulary instruction in secondary classrooms. In L. Denti & G. Guerin (Eds.), Effective practices for adolescents with reading and literacy challenges (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
Feldman, K., & Kinsella, K. (2005). Narrowing the language gap: The case for explicit vocabulary instruction. New York: Scholastic.
Feldman, K. (2009). Response to intervention (RTI) and older struggling readers: Special education reform as part of meaningful school improvement. Presented at 2009 READ 180 National Summer Institute.
Fillmore, L. W., & Fillmore, C. J. (2012). What does text complexity mean for English learners and language minority students? Commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the Common Core State Standards and next generation science standards, 94, 64.
Fisher D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3), 180-189.
Francis, D., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Friedlaender, D., Burns, D., Lewis-Charp, H., Cook-Harvey, C. M., Zheng, X., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Student-centered schools: Closing the opportunity gap. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Progress monitoring in a multi-tiered prevention system. Perspectives, 3(2), 43–47.
Gendron, S. (2012). Next generation assessments: What to expect. Retrieved from http://www.leadered.com/NGAWhatToExpectWebinar.html
George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. (2009). Promoting excellence: Guiding principles for educating English language learners (2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English language learners, Exceptional Children, 66(4), 545–571.
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., and Tilly, W.D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide. (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–319.
Glei, J. (2013). Talent isn’t fixed and other mindsets that lead to greatness. Retrieved from: http://99u.com/articles/14379/talent-isnt-fixed-and-other-mindsets-that-lead-to-greatness
Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners. American Educator, 37(2), 4–11, 38.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santalego, T. (in press). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to reading: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. Alliance for Excellence in Education. Washington, DC.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescent middle and high school students. Alliance for Excellence in Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/writingnext.pdf
Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C. K., Herman, J., et al. (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3),647–717.
Gutstein, S. E., Burgess, A. F., & Montfort, K. (2007). Evaluation of the relationship development intervention program. Autism, 11(5), 397–411.
Hartry, A., Fitzgerald, R. A., & Porter, K. (2008). Implementing a structured reading program in an afterschool setting: Problems and potential solutions. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 181–210.
Hasselbring, T. S. (2010). Reading proficiency, the struggling reader, and the role of technology. In Baker (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Hasselbring, T. S. (2012). Five reasons readers need technology. Reading: The Core Skill, 6(69).
Hasselbring, T. S., & Bausch, M. E. (2005). Assistive technologies for reading. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 72–75.
Hasselbring, T. S., & Glaser, C. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102–122.
Haynes, M. (2015). The Next Chapter: Supporting Literacy Within ESEA. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. London: Cambridge University Press.
Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family/school partnerships. New York, NY: New Press.
Heo, Y. (2007). The impact of multimedia anchored instruction on the motivation to learn of students with and without learning disabilities placed in inclusive middle school language arts classes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 2007). Dissertations Abstracts International, 6812A, 5031. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from https://www.lib.utexas.edu/etd/d/2007/heoy96433/heoy96433.pdf
Hirsch, E. D. (2014). Sustaining the American experiment. In C. E. Finn & M. J. Petrilli (Eds.), Knowledge at the core: Don Hirsch, Core Knowledge, and the future of the Common Core (pp. 31–47). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Institute.
Hirsch, E. D., & Pondiscio, R. (2010). There’s no such thing as a reading test. The American Prospect, 21(6), A13–A15.
Honig, B., Diamond L., & Gutlohn, L. (2000). CORE teaching reading sourcebook for kindergarten through eighth grade. Novato, CA: Arena Press.
Horn, M.B., & Staker, H. (2014). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
International Dyslexia Association. (2012). Just the facts. Information provided by the International Dyslexia Association. Baltimore, MD.
Jackson, V. L. (2003). Technology and special education: Bridging the most recent digital divide. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 479685.
Kalyanpur, M., & Kirmani, M. (2005). Diversity and technology: Classroom implications of the digital divide. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 9–13.
Kamil, M. L., Intrator, S. M., & Kim, H. S. (2000). The effects of other technologies on literacy and literacy learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 771–788). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://carnegie.org/fileadmin/Media/Publications/PDF/AdolescentsAndLiteracy.pdf
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS). (2008). Retrieved from http://www.kansasmtss.org
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765–778.
Kim, J. S., Capotosto, L., Hartry, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2011). Can a mixed-method literacy intervention improve the reading achievement of low-performing elementary school students in an after-school program? Results from a randomized controlled trial of READ 180 Enterprise. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 183–201.
Kinsella, K. (2013). Cutting to the Common Core: Making vocabulary number one. Language Magazine, 12(12), 18–23.
Kinsella, K., & Feldman, K. (2005). Structures for active participation and learning. New York, NY: Scholastic RED.
Kraft, M., Blazar, D. & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88, (4), 547-588.
Lacina, J. (2004). Promoting language acquisitions: Technology and English language learners. Childhood Education, 81(2), 113–115.
Lane, K. L., Robertson, E. J., & Graham-Bailey, M. A. L. (2006). An examination of schoolwide interventions with primary level efforts conducted in secondary schools: Methodological considerations. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Applications of research methodology: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 19, pp. 157–199). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Lang, L., Torgesen, J., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 149–175.
Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The nation’s report card. Reading, 2007–496.
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Lewis, J., & Moorman, G. (Eds.). (2007). Adolescent literacy instruction: Policies and promising practices (pp. 143–166). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2013). ‘Both and’ literacy instruction: A proposed paradigm shift for the Common Core ELA classroom. Student Achievement Partners.
Lipka, O., Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of a group of grade 4 disabled readers: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 364–378.
Mapp, K. L., & Kuttner, P. J. (2014). Partners in education: A dual capacity-building framework for family-school partnerships. SEDL.
Matsumura, L.C., Correnti, R., Walsh, M., DiPrima Bickel, D., & Zook-Howell, D. (2019). Online content-focused coaching to improve classroom discussion quality, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28:2, 191-215, DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1577748
McInterney, M., & Elledge, A. (2013). Using a response to intervention framework to improve student learning: A pocket guide for state and district leaders. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/sites/default/files/Response_to_Intervention_Pocket_Guide_2.pdf
McIntyre, C. W., & Pickering, J. S. (1995). Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education for students with dyslexia and related disorders. Salem, OR: The International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
Medina, J. J. (2014). Brain rules for baby. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.
Meltzer, L. (2007). Preface. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford.
Miller, A. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Kearns, D., Zhang, W., Yen, L., Patton, S., & Kirchner, D. P. (2014). Behavioral attention: a longitudinal study of whether and how it influences the development of word reading and reading comprehension among at-risk readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 232–249.
Moats, L. (2012). Reconciling the Common Core State Standards with reading research. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 38(4), 15–18.
Molden, D.C., & Dweck, C.S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61, 192–203.
National Center for Learning Disabilities, Inc. (2015). What is RTI? Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/what/whatisrti
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2010). Teacher learning communities. The Council Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CC/0202-nov2010/CC0202Policy.pdf
National Early Literacy Panel (NELP). (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy, National Center for Family Literacy.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA, CCSSO): (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy
National Institutes of Mental Health. (NIMH). (2009, January 9). Autism spectrum disorders (pervasive developmental disorders). Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/autism-spectrum-disorders-pervasive-developmental-disorders/index.shtml
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2008). Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/about/partners/njcld
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
National Research Council (NRC). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. C. E. Snow, M. S. Burns, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Summit. (2014). Technology-enabled Student Application summit. Retrieved from http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TEPLS_report-FINAL-051415.pdf
Powell, W., & Kusama-Powell, O. (2011). How to teach now: Five keys to personalized learning in the global classroom. ASCD.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pytash, K. E., & Morgan, D. N. (2013). A unit of study approach for teaching Common Core State Standards for writing: A unit of study can provide a framework that fosters students’ engagement with writing tasks. Middle School Journal, January.
RAND Corporation. (2014). How to create adaptive innovation and technology policy. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/randeurope/research/innovation_policy/evaluating-science-policy.html
Rock, M.L., Zigmond, N.P., Gregg, M. & Gable, R.A. (2011). The power of virtual coaching. Educational Leadership: Coaching: The New Leadership Skill, 69(2), 42-48.
Rose, D. H. (2014). Stories for Scholastic. Presentation delivered in October 2014.
Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., Strangman, N., & Rappolt, G. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Salinger, T., Moorthy, S., Toplitz, M., Jones, W., & Rosenthal, E. (2010). Implementation matters: Systems for success. A descriptive study of READ 180 in urban middle schools. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Scarborough, H. S. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (1998). Grammar as resource: Writing a description. Research in the Teaching of English, 32(2) 182–211.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2009). Language in academic subject areas and classroom instruction: What is academic language and how can we teach it? Invited paper for a workshop on the Role of Language in School Learning sponsored by The National Academy of Sciences, Menlo Park, CA.
Scholastic Inc. (2015). Kids and family reading report. Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/readingreport/
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2009). Lawrence Public Schools research update. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2012). Deer Valley Unified School District research update. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2014). Compendium of READ 180 research. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
Scholastic Research & Validation. (2014). Striving readers overview. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
Shanahan, T. (2008). Implications of RTI for the reading teacher. In International Reading Association, Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators (pp. 105–122).
Shanahan, T., & Beck, I. (2006). Effective literacy teaching for English language learners. In D. August and T. Shanahan. Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language minority children and youth (pp. 415–488). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York, NY: Random House.
Shepherd, M. J., & Marzola, E. S. (2011). Assessment. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed., pp. 427–458). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
Sideridis, G., Mouzaki, A., Simos, P., & Protopapas, A. (2006). Classifications of students with reading comprehension difficulties: The roles of motivation, affect, and psychopathology. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(3), 159–180.
Slavin, R.E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly 43(3), 290–332.
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading. RAND: Santa Monica, CA.
Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328, 450–452. Retrieved from http://colabradio.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/academiclanguage.pdf
Staker, H., Chan, E., Clayton, M., Hernandez, A., Horn, M. B., & Mackey, K. (2011). The rise of k–12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. Innosight Institute report. Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/The-Rise-ofK-12-Blended-Learning.pdf
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K–12 blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Stecker, P., Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819.
Stewart, R. M., Benner, G. J., Martella, R. C., Marchand-Martella, N. E. (2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 9, 239–253.
Strickland, D. (2011). Teaching phonics today: Word study strategies through the grades (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1-2), 23-50.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., Scott, T., Liaupsin, C., Sailor, W., Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., III, Wickham, D., Wilcox, B., & Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavioral support and functional behavioral assessment
in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253-57.
Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L. M., Decker, S. M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Francis, D. J., Rivera, M. O., & Lesaux, N. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Tucker, C. & Wycoff, T. (2019). Breaking the mold with blended coaching. ASCD Express: Coaching for Success, 15(06).
Vanderlinde, R., & vanBraak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries, and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.
Vaughn, S., & Denton, C.A. (2008). Tier 2: The role of intervention. In D. Fuchs, L. Fuchs, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators (pp. 51–69). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Vermont Writing Collaborative. (2015). What is writing for understanding? Retrieved from http://www.vermontwritingcollaborative.org/Whatis.html
Wagner, R. K. (2008). Rediscovering dyslexia: New approaches for identification and classification. In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 174–191). New York, NY: Sage Publications Ltd.
Wattenberg, R. (2014). Complex texts require content knowledge: Will the new English standards get the content curriculum they need? In C. E. Finn, & M. J. Petrilli (Eds.), Knowledge at the core: Don Hirsch, Core Knowledge, and the future of the Common Core (pp. 31–47). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Institute.
Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Anneli, S., Hamalainen, S. & Poikionen, P. (2009). Professional learning communities and teacher well being? A comparative analysis of primary schools in England and Finland. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 405–422.
Wehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PLOS One 9(11).
What Works Clearinghouse. (2009). Intervention READ 180. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Whiteboard Advisors. (2012). System 44 and READ 180: Improving outcomes and reducing costs. New York, NY: Scholastic Inc.
Williams, T., Hakuta, K., Haertel, E., et al. (2007). Similar English learner students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A follow-up analysis, based on a large scale survey of California elementary schools serving low income and EL students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource.
Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Snyder, A. E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J. G., & Atkins, J. G. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17.
Wolf, M. (2013). How the reading brain resolves the reading wars. Retrieved from http://literatenation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/102513-ReadBrainWP-eb.pdf
Yeager, D. S., Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). How can we instill productive mindsets at scale? A review of the evidence and an initial R&D agenda. White Paper prepared for the White House meeting on “Excellence in Education: The Importance of Academic Mindsets.”
Yeager, D.S., Walton, G., Ritter, G., & Dweck, C.S. (2013). Full-scale implementation of psychological interventions at a large institution: An experimental test. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Texas at Austin.
Zill, N., Collins, M., West, J., & Hausken, E. G. (1995). Approaching kindergarten: A look at preschoolers in the United States. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, N.C.E.S., and N.H.E.S.
Zwiers, J. (2014). Developing academic oral communication skills. Retrieved from http://www.jeffzwiers.org/oral-communication.html
Zydney, J. M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2014). Mini anchors: A universal design for learning approach. TechTrends.
Zydney, J. M., Bathke, A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2014). Finding the optimal guidance for enhancing anchored instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 668–683.